Literature DB >> 2132585

The prevalence of central presbyacusis in a clinical population.

B A Stach1, M L Spretnjak, J Jerger.   

Abstract

To evaluate the prevalence of central auditory disorder as a function of aging, we analyzed speech audiometric test results on 700 patients, 100 patients from each of seven half-decades beginning at age 50 years. In addition, we evaluated the extent to which prevalence estimates could be explained by the effect of hearing loss on measures of central auditory processing and the difference in prevalence of central presbyacusis between a clinical sample and a nonclinical sample. Results showed that the prevalence of central presbyacusis increased with age and that the highest prevalence was a striking 95 percent in the 80+ year age group. Results also showed that, even when degree of hearing loss and ability to perform the speech audiometric task were equated, the prevalence of central presbyacusis increased systematically with age. Finally, results showed that the prevalence was lower in the nonclinical sample than in the clinical sample at all ages, but that a substantial amount of central presbyacusis existed in the nonclinical subjects, especially in the oldest age groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2132585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  9 in total

Review 1.  Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing: implications for hearing aid fitting and audiologic rehabilitation.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Gurjit Singh
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-03

2.  Development of digital hearing AIDS.

Authors:  C Schweitzer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1997-06

3.  Do group audiologic rehabilitation activities influence psychosocial outcomes?

Authors:  Jill E Preminger; Jae K Yoo
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 1.493

4.  Executive dysfunction and presbycusis in older persons with and without memory loss and dementia.

Authors:  George A Gates; Laura E Gibbons; Susan M McCurry; Susan M McCusrry; Paul K Crane; Martin Patrick Feeney; Eric B Larson
Journal:  Cogn Behav Neurol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.600

5.  Self-Reported Hearing Difficulties Among Adults With Normal Audiograms: The Beaver Dam Offspring Study.

Authors:  Kelly L Tremblay; Alex Pinto; Mary E Fischer; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; Sarah Levy; Ted S Tweed; Karen J Cruickshanks
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Effects of demographic, audiologic, and hearing-aid-related variables on the outcomes of using hearing aids.

Authors:  Xunyi Wang; Yun Zheng; Yiran Liu; Jingzhe Lu; Zhiyuan Cui; Zhen Li
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Can auditory and visual speech perception be trained within a group setting?

Authors:  Jill E Preminger; Craig H Ziegler
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.493

8.  Synaptic Recruitment Enhances Gap Termination Responses in Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Bshara Awwad; Maciej M Jankowski; Israel Nelken
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Separating the Causes of Listening Difficulties in Children.

Authors:  Harvey Dillon; Sharon Cameron
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.