Literature DB >> 21330612

Single-leg cycle training is superior to double-leg cycling in improving the oxidative potential and metabolic profile of trained skeletal muscle.

Chris R Abbiss1, Leonidas G Karagounis, Paul B Laursen, Jeremiah J Peiffer, David T Martin, John A Hawley, Naeem N Fatehee, James C Martin.   

Abstract

Single-leg cycling may enhance the peripheral adaptations of skeletal muscle to a greater extent than double-leg cycling. The purpose of the current study was to determine the influence of 3 wk of high-intensity single- and double-leg cycle training on markers of oxidative potential and muscle metabolism and exercise performance. In a crossover design, nine trained cyclists (78 ± 7 kg body wt, 59 ± 5 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1) maximal O(2) consumption) performed an incremental cycling test and a 16-km cycling time trial before and after 3 wk of double-leg and counterweighted single-leg cycle training (2 training sessions per week). Training involved three (double) or six (single) maximal 4-min intervals with 6 min of recovery. Mean power output during the single-leg intervals was more than half that during the double-leg intervals (198 ± 29 vs. 344 ± 38 W, P < 0.05). Skeletal muscle biopsy samples from the vastus lateralis revealed a training-induced increase in Thr(172)-phosphorylated 5'-AMP-activated protein kinase α-subunit for both groups (P < 0.05). However, the increase in cytochrome c oxidase subunits II and IV and GLUT-4 protein concentration was greater following single- than double-leg cycling (P < 0.05). Training-induced improvements in maximal O(2) consumption (3.9 ± 6.2% vs. 0.6 ± 3.6%) and time-trial performance (1.3 ± 0.5% vs. 2.3 ± 4.2%) were similar following both interventions. We conclude that short-term high-intensity single-leg cycle training can elicit greater enhancement in the metabolic and oxidative potential of skeletal muscle than traditional double-leg cycling. Single-leg cycling may therefore provide a valuable training stimulus for trained and clinical populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21330612     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01247.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  22 in total

1.  Superior mitochondrial adaptations in human skeletal muscle after interval compared to continuous single-leg cycling matched for total work.

Authors:  Martin J MacInnis; Evelyn Zacharewicz; Brian J Martin; Maria E Haikalis; Lauren E Skelly; Mark A Tarnopolsky; Robyn M Murphy; Martin J Gibala
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  High-intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle. Part II: anaerobic energy, neuromuscular load and practical applications.

Authors:  Martin Buchheit; Paul B Laursen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Interlimb differences in parameters of aerobic function and local profiles of deoxygenation during double-leg and counterweighted single-leg cycling.

Authors:  Danilo Iannetta; Louis Passfield; Ahmad Qahtani; Martin J MacInnis; Juan M Murias
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 4.  Role of Ratings of Perceived Exertion during Self-Paced Exercise: What are We Actually Measuring?

Authors:  Chris R Abbiss; Jeremiah J Peiffer; Romain Meeusen; Sabrina Skorski
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Physiological Responses to Counterweighted Single-Leg Cycling in Older Males.

Authors:  Phil LaSCOLA; C Eric Heidorn; Brandon Pollock; Keith Burns; John McDANIEL
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2020-12-01

Review 6.  Physiological adaptations to interval training and the role of exercise intensity.

Authors:  Martin J MacInnis; Martin J Gibala
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 7.  Training-Induced Changes in Mitochondrial Content and Respiratory Function in Human Skeletal Muscle.

Authors:  Cesare Granata; Nicholas A Jamnick; David J Bishop
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Fatigue is specific to working muscles: no cross-over with single-leg cycling in trained cyclists.

Authors:  Steven J Elmer; Markus Amann; John McDaniel; David T Martin; James C Martin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Cardiovascular responses to counterweighted single-leg cycling: implications for rehabilitation.

Authors:  Keith J Burns; Brandon S Pollock; Phil Lascola; John McDaniel
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Handcycling: training effects of a specific dose of upper body endurance training in females.

Authors:  Florentina J Hettinga; Mark Hoogwerf; Lucas H V van der Woude
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.