Literature DB >> 21330954

Correlation between immediate in-brace correction and biomechanical effectiveness of brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Julien Clin1, Carl-Éric Aubin, Archana Sangole, Hubert Labelle, Stefan Parent.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Multiple brace designs were simulated using a finite element model and their biomechanical effect was evaluated.
OBJECTIVE: To study correlations between immediate in-brace correction of coronal curves and bending moments acting on the apical vertebrae. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Immediate in-brace correction has often been deemed as fundamental to long-term brace effect but the biomechanical explanation is unclear.
METHODS: Three-dimensional geometry of 3 patients was acquired using multiview radiographs and surface topography techniques. A finite element model of the patients' trunk including gravitational forces and a parametric brace model were created. Two sets of mechanical properties of the spine (stiff and flexible) were tested. Installation of the brace on the patients was simulated. Using an experimental design framework including fourteen design factors, 1024 different virtual braces were tested for each patient. For each brace, immediate in-brace correction of the coronal Cobb angles and the bending moment acting on the apical vertebrae were computed and their correlation was studied.
RESULTS: Immediate correction of coronal curves and corresponding impact on the apical vertebrae bending moments were linearly correlated (mean R = 0.88). The amount of immediate correction necessary to nullify the bending moment ranged between 19% and 61% with average 48% (flexible spine model) and 27% (stiff spine model). The braces corrected the apical vertebrae bending moment more in the flexible spine model. In the framework of the Hueter-Volkmann principle, the correlation between coronal immediate in-brace correction and corresponding apical bending moment can be interpreted as a correlation between immediate in-brace correction and long-term treatment outcome. The amount of immediate correction necessary to invert the bending moments, and in theory counteract the progression of the scoliotic deformity, depends on spine stiffness and spine segment.
CONCLUSION: This study confirms the importance of immediate in-brace correction to predict long-term outcome of the treatment and provides insights in the understanding of brace biomechanics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21330954     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cb46f6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  28 in total

1.  Three dimensional analysis of brace biomechanical efficacy for patients with AIS.

Authors:  David E Lebel; Zaid Al-Aubaidi; Eyun-Jung Shin; Andrew Howard; Reinhard Zeller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Development of CAD/CAM Based Brace Models for the Treatment of Patients with Scoliosis-Classification Based Approach versus Finite Element Modelling.

Authors:  Hans-Rudolf Weiss; Alexander Kleban
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-09-22

3.  Head to pelvis alignment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients both in and out of brace.

Authors:  Claudio Vergari; Isabelle Courtois; Eric Ebermeyer; Raphael Pietton; Houssam Bouloussa; Raphael Vialle; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Effectiveness of braces designed using computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and finite element simulation compared to CAD/CAM only for the conservative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  N Cobetto; C E Aubin; S Parent; J Clin; S Barchi; I Turgeon; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Prediction of brace effect in scoliotic patients: blinded evaluation of a novel brace simulator-an observational cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Aurélien Courvoisier; Matthieu Nesme; Julien Gerbelot; Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry; François Faure
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-03-16       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Low body mass index can be predictive of bracing failure in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Weixiang Sun; Jin Zhou; Minghui Sun; Xiaodong Qin; Yong Qiu; Zezhang Zhu; Leilei Xu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Finite element analysis in brace treatment on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Wenqing Wei; Tianyuan Zhang; Zifang Huang; Junlin Yang
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Review of current technologies and methods supplementing brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Andrew Chan; Edmond Lou; Doug Hill
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 1.548

9.  A prospective randomized controlled study on the treatment outcome of SpineCor brace versus rigid brace for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with follow-up according to the SRS standardized criteria.

Authors:  Jing Guo; Tsz Ping Lam; Man Sang Wong; Bobby Kin Wah Ng; Kwong Man Lee; King Lok Liu; Lik Hang Hung; Ajax Hong Yin Lau; Sai Wing Sin; Wing Kwan Kwok; Fiona Wai Ping Yu; Yong Qiu; Jack Chun Yiu Cheng
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  2016 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth.

Authors:  Stefano Negrini; Sabrina Donzelli; Angelo Gabriele Aulisa; Dariusz Czaprowski; Sanja Schreiber; Jean Claude de Mauroy; Helmut Diers; Theodoros B Grivas; Patrick Knott; Tomasz Kotwicki; Andrea Lebel; Cindy Marti; Toru Maruyama; Joe O'Brien; Nigel Price; Eric Parent; Manuel Rigo; Michele Romano; Luke Stikeleather; James Wynne; Fabio Zaina
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2018-01-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.