Literature DB >> 21328711

Bioinformatic approaches for predicting substrates of proteases.

Jiangning Song1, Hao Tan, Sarah E Boyd, Hongbin Shen, Khalid Mahmood, Geoffrey I Webb, Tatsuya Akutsu, James C Whisstock, Robert N Pike.   

Abstract

Proteases have central roles in "life and death" processes due to their important ability to catalytically hydrolyze protein substrates, usually altering the function and/or activity of the target in the process. Knowledge of the substrate specificity of a protease should, in theory, dramatically improve the ability to predict target protein substrates. However, experimental identification and characterization of protease substrates is often difficult and time-consuming. Thus solving the "substrate identification" problem is fundamental to both understanding protease biology and the development of therapeutics that target specific protease-regulated pathways. In this context, bioinformatic prediction of protease substrates may provide useful and experimentally testable information about novel potential cleavage sites in candidate substrates. In this article, we provide an overview of recent advances in developing bioinformatic approaches for predicting protease substrate cleavage sites and identifying novel putative substrates. We discuss the advantages and drawbacks of the current methods and detail how more accurate models can be built by deriving multiple sequence and structural features of substrates. We also provide some suggestions about how future studies might further improve the accuracy of protease substrate specificity prediction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21328711     DOI: 10.1142/s0219720011005288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bioinform Comput Biol        ISSN: 0219-7200            Impact factor:   1.122


  12 in total

1.  Twenty years of bioinformatics research for protease-specific substrate and cleavage site prediction: a comprehensive revisit and benchmarking of existing methods.

Authors:  Fuyi Li; Yanan Wang; Chen Li; Tatiana T Marquez-Lago; André Leier; Neil D Rawlings; Gholamreza Haffari; Jerico Revote; Tatsuya Akutsu; Kuo-Chen Chou; Anthony W Purcell; Robert N Pike; Geoffrey I Webb; A Ian Smith; Trevor Lithgow; Roger J Daly; James C Whisstock; Jiangning Song
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 11.622

2.  PROSPERous: high-throughput prediction of substrate cleavage sites for 90 proteases with improved accuracy.

Authors:  Jiangning Song; Fuyi Li; André Leier; Tatiana T Marquez-Lago; Tatsuya Akutsu; Gholamreza Haffari; Kuo-Chen Chou; Geoffrey I Webb; Robert N Pike; John Hancock
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Network analyses reveal pervasive functional regulation between proteases in the human protease web.

Authors:  Nikolaus Fortelny; Jennifer H Cox; Reinhild Kappelhoff; Amanda E Starr; Philipp F Lange; Paul Pavlidis; Christopher M Overall
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 8.029

4.  Predicting CD4 T-cell epitopes based on antigen cleavage, MHCII presentation, and TCR recognition.

Authors:  Dina Schneidman-Duhovny; Natalia Khuri; Guang Qiang Dong; Michael B Winter; Eric Shifrut; Nir Friedman; Charles S Craik; Kathleen P Pratt; Pedro Paz; Fred Aswad; Andrej Sali
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Software-aided workflow for predicting protease-specific cleavage sites using physicochemical properties of the natural and unnatural amino acids in peptide-based drug discovery.

Authors:  Tatiana Radchenko; Fabien Fontaine; Luca Morettoni; Ismael Zamora
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  PROSPER: an integrated feature-based tool for predicting protease substrate cleavage sites.

Authors:  Jiangning Song; Hao Tan; Andrew J Perry; Tatsuya Akutsu; Geoffrey I Webb; James C Whisstock; Robert N Pike
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A computational module assembled from different protease family motifs identifies PI PLC from Bacillus cereus as a putative prolyl peptidase with a serine protease scaffold.

Authors:  Adela Rendón-Ramírez; Manish Shukla; Masataka Oda; Sandeep Chakraborty; Renu Minda; Abhaya M Dandekar; Bjarni Ásgeirsson; Félix M Goñi; Basuthkar J Rao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Peptidase specificity from the substrate cleavage collection in the MEROPS database and a tool to measure cleavage site conservation.

Authors:  Neil D Rawlings
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 4.079

9.  Identification of Protease Specificity Using Biotin-Labeled Substrates.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Yamamoto; Syota Saito; Yoshikazu Sawaguchi; Michio Kimura
Journal:  Open Biochem J       Date:  2017-04-21

10.  Block-based characterization of protease specificity from substrate sequence profile.

Authors:  Enfeng Qi; Dongyu Wang; Bo Gao; Yang Li; Guojun Li
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.