Literature DB >> 21325114

Effect of cardiac rehabilitation referral strategies on utilization rates: a prospective, controlled study.

Sherry L Grace1, Kelly L Russell, Robert D Reid, Paul Oh, Sonia Anand, James Rush, Karen Williamson, Milan Gupta, David A Alter, Donna E Stewart.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although cardiac rehabilitation (CR) has been shown to reduce mortality and is a recommended component in clinical practice guidelines, CR referral and utilization rates remain low. Referral strategies have been implemented to increase CR use but have yet to be compared concurrently. To determine the optimal strategy to maximize CR referral, enrollment, and participation, we evaluated 3 referral strategies compared with usual care: "automatic" only via discharge order or electronic record, health care provider liaison only, or a combined approach.
METHODS: In this prospective controlled study, 2635 inpatients with coronary artery disease from 11 Ontario, Canada, hospitals using 1 of the 4 referral strategies completed a sociodemographic survey, and clinical data were extracted from medical charts. One year later, 1809 participants completed a mailed survey that assessed CR utilization. Referral strategies were compared using generalized estimating equations to control for effect of hospital.
RESULTS: Adjusted analyses revealed referral strategy was significantly related to CR referral and enrollment (P<.001). Combined automatic and liaison referral resulted in the greatest CR use (odds ratio [OR], 8.41; 85.8% referral, 73.5% enrollment), followed by automatic only (OR, 3.27; 70.2% referral, 60.0% enrollment), and liaison only (OR, 3.35; 59.0% referral, 50.6% enrollment), compared with usual referral (32.2% referral, 29.0% enrollment). The degree of CR participation did not differ by referral strategy among referred participants (mean [SD] percentage of classes attended, 82.87% [27.20%]; P=.88).
CONCLUSIONS: Automatic referral combined with a patient discussion can achieve among the highest rates of CR referral reported. Wider adoption of such strategies could ensure that 45% more patients being treated for cardiac disease would have access to and realize the benefits of CR. ©2011 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21325114     DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  60 in total

1.  Posttraumatic growth in coronary artery disease outpatients: relationship to degree of trauma and health service use.

Authors:  Yvonne W Leung; David A Alter; Peter L Prior; Donna E Stewart; Jane Irvine; Sherry L Grace
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 2.  Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients with Established Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease: New Directions in the Era of Value-Based Healthcare.

Authors:  Karen Aspry; Wen-Chih Wu; Elena Salmoirago-Blotcher
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.113

3.  Secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in older adults: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Jerome L Fleg; Daniel E Forman; Kathy Berra; Vera Bittner; James A Blumenthal; Michael A Chen; Susan Cheng; Dalane W Kitzman; Mathew S Maurer; Michael W Rich; Win-Kuang Shen; Mark A Williams; Susan J Zieman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Geographic Variation in Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation in Medicare and Veterans Affairs Populations: Opportunity for Improvement.

Authors:  Alexis L Beatty; Michael Truong; David W Schopfer; Hui Shen; Justin M Bachmann; Mary A Whooley
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Referral and use of heart failure clinics: what factors are related to use?

Authors:  Shannon Gravely; Liane Ginsburg; Donna E Stewart; Susanna Mak; Sherry L Grace
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 6.  Clinical research in cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention: looking back and moving forward.

Authors:  Patrick D Savage; Bonnie K Sanderson; Todd M Brown; Kathy Berra; Philip A Ades
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.081

Review 7.  Effect of Socioeconomic Status on Propensity to Change Risk Behaviors Following Myocardial Infarction: Implications for Healthy Lifestyle Medicine.

Authors:  Diann E Gaalema; Rebecca J Elliott; Zachary H Morford; Stephen T Higgins; Philip A Ades
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 8.194

8.  Cardiac Rehabilitation Utilization During an Acute Cardiac Hospitalization: A NATIONAL SAMPLE.

Authors:  Quinn R Pack; Aruna Priya; Tara Lagu; Penelope S Pekow; Robert Berry; Auras R Atreya; Philip A Ades; Peter K Lindenauer
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.081

9.  Participation Rates, Process Monitoring, and Quality Improvement Among Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs in the United States: A NATIONAL SURVEY.

Authors:  Quinn R Pack; Ray W Squires; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez; Steven W Lichtman; Juan P Rodriguez-Escudero; Peter K Lindenauer; Randal J Thomas
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.081

10.  Effect of referral strategies on access to cardiac rehabilitation among women.

Authors:  Shannon Gravely; Sonia S Anand; Donna E Stewart; Sherry L Grace
Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 7.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.