Literature DB >> 21327370

Surprise influences hindsight-foresight differences in temporal judgments of animated automobile accidents.

Dustin P Calvillo1, Dayna M Gomes.   

Abstract

The hindsight bias occurs when people view an outcome as more foreseeable than it actually was. The role of an outcome's initial surprise in the hindsight bias was examined using animations of automobile accidents. Twenty-six participants rated the initial surprise of accidents' occurring in eight animations. An additional 84 participants viewed these animations in one of two conditions: Half stopped the animations when they were certain an accident would occur (i.e., in foresight), and the other half watched the entire animations first and then stopped the animations when they thought that a naïve viewer would be certain that an accident would occur (i.e., in hindsight). When the accidents were low in initial surprise, there were no foresight-hindsight differences; when initial surprise was medium, there was a hindsight bias; and when initial surprise was high, there was a reversed hindsight bias. The results are consistent with a sense-making model of hindsight bias.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21327370     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0062-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  11 in total

1.  Surprise, defence, or making sense: what removes hindsight bias?

Authors:  Mark V Pezzo
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2003 Jul-Sep

2.  Hindsight not equal to foresight: the effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. 1975.

Authors:  B Fischhoff
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-08

Review 3.  New visual technologies in court: directions for research.

Authors:  Neal Feigenson; Meghan A Dunn
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2003-02

4.  The "saw-it-all-along" effect: demonstrations of visual hindsight bias.

Authors:  Erin M Harley; Keri A Carlsen; Geoffrey R Loftus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  We saw it all along: visual hindsight bias in children and adults.

Authors:  Daniel M Bernstein; Cristina Atance; Geoffrey R Loftus; Andrew Meltzoff
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-04

6.  The propensity effect: when foresight trumps hindsight.

Authors:  Neal J Roese; Florian Fessel; Amy Summerville; Justin Kruger; Michael A Dilich
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-04

7.  Fluency misattribution and visual hindsight bias.

Authors:  Daniel M Bernstein; Erin M Harley
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2007-07

8.  Surprise, memory, and retrospective judgment making: testing cognitive reconstruction theories of the hindsight bias effect.

Authors:  Ivan K Ash
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Increased or reversed? The effect of surprise on hindsight bias depends on the hindsight component.

Authors:  Steffen Nestler; Boris Egloff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Hindsight bias around the world.

Authors:  Rüdiger F Pohl; Michael Bender; Gregor Lachmann
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2002
View more
  2 in total

1.  Auditory hindsight bias.

Authors:  Daniel M Bernstein; Alexander Maurice Wilson; Nicole L M Pernat; Louise R Meilleur
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

2.  Reading about explanations enhances perceptions of inevitability and foreseeability: a cross-cultural study with Wikipedia articles.

Authors:  Aileen Oeberst; Ina von der Beck; Steffen Nestler
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2014-02-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.