Literature DB >> 21326081

A National Cancer Clinical Trials Network: recommendations from the Institute of Medicine.

Sharyl J Nass1, Erin Balogh, John Mendelsohn.   

Abstract

Oncology has become one of the most active areas of drug discovery, with >800 cancer therapeutics in development. This not only presents an unprecedented opportunity to improve the outcome for patients with cancer but also requires an effective and efficient clinical trials network to generate the evidence necessary for regulatory approval and optimal integration of new treatments into clinical care. The Clinical Trials Cooperative Group Program supported by the National Cancer Institute has been instrumental in establishing standards of care in oncology over the last 50 years, but it currently faces numerous challenges that threaten its ability to undertake the large-scale, multi-institutional trials that advance patient care. The Institute of Medicine recently appointed a consensus study committee to assess the organization and operation of the Cooperative Group Program and recommend ways to improve the quality of cancer clinical trials conducted by the Groups and others. The committee developed a set of recommendations, summarized here, that aim to improve the speed and efficiency of trials; incorporate innovative science and trial design; improve prioritization, selection, and support of trials; and increase participation by patients and physicians. (C) 2011 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21326081      PMCID: PMC3135766          DOI: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e3181ff7e23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ther        ISSN: 1075-2765            Impact factor:   2.688


  9 in total

1.  Challenges to National Cancer Institute-Supported Cooperative Group Clinical Trial Participation: An ASCO Survey of Cooperative Group Sites.

Authors:  Allison R Baer; Chelsey A Kelly; Suanna S Bruinooge; Carolyn D Runowicz; Douglas W Blayney
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Assessing the impact of protocol design changes on clinical trial performance.

Authors:  Kenneth A Getz; Julia Wenger; Rafael A Campo; Edward S Seguine; Kenneth I Kaitin
Journal:  Am J Ther       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.688

3.  Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Sylvain Mathieu; Isabelle Boutron; David Moher; Douglas G Altman; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Reducing patient eligibility criteria in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  S L George
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Physician-related factors involved in patient decisions to enroll onto cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Robert L Comis; Jon D Miller; Diane D Colaizzi; Linda G Kimmel
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  A sense of urgency: Evaluating the link between clinical trial development time and the accrual performance of cancer therapy evaluation program (NCI-CTEP) sponsored studies.

Authors:  Steven K Cheng; Mary S Dietrich; David M Dilts
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Public attitudes toward participation in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Robert L Comis; Jon D Miller; Carolyn R Aldigé; Linda Krebs; Ellen Stoval
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Commentary: practicing on the tip of an information iceberg? Evidence of underpublication of registered clinical trials in oncology.

Authors:  Scott Ramsey; John Scoggins
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2008-09-15

9.  American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement on minimum standards and exemplary attributes of clinical trial sites.

Authors:  Robin Zon; Neal J Meropol; Robert B Catalano; Richard L Schilsky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 44.544

  9 in total
  11 in total

Review 1.  Barriers to accrual and enrollment in brain tumor trials.

Authors:  Eudocia Q Lee; Ugonma N Chukwueke; Shawn L Hervey-Jumper; John F de Groot; Jose Pablo Leone; Terri S Armstrong; Susan M Chang; David Arons; Kathy Oliver; Kay Verble; Al Musella; Nicole Willmarth; Brian M Alexander; Amanda Bates; Lisa Doherty; Evanthia Galanis; Sarah Gaffey; Thomas Halkin; Bret E Friday; Maryam Fouladi; Nancy U Lin; David Macdonald; Minesh P Mehta; Marta Penas-Prado; Michael A Vogelbaum; Solmaz Sahebjam; David Sandak; Martin van den Bent; Michael Weller; David A Reardon; Patrick Y Wen
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Cancer drugs in the United States: Justum Pretium--the just price.

Authors:  Hagop M Kantarjian; Tito Fojo; Michael Mathisen; Leonard A Zwelling
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Increasing Minority Enrollment Onto Clinical Trials: Practical Strategies and Challenges Emerge From the NRG Oncology Accrual Workshop.

Authors:  Sandra E Brooks; Carolyn Y Muller; William Robinson; Eleanor M Walker; Kate Yeager; Elise D Cook; Sue Friedman; Carol P Somkin; Carol Leslie Brown; Worta McCaskill-Stevens
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Protocol Development Program: A Novel Approach to Overcoming Barriers to Clinical Research.

Authors:  Tracey J Miller; Vali S Sevastita; Doreen G Chaitt; Jorge A Tavel; Jerome F Pierson
Journal:  Monitor (Assoc Clin Pharmacol)       Date:  2013-02-01

Review 5.  Understanding and addressing the lack of clinical trial enrollment among adolescents with cancer.

Authors:  Eric Tai; Natasha Buchanan; Dena Eliman; Lauren Westervelt; Lynda Beaupin; Silvana Lawvere; Archie Bleyer
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 6.  Leveraging epidemiology and clinical studies of cancer outcomes: recommendations and opportunities for translational research.

Authors:  Joanne W Elena; Lois B Travis; Naoko I Simonds; Christine B Ambrosone; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Smita Bhatia; James R Cerhan; Patricia Hartge; Rebecca S Heist; Lawrence H Kushi; Timothy L Lash; Lindsay M Morton; Kenan Onel; John P Pierce; Leslie L Robison; Julia H Rowland; Deborah Schrag; Thomas A Sellers; Daniela Seminara; Xiao Ou Shu; Nancy E Thomas; Cornelia M Ulrich; Andrew N Freedman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  Reality of evidence-based practice in palliative care.

Authors:  Claire Visser; Gina Hadley; Bee Wee
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.248

8.  Is moderate hypofractionation accepted as a new standard of care in north america for prostate cancer patients treated with external beam radiotherapy? Survey of genitourinary expert radiation oncologists.

Authors:  Shearwood McClelland; Kiri A Sandler; Catherine Degnin; Yiyi Chen; Arthur Y Hung; Timur E Mitin
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

9.  Association of National Cancer Institute-Sponsored Clinical Trial Network Group Studies With Guideline Care and New Drug Indications.

Authors:  Joseph M Unger; Van T Nghiem; Dawn L Hershman; Riha Vaidya; Michael LeBlanc; Charles D Blanke
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-09-04

Review 10.  Systematic review of barriers and facilitators to clinical trial enrollment among adolescents and young adults with cancer: Identifying opportunities for intervention.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Siembida; Holli A Loomans-Kropp; Neha Trivedi; Ann O'Mara; Lillian Sung; Irene Tami-Maury; David R Freyer; Michael Roth
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 6.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.