Literature DB >> 21325734

Perceptions of psychosocial hazards, work-related stress and workplace priority risks in developing countries.

Evelyn Kortum1, Stavroula Leka, Tom Cox.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: During the last few decades, major global developments in the world of work include an international trend to shift production to developing countries, with wide variations in working conditions and exposure to traditional and emerging occupational risks, such as psychosocial risks. The latter have rarely been addressed or explored in developing and economically-emerging country contexts while we find an abundant body of research from industrialized countries. The research presented, which is part of a larger study, explored the perception of multi-disciplinary experts from different regions, as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO), of the nature of psychosocial hazards, and work-related stress, as well as their views on workplace priorities that require urgent attention.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 29 experts from developing countries which were subjected to thematic analysis. A two-tiered Delphi survey was completed by 74 experts in the first round with 53 of these experts completing the survey in the second round.
RESULTS: Psychosocial hazards and work-related stress were mostly seen as interchangeable in terms of source and effect and all participants perceived them as concern to their workforce. Through the interviews and the Delphi surveys they allude to our contemporary understanding of psychosocial risks. Workplace risks of priority differed by region but primarily work-related stress, injury and accident prevention, and substance abuse and risk behaviors were reported to require urgent attention.
CONCLUSIONS: The current lack of awareness and research in the area of psychosocial risks and work-related stress hampers action in developing countries. International experts should support the exchange of information and the development of interventions in workplaces in developing countries with a view to integrating these emerging risks into comprehensive occupational health and safety policy frameworks to make such approaches more effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21325734     DOI: 10.1539/joh.o10016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Health        ISSN: 1341-9145            Impact factor:   2.708


  4 in total

1.  Psychometric properties of the Farsi version of effort-reward imbalance questionnaire: a longitudinal study in employees of a synthetic fibre factory in Iran.

Authors:  Ghasem Yadegarfar; Tahereh Alinia; Reihane Hosseini; Razieh Hassannejad; Mahsa Fayaz; Javad Sanati; Kave Sanati; Jalal Harandi; Vahid Hajnoorozali; Mahmood-Reza Baghi; Enayat Mirzavand; Azeem Majeed
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  What Impact Does Accreditation Have on Workplaces? A Qualitative Study to Explore the Perceptions of Healthcare Professionals About the Process of Accreditation.

Authors:  Amna I Alshamsi; Louise Thomson; Angeli Santos
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-07-10

Review 3.  The Global Spine Care Initiative: a narrative review of psychological and social issues in back pain in low- and middle-income communities.

Authors:  Christine Cedraschi; Margareta Nordin; Scott Haldeman; Kristi Randhawa; Deborah Kopansky-Giles; Claire D Johnson; Roger Chou; Eric L Hurwitz; Pierre Côté
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Working Time Society consensus statements: Psychosocial stressors relevant to the health and wellbeing of night and shift workers.

Authors:  Frida Marina Fischer; Aline Silva-Costa; Rosane Harter Griep; Michael H Smolensky; Philip Bohle; Lucia Rotenberg
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.179

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.