Literature DB >> 21325330

Structural support, not insulation, is the primary driver for avian cup-shaped nest design.

Caragh B Heenan1, Roger S Seymour.   

Abstract

The nest micro-environment is a widely studied area of avian biology, however, the contribution of nest conductance (the inverse of insulation) to the energetics of the incubating adult and offspring has largely been overlooked. Surface-specific thermal conductance (W °C(-1) cm(-2)) has been related to nest dimensions, wall porosity, height above-ground and altitude, but the most relevant measure is total conductance (G, W °C(-1)). This study is the first to analyse conductance allometrically with adult body mass (M, g), according to the form G = aM(b). We propose three alternative hypotheses to explain the scaling of conductance. The exponent may emerge from: heat loss scaling (M(0.48)) in which G scales with the same exponent as thermal conductance of the adult bird, isometric scaling (M(0.33)) in which nest shape is held constant as parent mass increases, and structural scaling (M(0.25)) in which nests are designed to support a given adult mass. Data from 213 cup-shaped nests, from 36 Australian species weighing 8-360 g, show conductance is proportional to M(0.25). This allometric exponent is significantly different from those expected for heat loss and isometric scaling and confirms the hypothesis that structural support for the eggs and incubating parent is the primary factor driving nest design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21325330      PMCID: PMC3151712          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  3 in total

1.  Re-evaluation of the allometry of wet thermal conductance for birds.

Authors:  E Schleucher; P C Withers
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.320

2.  Resource allocation between reproductive phases: the importance of thermal conditions in determining the cost of incubation.

Authors:  J M Reid; P Monaghan; G D Ruxton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Nest construction by a ground-nesting bird represents a potential trade-off between egg crypticity and thermoregulation.

Authors:  Paul M Mayer; Levica M Smith; Robert G Ford; Dustin C Watterson; Marshall D McCutchen; Mark R Ryan
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 3.225

  3 in total
  7 in total

1.  Large increase in nest size linked to climate change: an indicator of life history, senescence and condition.

Authors:  Anders Pape Møller; Jan Tøttrup Nielsen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Eggs in the freezer: energetic consequences of nest site and nest design in Arctic breeding shorebirds.

Authors:  Ingrid Tulp; Hans Schekkerman; Joep de Leeuw
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The effect of wind on the rate of heat loss from avian cup-shaped nests.

Authors:  Caragh B Heenan; Roger S Seymour
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Adaptive latitudinal variation in Common Blackbird Turdus merula nest characteristics.

Authors:  Mark C Mainwaring; D Charles Deeming; Chris I Jones; Ian R Hartley
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 5.  The design and function of birds' nests.

Authors:  Mark C Mainwaring; Ian R Hartley; Marcel M Lambrechts; D Charles Deeming
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Variation in clutch size in relation to nest size in birds.

Authors:  Anders P Møller; Frank Adriaensen; Alexandr Artemyev; Jerzy Bańbura; Emilio Barba; Clotilde Biard; Jacques Blondel; Zihad Bouslama; Jean-Charles Bouvier; Jordi Camprodon; Francesco Cecere; Anne Charmantier; Motti Charter; Mariusz Cichoń; Camillo Cusimano; Dorota Czeszczewik; Virginie Demeyrier; Blandine Doligez; Claire Doutrelant; Anna Dubiec; Marcel Eens; Tapio Eeva; Bruno Faivre; Peter N Ferns; Jukka T Forsman; Eduardo García-Del-Rey; Aya Goldshtein; Anne E Goodenough; Andrew G Gosler; Iga Góźdź; Arnaud Grégoire; Lars Gustafsson; Ian R Hartley; Philipp Heeb; Shelley A Hinsley; Paul Isenmann; Staffan Jacob; Antero Järvinen; Rimvydas Juškaitis; Erkki Korpimäki; Indrikis Krams; Toni Laaksonen; Bernard Leclercq; Esa Lehikoinen; Olli Loukola; Arne Lundberg; Mark C Mainwaring; Raivo Mänd; Bruno Massa; Tomasz D Mazgajski; Santiago Merino; Cezary Mitrus; Mikko Mönkkönen; Judith Morales-Fernaz; Xavier Morin; Ruedi G Nager; Jan-Åke Nilsson; Sven G Nilsson; Ana C Norte; Markku Orell; Philippe Perret; Carla S Pimentel; Rianne Pinxten; Ilze Priedniece; Marie-Claude Quidoz; Vladimir Remeš; Heinz Richner; Hugo Robles; Seppo Rytkönen; Juan Carlos Senar; Janne T Seppänen; Luís P da Silva; Tore Slagsvold; Tapio Solonen; Alberto Sorace; Martyn J Stenning; János Török; Piotr Tryjanowski; Arie J van Noordwijk; Mikael von Numers; Wiesław Walankiewicz; Marcel M Lambrechts
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  The role of the environment in the evolution of nest shape in Australian passerines.

Authors:  Iliana Medina
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.