Literature DB >> 21327468

Urinary cadmium and mammographic density in premenopausal women.

Scott V Adams1, Polly A Newcomb, Martin M Shafer, Charlotte Atkinson, Erin J Aiello Bowles, Katherine M Newton, Johanna W Lampe.   

Abstract

Mammographic density (MD), a strong marker of breast cancer risk, is influenced by genetic, environmental, and hormonal factors. Cadmium, a persistent and widespread environmental pollutant, has been associated with risk of breast cancer, and laboratory evidence suggests cadmium is a carcinogen in the breast. We investigated the hypothesis that cadmium exposure is associated with higher MD. In a cross-sectional study of MD and urinary cadmium concentration, percentage MD (MD%) and Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data Systems (BI-RADS®) density category were determined from screening mammograms of 190 premenopausal women ages 40-45 years. Women completed a health questionnaire, and the cadmium content of spot urine samples was measured with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and corrected for urine creatinine. Urinary cadmium concentrations are thought to reflect exposure to cadmium during a period of 20-30 years. Multivariable linear regression and logistic regression were used to estimate the strength of association between urinary cadmium and mammographic breast density. Adjusted mean MD% among women in the upper tertile of creatinine-corrected urinary cadmium was 4.6% higher (95% CI: -2.3 to 11.6%) than in women in the lowest cadmium tertile. Each twofold increase in urinary cadmium was associated with higher odds of MD% in the upper tertile (OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 0.82-2.02) or a BI-RADS category rating of "extremely dense" (OR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.14-2.70). Stronger associations were observed among nulliparous women, and current or former smokers. Exposure to cadmium may be associated with increased breast density in premenopausal women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21327468      PMCID: PMC3115389          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1383-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  43 in total

1.  Activation of estrogen receptor-alpha by the heavy metal cadmium.

Authors:  A Stoica; B S Katzenellenbogen; M B Martin
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2000-04

2.  Exposure of the U.S. population aged 6 years and older to cadmium: 1988-1994.

Authors:  D C Paschal; V Burt; S P Caudill; E W Gunter; J L Pirkle; E J Sampson; D T Miller; R J Jackson
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Cadmium mimics the in vivo effects of estrogen in the uterus and mammary gland.

Authors:  Michael D Johnson; Nicholas Kenney; Adriana Stoica; Leena Hilakivi-Clarke; Baljit Singh; Gloria Chepko; Robert Clarke; Peter F Sholler; Apolonio A Lirio; Colby Foss; Ronald Reiter; Bruce Trock; Soonmyoung Paik; Mary Beth Martin
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2003-07-13       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  Estrogen-like activity of metals in MCF-7 breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Mary Beth Martin; Ronald Reiter; Trung Pham; Yaniris R Avellanet; Johanna Camara; Michael Lahm; Elisabeth Pentecost; Kiran Pratap; Brent A Gilmore; Shailaja Divekar; Ross S Dagata; Jaime L Bull; Adriana Stoica
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.736

5.  Demographic, anthropometric, and lifestyle factors and dietary intakes in relation to daidzein-metabolizing phenotypes among premenopausal women in the United States.

Authors:  Charlotte Atkinson; Katherine M Newton; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Mellissa Yong; Johanna W Lampe
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 6.  A global perspective on cadmium pollution and toxicity in non-occupationally exposed population.

Authors:  Soisungwan Satarug; Jason R Baker; Supanee Urbenjapol; Melissa Haswell-Elkins; Paul E B Reilly; David J Williams; Michael R Moore
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2003-01-31       Impact factor: 4.372

7.  The association of breast mitogens with mammographic densities.

Authors:  N F Boyd; J Stone; L J Martin; R Jong; E Fishell; M Yaffe; G Hammond; S Minkin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-10-07       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Active, but not passive cigarette smoking was inversely associated with mammographic density.

Authors:  Lesley M Butler; Ellen B Gold; Shannon M Conroy; Carolyn J Crandall; Gail A Greendale; Nina Oestreicher; Charles P Quesenberry; Laurel A Habel
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  No relationship between circulating levels of sex steroids and mammographic breast density: the Prospect-EPIC cohort.

Authors:  Martijn Verheus; Petra H M Peeters; Paulus A H van Noord; Yvonne T van der Schouw; Diederick E Grobbee; Carla H van Gils
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) activity, mammographic density, and oxidative stress: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Chi-Chen Hong; Bing-Kou Tang; Venketeshwer Rao; Sanjiv Agarwal; Lisa Martin; David Tritchler; Martin Yaffe; Norman F Boyd
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  7 in total

1.  Immigration history, lifestyle characteristics, and breast density in the Vietnamese American Women's Health Study: a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Eunjung Lee; Namphuong Doanvo; MiHee Lee; Zayar Soe; Alice W Lee; Cam Van Doan; Dennis Deapen; Giske Ursin; Darcy Spicer; Peggy Reynolds; Anna H Wu
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 2.  Chemical Effects on Breast Development, Function, and Cancer Risk: Existing Knowledge and New Opportunities.

Authors:  Jennifer E Kay; Bethsaida Cardona; Ruthann A Rudel; Laura N Vandenberg; Ana M Soto; Sofie Christiansen; Linda S Birnbaum; Suzanne E Fenton
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2022-08-19

Review 3.  Non-renal effects and the risk assessment of environmental cadmium exposure.

Authors:  Agneta Åkesson; Lars Barregard; Ingvar A Bergdahl; Gunnar F Nordberg; Monica Nordberg; Staffan Skerfving
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Airborne metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in relation to mammographic breast density.

Authors:  Alexandra J White; Clarice R Weinberg; Ellen S O'Meara; Dale P Sandler; Brian L Sprague
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 5.  Environmental exposures during windows of susceptibility for breast cancer: a framework for prevention research.

Authors:  Mary Beth Terry; Karin B Michels; Julia Green Brody; Celia Byrne; Shiuan Chen; D Joseph Jerry; Kristen M C Malecki; Mary Beth Martin; Rachel L Miller; Susan L Neuhausen; Kami Silk; Amy Trentham-Dietz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 8.408

6.  Cadmium and volumetric mammographic density: A cross-sectional study in Polish women.

Authors:  Beata Pepłońska; Beata Janasik; Valerie McCormack; Agnieszka Bukowska-Damska; Paweł Kałużny
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Serum Levels of Commonly Detected Persistent Organic Pollutants and Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) and Mammographic Density in Postmenopausal Women.

Authors:  Eunjung Lee; April Kinninger; Giske Ursin; Chiuchen Tseng; Susan Hurley; Miaomiao Wang; Yunzhu Wang; June-Soo Park; Myrto Petreas; Dennis Deapen; Peggy Reynolds
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.