Literature DB >> 21327920

Should a colonoscopy be recommended for healthy individuals with increased carcinoembryonic antigen levels? A case-control study.

Jin Ha Lee1, Sung Pil Hong, Tae Joo Jeon, Gun-Hi Kang, Won-Choong Choi, Soung Min Jeon, Chang Mo Moon, Jae Jun Park, Jae Hee Cheon, Tae Il Kim, Won Ho Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Despite the limitations of screening or early diagnosis of colorectal cancers (CRC), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is frequently measured in practice and during health promotion programs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of colonoscopy in healthy individuals with elevated CEA levels.
METHODS: From January 2003 to November 2008, 117,731 healthy persons underwent an opportunistic screening program in two health promotion centers; 1,497 subjects (1.3%) showed an elevated CEA level (>5 ng/ml). Among them, 174 patients were recruited to undergo a colonoscopy to determine if colorectal malignancies were present. A total of 372 age- and sex-matched persons were selected as controls from among the healthy subjects who had a normal level of CEA and had received surveillance colonoscopy. The primary outcome was the incidences of CRC in elevated CEA and normal CEA groups. The secondary outcome was the predictive factors of CRC in the elevated CEA group.
RESULTS: The incidence of CRC was higher in the group with higher CEA-levels than in the group with normal CEA levels (4.6 vs. 1.3%; P=0.031). In the CEA-elevated group, patients with CRCs were diagnosed at more advanced stages than were those in the CEA-normal group. The incidence of colorectal polyps was not different between the two groups. In the CEA-elevated group, anemia was an independent predictive factor of CRCs by multivariate analysis (P=0.002).
CONCLUSION: Anemia itself is not a predictive factor of CRC in the entire population, but is an independent predictive factor of CRC in healthy individuals with an elevated level of CEA. Therefore, colonoscopy should be recommended for healthy subjects with an elevated level of CEA accompanied with anemia in the absence of other adenocarcinomas to evaluate the presence of colorectal malignancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21327920     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-011-1606-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  31 in total

1.  Health promotion health center project.

Authors:  Tae Wha Lee; Chung Yul Lee; Hee Soon Kim; Ok Kyung Ham
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.462

2.  Historical changes in the objectives of the periodic health examination.

Authors:  P K Han
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-11-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  CEA in tumors of other than colorectal origin.

Authors:  A H Chevinsky
Journal:  Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  1991 May-Jun

4.  The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  R J Schlemper; R H Riddell; Y Kato; F Borchard; H S Cooper; S M Dawsey; M F Dixon; C M Fenoglio-Preiser; J F Fléjou; K Geboes; T Hattori; T Hirota; M Itabashi; M Iwafuchi; A Iwashita; Y I Kim; T Kirchner; M Klimpfinger; M Koike; G Y Lauwers; K J Lewin; G Oberhuber; F Offner; A B Price; C A Rubio; M Shimizu; T Shimoda; P Sipponen; E Solcia; M Stolte; H Watanabe; H Yamabe
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Delivery of cancer screening: how important is the preventive health examination?

Authors:  Joshua J Fenton; Yong Cai; Noel S Weiss; Joann G Elmore; Roy E Pardee; Robert J Reid; Laura-Mae Baldwin
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-03-26

6.  Synchronous and metachronous cancers in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Bang Wool Eom; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Moon-Won Yoo; Jae Jin Cho; Woo Ho Kim; Han-Kwang Yang; Kuhn Uk Lee
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 7.  Practice guidelines for tumor marker use in the clinic.

Authors:  Catharine Sturgeon
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 8.327

8.  Clinical usefulness of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 as a screening test for pancreatic cancer in an asymptomatic population.

Authors:  Jee-Eun Kim; Kyu Taek Lee; Jong Kyun Lee; Seung Woon Paik; Jong Chul Rhee; Kyoo Wan Choi
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.029

9.  Increased CA 19-9 level in patients without malignant disease.

Authors:  Hye-Ryoun Kim; Chang-Hyun Lee; Young Whan Kim; Sung Koo Han; Young-Soo Shim; Jae-Joon Yim
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Synchronous gastric cancer in primary sporadic colorectal cancer patients in Korea.

Authors:  S B Lim; S Y Jeong; H S Choi; D K Sohn; C W Hong; K H Jung; H J Chang; J G Park; I J Choi; C G Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  2 in total

1.  The risk of lymph node metastasis makes it unsafe to expand the conventional indications for endoscopic treatment of T1 colorectal cancer: A retrospective study of 428 patients.

Authors:  Bun Kim; Eun Hye Kim; Soo Jung Park; Jae Hee Cheon; Tae Il Kim; Won Ho Kim; Hoguen Kim; Sung Pil Hong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.889

2.  The significance of elevated tumor markers among patients with interstitial lung diseases.

Authors:  Byoung Soo Kwon; Eun Sun Kim; Sung Yoon Lim; Myung Jin Song; Yeon Wook Kim; Hyung-Jun Kim; Yeon Joo Lee; Jong Sun Park; Young-Jae Cho; Ho Il Yoon; Choon-Taek Lee; Jae Ho Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.996

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.