Literature DB >> 21329409

Therapy outcome measures: where are we now?

Alexandra John1.   

Abstract

Outcomes information contributes to the provision of quality services: sharing that information requires speech-language pathologists (SLPs) to use terminology readily understood by professions ranging from health and education to social and voluntary services. The Therapy Outcome Measure (TOM) provides a way of presenting outcome data in a digestible form, comprising part of a range of multiple measures used to collect information on the structures, processes, and outcomes of care. TOM was developed to provide a practical method of measuring outcomes in routine clinical practice. Furthermore, it has been used in a number of research studies as an outcome indicator. As an example of its utility in research, the article cites a benchmarking study, together with examples of internal and external benchmarking of outcomes intended to illustrate how the benchmarking of TOM data can inform practice. The TOM can therefore inform SLPs on their own outcomes, the outcomes for specific client groups, and, by benchmarking TOM data, can contribute to the delivery of better, more efficient services.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21329409     DOI: 10.3109/17549507.2010.497562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol        ISSN: 1754-9507            Impact factor:   2.484


  4 in total

1.  Computerised speech and language therapy or attention control added to usual care for people with long-term post-stroke aphasia: the Big CACTUS three-arm RCT.

Authors:  Rebecca Palmer; Munyaradzi Dimairo; Nicholas Latimer; Elizabeth Cross; Marian Brady; Pam Enderby; Audrey Bowen; Steven Julious; Madeleine Harrison; Abualbishr Alshreef; Ellen Bradley; Arjun Bhadhuri; Tim Chater; Helen Hughes; Helen Witts; Esther Herbert; Cindy Cooper
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Creation and Initial Validation of the International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative Functional Diet Scale.

Authors:  Catriona M Steele; Ashwini M Namasivayam-MacDonald; Brittany T Guida; Julie A Cichero; Janice Duivestein; Ben Hanson; Peter Lam; Luis F Riquelme
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Self-managed, computerised speech and language therapy for patients with chronic aphasia post-stroke compared with usual care or attention control (Big CACTUS): a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Rebecca Palmer; Munyaradzi Dimairo; Cindy Cooper; Pam Enderby; Marian Brady; Audrey Bowen; Nicholas Latimer; Steven Julious; Elizabeth Cross; Abualbishr Alshreef; Madeleine Harrison; Ellen Bradley; Helen Witts; Tim Chater
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 44.182

4.  Where are we now with aphasia after Stroke?

Authors:  Pam Enderby; Laura Sutton
Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 1.383

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.