Literature DB >> 21328517

Efficacy and safety of the PPARγ partial agonist balaglitazone compared with pioglitazone and placebo: a phase III, randomized, parallel-group study in patients with type 2 diabetes on stable insulin therapy.

Kim Henriksen1, Inger Byrjalsen, Per Qvist, Henning Beck-Nielsen, Gitte Hansen, Bente J Riis, Hans Perrild, Ole Lander Svendsen, Jeppe Gram, Morten A Karsdal, Claus Christiansen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment of patients with perioxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ full agonists are associated with weight gain, heart failure, peripheral oedema, and bone loss. However, the safety of partial perioxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ agonists has not been established in a clinical trial. The BALaglitazone glucose Lowering Efficacy Trial aimed to establish the glucose-lowering effects and safety parameters of the perioxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ partial agonist balaglitazone in diabetic patients on stable insulin therapy.
METHODS: Four hundred and nine subjects from three countries with type 2 diabetes on stable insulin therapy were randomized to 26 weeks of double-blind treatment with once daily doses of 10 or 20 mg balaglitazone, 45 mg pioglitazone, or matching placebo (n ≥ 99 in each group). The primary endpoint was the efficacy of balaglitazone 10 and 20 mg versus placebo on the absolute change in haemoglobin A(1c) . Secondary endpoints included levels of fasting serum glucose, and changes in body composition and bone mineral density as measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, in comparison to pioglitazone 45 mg. This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00515632.
RESULTS: In the 10- and 20-mg balaglitazone groups, and in the 45-mg pioglitazone group, significant reductions in haemoglobin A(1c) levels were observed (−0.99, −1.11, and −1.22%, respectively; p < 0.0001) versus placebo. Fasting serum glucose was similarly reduced in all treatment arms. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry analyses showed that, while balaglitazone at 10 mg caused weight gain and fluid retention compared to placebo, the magnitude of these effects was significantly smaller than that of pioglitazone 45 mg and balaglitazone 20mg. Balaglitazone at either dose did not appear to reduce bone mineral density, while Pioglitazone showed a trend towards a reduction.
CONCLUSION: Patients treated with balaglitazone at 10 mg and 20 mg and pioglitazone at 45 mg showed clinically meaningful improvements in glucose levels and HbA(1c) . With the 10 mg dose, the benefits (glucose &amp; HgA(1c) lowering) and untoward effects (fluid and fat accumulation) were less, results that encourage further studies of this drug candidate.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21328517     DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.1187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev        ISSN: 1520-7552            Impact factor:   4.876


  22 in total

Review 1.  Submaximal PPARγ activation and endothelial dysfunction: new perspectives for the management of cardiovascular disorders.

Authors:  Pitchai Balakumar; Sonam Kathuria
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Serum endotrophin identifies optimal responders to PPARγ agonists in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Morten A Karsdal; Kim Henriksen; Federica Genovese; Diana J Leeming; Mette J Nielsen; Bente J Riis; Claus Christiansen; Inger Byrjalsen; Detlef Schuppan
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 3.  A Narrative Review of Potential Future Antidiabetic Drugs: Should We Expect More?

Authors:  Gaurav Chikara; Pramod Kumar Sharma; Pradeep Dwivedi; Jaykaran Charan; Sneha Ambwani; Surjit Singh
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2017-06-08

Review 4.  Drug therapies in type 2 diabetes: an era of personalised medicine.

Authors:  Tahseen A Chowdhury; Paul Grant
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.659

Review 5.  Investigational anti-hyperglycemic agents: the future of type 2 diabetes therapy?

Authors:  Sachin K Majumdar; Silvio E Inzucchi
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 6.  The effect of thiazolidinediones on bone mineral density and bone turnover: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emma O Billington; Andrew Grey; Mark J Bolland
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 7.  The future of thiazolidinedione therapy in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Hanford Yau; Kathya Rivera; Romina Lomonaco; Kenneth Cusi
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 8.  PPAR-γ as a therapeutic target in cardiovascular disease: evidence and uncertainty.

Authors:  Janice V Huang; Clifford R Greyson; Gregory G Schwartz
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 5.922

Review 9.  Thiazolidinediones and the promise of insulin sensitization in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Raymond E Soccio; Eric R Chen; Mitchell A Lazar
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 27.287

10.  Future detection and monitoring of diabetes may entail analysis of both β-cell function and volume: how markers of β-cell loss may assist.

Authors:  Anita V Neutzsky-Wulff; Kim V Andreassen; Sara T Hjuler; Michael Feigh; Anne-Christine Bay-Jensen; Qinlong Zheng; Kim Henriksen; Morten A Karsdal
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.