BACKGROUND: The new Orion space capsule requires additional consideration of possible injury during landing due to the dynamic nature of the impact. The purpose of this parametric study was to determine changes in the injury response of a human body finite element model with a suit connector (SC). METHODS: The possibility of thoracic bony injury, thoracic soft tissue injury, and femur injury were assessed in 24 different model configurations. These simulations had two SC placements and two SC types, a 2.27-kg rectangular and a 3.17-kg circular SC. A baseline model was tested with the same acceleration pulses and no SC for comparison. Further simulations were conducted to determine the protective effect of SC location changes and adding small and large rigid chest plates. The possibilities of rib, chest soft tissue, and femur injury were evaluated using sternal deflection, chest deflection, viscous criterion, and strain values. RESULTS: The results indicated a higher likelihood of chest injury than femur injury. The mean first principal strain in the femur was 0.136 +/- 0.007%, which is well below the failure limit for cortical bone. The placement of chest plates had a protective effect and reduced the sternal deflection, chest deflection, and viscous criterion values. CONCLUSION: If possible, the SC should be placed on the thigh to minimize injury risk metrics. Chest plates appear to offer some protective value; therefore, a large rigid chest plate or similar countermeasure should be considered for chest SC placement.
BACKGROUND: The new Orion space capsule requires additional consideration of possible injury during landing due to the dynamic nature of the impact. The purpose of this parametric study was to determine changes in the injury response of a human body finite element model with a suit connector (SC). METHODS: The possibility of thoracic bony injury, thoracic soft tissue injury, and femur injury were assessed in 24 different model configurations. These simulations had two SC placements and two SC types, a 2.27-kg rectangular and a 3.17-kg circular SC. A baseline model was tested with the same acceleration pulses and no SC for comparison. Further simulations were conducted to determine the protective effect of SC location changes and adding small and large rigid chest plates. The possibilities of rib, chest soft tissue, and femur injury were evaluated using sternal deflection, chest deflection, viscous criterion, and strain values. RESULTS: The results indicated a higher likelihood of chest injury than femur injury. The mean first principal strain in the femur was 0.136 +/- 0.007%, which is well below the failure limit for cortical bone. The placement of chest plates had a protective effect and reduced the sternal deflection, chest deflection, and viscous criterion values. CONCLUSION: If possible, the SC should be placed on the thigh to minimize injury risk metrics. Chest plates appear to offer some protective value; therefore, a large rigid chest plate or similar countermeasure should be considered for chest SC placement.
Authors: Jeffrey T Somers; Nathaniel Newby; Charles Lawrence; Richard DeWeese; David Moorcroft; Shean Phelps Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol Date: 2014-03-17