INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this bench top evidence level 5 in vitro study was to compare the cytotoxic effect of 2 brands of white mineral trioxide aggregate cement (ProRoot MTA and MTA-Angelus), Brasseler EndoSequence Root Repair Material, and Brasseler EndoSequence Root Repair Putty by using human dermal fibroblasts. METHODS: The cells were cultured in recommended culture conditions and exposed to the tested materials. The cytotoxic effects were recorded at an observation period of 24 hours by using a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT)-based colorimetric assay. Results were analyzed by using one-way analysis of variance with significance of p < .05. RESULTS: All materials tested demonstrated cell viability ≥ 91.8%. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in cell viability of ProRoot MTA, MTA-Angelus, and Brasseler EndoSequence Root Repair Material. However, there was a statistically significant difference negatively associated with the cell viability of human dermal fibroblasts in association with the Brasseler EndoSequence Root Repair Putty. CONCLUSIONS: The Brasseler EndoSequence Root Repair Materials were shown to have similar cytotoxicity levels to those of ProRoot MTA and MTA-Angelus.
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this bench top evidence level 5 in vitro study was to compare the cytotoxic effect of 2 brands of white mineral trioxide aggregate cement (ProRoot MTA and MTA-Angelus), Brasseler EndoSequence Root Repair Material, and Brasseler EndoSequence Root Repair Putty by using human dermal fibroblasts. METHODS: The cells were cultured in recommended culture conditions and exposed to the tested materials. The cytotoxic effects were recorded at an observation period of 24 hours by using a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT)-based colorimetric assay. Results were analyzed by using one-way analysis of variance with significance of p < .05. RESULTS: All materials tested demonstrated cell viability ≥ 91.8%. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in cell viability of ProRoot MTA, MTA-Angelus, and Brasseler EndoSequence Root Repair Material. However, there was a statistically significant difference negatively associated with the cell viability of human dermal fibroblasts in association with the Brasseler EndoSequence Root Repair Putty. CONCLUSIONS: The Brasseler EndoSequence Root Repair Materials were shown to have similar cytotoxicity levels to those of ProRoot MTA and MTA-Angelus.
Authors: Lauter E Pelepenko; Flavia Saavedra; Thiago B M Antunes; Gabriela F Bombarda; Brenda P F A Gomes; Alexandre A Zaia; Josette Camilleri; Marina A Marciano Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2020-08-31 Impact factor: 3.573