Literature DB >> 21330894

Teaching advanced cardiac life support protocols: the effectiveness of static versus high-fidelity simulation.

Jason M King1, Deanna L Reising.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of static simulation to high-fidelity simulation when teaching advanced cardiac life support guidelines. Using a quasi-experimental design, 49 BSN students were randomly assigned to 2 groups of either static or high-fidelity simulation. There were no significant differences between the static and high-fidelity simulation groups on the written examination. The high-fidelity simulation group outperformed the static simulation group on megacode performance.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21330894     DOI: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e31820b5012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurse Educ        ISSN: 0363-3624            Impact factor:   2.082


  3 in total

1.  Effects of high-fidelity simulation based on life-threatening clinical condition scenarios on learning outcomes of undergraduate and postgraduate nursing students: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Carmen La Cerra; Angelo Dante; Valeria Caponnetto; Ilaria Franconi; Elona Gaxhja; Cristina Petrucci; Celeste M Alfes; Loreto Lancia
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Translation of ERC resuscitation guidelines into clinical practice by emergency physicians.

Authors:  Henrik Fischer; Kaspar Bachmann; Guido Strunk; Stephanie Neuhold; Bernhard Zapletal; Claudia Maurer; Andrea Fast; Dominik Stumpf; Robert Greif
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Randomized control trial of high fidelity vs low fidelity simulation for training undergraduate students in neonatal resuscitation.

Authors:  Archana Nimbalkar; Dipen Patel; Amit Kungwani; Ajay Phatak; Rohitkumar Vasa; Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-11-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.