S R Kanthan1, G Kavitha, S Addi, D S K Choon, T Kamarul. 1. Tissue Engineering Group, NOCERAL, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. srkanthan75@gmail.com
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The use of bone grafts in treating non- or delayed unions as the result of large bone loss is well established. However, despite good outcomes, the time to achieve complete union is still considerably long. To overcome this problem, the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been advocated albeit with varying success. To determine the true effectiveness of PRP in treating non-/delayed unions, a study was conducted using (n=12) rabbit models. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Critical-sized defects measuring 2cm created in the midshaft of the right rabbit tibias were stabilised using 2.7-mm small fragment plates. A spacer placed in the defects to create a delay in bone union was replaced at 3 weeks with artificial bone grafts (Coragraft®), with or without PRP. The operated limbs were radiographed following the defect creation and at 3, 7 and 11 weeks (at sacrifice). Bone healing and histological changes were later assessed and scored using the appropriate grading systems. Four groups were compared for quality of healing: (group-A) control group, that is, no PRP or Coragraft; (group-B) PRP; (group-C) Coragraft; and (group-D) PRP and Coragraft. RESULTS: Group-D demonstrated the best bone healing based on radiological, histological and gross findings (Kruskall-Wallis: p<0.05). Group-C had significantly higher scores than group-B, whilst group-A had significantly lower scores than all other groups (Mann-Whitney U: p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The use of PRP with bone graft significantly improves the quality of bone healing. However, the use of PRP without bone substitute does not provide adequate repair tissue and, therefore, provides little benefit when used independently.
INTRODUCTION: The use of bone grafts in treating non- or delayed unions as the result of large bone loss is well established. However, despite good outcomes, the time to achieve complete union is still considerably long. To overcome this problem, the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been advocated albeit with varying success. To determine the true effectiveness of PRP in treating non-/delayed unions, a study was conducted using (n=12) rabbit models. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Critical-sized defects measuring 2cm created in the midshaft of the right rabbittibias were stabilised using 2.7-mm small fragment plates. A spacer placed in the defects to create a delay in bone union was replaced at 3 weeks with artificial bone grafts (Coragraft®), with or without PRP. The operated limbs were radiographed following the defect creation and at 3, 7 and 11 weeks (at sacrifice). Bone healing and histological changes were later assessed and scored using the appropriate grading systems. Four groups were compared for quality of healing: (group-A) control group, that is, no PRP or Coragraft; (group-B) PRP; (group-C) Coragraft; and (group-D) PRP and Coragraft. RESULTS: Group-D demonstrated the best bone healing based on radiological, histological and gross findings (Kruskall-Wallis: p<0.05). Group-C had significantly higher scores than group-B, whilst group-A had significantly lower scores than all other groups (Mann-Whitney U: p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The use of PRP with bone graft significantly improves the quality of bone healing. However, the use of PRP without bone substitute does not provide adequate repair tissue and, therefore, provides little benefit when used independently.
Authors: Matthew T Houdek; Cody C Wyles; Mark S Collins; Benjamin M Howe; Andre Terzic; Atta Behfar; Rafael J Sierra Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Gábor Skaliczki; Károly Schandl; Miklós Weszl; Tibor Major; Miklós Kovács; József Skaliczki; Miklós Szendrői; Csaba Dobó-Nagy; Zsombor Lacza Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2013-01-15 Impact factor: 3.075