BACKGROUND: Introducing novel methods in undergraduate teaching of obstetrics and gynecology has been recommended. High-fidelity simulation of shoulder dystocia has been shown to improve skills of qualified maternity staff. We aimed to assess whether simulation is also useful for improving medical students' skills. METHODS:Twenty-four medical students were recruited. Training consisted of a high-fidelity simulation teaching session for all 24 students and a refresher session for which the same students were randomly allocated to two groups. Half attended a small-group tutorial (SGT) and half a simulation session with a patient-actor (hybrid simulation, HYB). Afterward, they were asked to deliver a baby with simulated shoulder dystocia. We assessed their practical skills and compared communication skills between SGT and HYB. Primary outcome measure was their communication score, using a validated scale. Secondary measure was the students' ability to deliver the baby appropriately. RESULTS: Posttraining, all students managed delivery appropriately. Group HYB had significantly higher median total patient perception scores (11 simulation versus 9 tutorial, P = 0.0239, Mann-Whitney) than SGT. CONCLUSION: High-fidelity simulation can be used to train and evaluate learning. The use of patient-actors during simulation improves students' communication skills. Future research should assess whether this translates into better communication with real patients.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Introducing novel methods in undergraduate teaching of obstetrics and gynecology has been recommended. High-fidelity simulation of shoulder dystocia has been shown to improve skills of qualified maternity staff. We aimed to assess whether simulation is also useful for improving medical students' skills. METHODS: Twenty-four medical students were recruited. Training consisted of a high-fidelity simulation teaching session for all 24 students and a refresher session for which the same students were randomly allocated to two groups. Half attended a small-group tutorial (SGT) and half a simulation session with a patient-actor (hybrid simulation, HYB). Afterward, they were asked to deliver a baby with simulated shoulder dystocia. We assessed their practical skills and compared communication skills between SGT and HYB. Primary outcome measure was their communication score, using a validated scale. Secondary measure was the students' ability to deliver the baby appropriately. RESULTS: Posttraining, all students managed delivery appropriately. Group HYB had significantly higher median total patient perception scores (11 simulation versus 9 tutorial, P = 0.0239, Mann-Whitney) than SGT. CONCLUSION: High-fidelity simulation can be used to train and evaluate learning. The use of patient-actors during simulation improves students' communication skills. Future research should assess whether this translates into better communication with real patients.
Authors: Conor Gilligan; Martine Powell; Marita C Lynagh; Bernadette M Ward; Chris Lonsdale; Pam Harvey; Erica L James; Dominique Rich; Sari P Dewi; Smriti Nepal; Hayley A Croft; Jonathan Silverman Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-02-08
Authors: Shereen Ajab; Emma Pearson; Steven Dumont; Alicia Mitchell; Jack Kastelik; Packianathaswamy Balaji; David Hepburn Journal: JMIR Med Educ Date: 2022-05-09
Authors: Sonia Lippke; Christina Derksen; Franziska Maria Keller; Lukas Kötting; Martina Schmiedhofer; Annalena Welp Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-05 Impact factor: 3.390