Literature DB >> 21325333

Unified effects of aggregation reveal larger prey groups take longer to find.

Christos C Ioannou1, Frederic Bartumeus, Jens Krause, Graeme D Ruxton.   

Abstract

Previous work has suggested that larger groups of prey are more conspicuous to predators. However, this ignores that prey populations are finite. As groups get larger they become fewer, hence the encounter rate between predator and prey decreases with prey aggregation. Here, we present a two-dimensional model based on visual angle to unify these encounter and conspicuousness effects of aggregation. With experimental support using three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.), searching for chironomid larvae, we demonstrate that the increase in visual angle with increasing group size is outweighed by its corresponding decrease as the groups become fewer and thus further away from the searching predator. The net effect is that prey are found with more difficulty when they aggregate, giving an additional anti-predatory benefit to group living rather than a cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21325333      PMCID: PMC3151713          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  11 in total

1.  Visual constraints in foraging bumblebees: flower size and color affect search time and flight behavior.

Authors:  J Spaethe; J Tautz; L Chittka
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Increasing search rate over time may cause a slower than expected increase in prey encounter rate with increasing prey density.

Authors:  Graeme D Ruxton
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  The representation of perceived angular size in human primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Scott O Murray; Huseyin Boyaci; Daniel Kersten
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-02-05       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  The effect of group size on the foraging behaviour of juvenile coho salmon: reduction of predation risk or increased competition?

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Detection of prey flocks by predators.

Authors:  I Vine
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1973-08-15       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  Risk of visual detection and pursuitby a predator and the selective advantage of flocking behaviour.

Authors:  I Vine
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  Spatial processes can determine the relationship between prey encounter rate and prey density.

Authors:  J M J Travis; S C F Palmer
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Multiple benefits of gregariousness cover detectability costs in aposematic aggregations.

Authors:  M Riipi; R V Alatalo; L Lindström; J Mappes
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-10-04       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  A receiver bias in the origin of three-spined stickleback mate choice.

Authors:  Carl Smith; Iain Barber; Robert J Wootton; Lars Chittka
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Detection of patches of coloured discs by bees.

Authors:  Anna M Wertlen; Claudia Niggebrügge; Misha Vorobyev; Natalie Hempel de Ibarra
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  12 in total

1.  Insect density-plant density relationships: a modified view of insect responses to resource concentrations.

Authors:  Petter Andersson; Christer Löfstedt; Peter A Hambäck
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Collective learning from individual experiences and information transfer during group foraging.

Authors:  Andrea Falcón-Cortés; Denis Boyer; Gabriel Ramos-Fernández
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  The effect of aggregation on visibility in open water.

Authors:  Graeme D Ruxton; Sönke Johnsen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Spatial vulnerability: bacterial arrangements, microcolonies, and biofilms as responses to low rather than high phage densities.

Authors:  Stephen T Abedon
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 5.048

5.  Adaptive aggregation by spider mites under predation risk.

Authors:  Lena Dittmann; Peter Schausberger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Marginal predation: do encounter or confusion effects explain the targeting of prey group edges?

Authors:  Callum Duffield; Christos C Ioannou
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 2.671

7.  Density dependent attributes of fish aggregative behaviour.

Authors:  Michaela Holubová; Martin Čech; Mojmír Vašek; Jiří Peterka
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Prey aggregation is an effective olfactory predator avoidance strategy.

Authors:  Asa Johannesen; Alison M Dunn; Lesley J Morrell
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Collective learning and optimal consensus decisions in social animal groups.

Authors:  Albert B Kao; Noam Miller; Colin Torney; Andrew Hartnett; Iain D Couzin
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  The anti-predator role of within-nest emergence synchrony in sea turtle hatchlings.

Authors:  Robson G Santos; Hudson Tercio Pinheiro; Agnaldo Silva Martins; Pablo Riul; Soraya Christina Bruno; Fredric J Janzen; Christos C Ioannou
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.