Literature DB >> 21324801

Platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy on moderate- and high-risk stage I and II epithelian ovarian cancer patients. Long-term single institution experience and literature review.

José A García-Sáenz1, Ana Custodio, Antonio Casado, José Antonio Vidart, Pluvio J Coronado, Miguel Martín, Sara López-Tarruella, Javier Puente, Cristina Fernández, Eduardo Díaz-Rubio.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the optimal management of women with FIGO stages I and II epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is still controversial, platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) is the mainstay of treatment. Suboptimal survival results have led to major efforts to identify prognostic factors, improve surgical staging and develop adjuvant therapies to improve patients' outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluate in a retrospective study clinical efficacy and the toxicity profile of a platinum-based adjuvant CT in FIGO stages I and II EOC treated at our institution from March 1984 to December 2006. Grade I FIGO stages IA-IB were excluded from the analysis. In the first period (1984-1997), patients received a platinum-based regimen without taxanes. In the second period from 1997 onwards, patients were treated with carboplatin and paclitaxel. Four to six cycles of adjuvant CT were administered. Potential predictive factors of efficacy and the role of paclitaxel addition were also analysed.
RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-eight patients (60 treated with paclitaxel) met inclusion criteria and were evaluable. Median age at diagnosis was 53.7 years (range 19-81) and most patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score (ECOG) of 0-1 (91.8%); 82.9% patients had pathological stage I and 17.1% pathological stage II. With a median follow up of 8.34 years (range 4.4-11.6), 103 patients (74.1%) were free of disease and 110 of them were alive (79.1%). Median relapse-free survival (RFS) and median overall survival (OS) had not been reached at the time of the analysis. No survival difference was found between paclitaxel and carboplatin combination or non-paclitaxel-containing regimens. Statistically significant prognostic factors for better RFS in the multivariate analysis were: ECOG 0 (p=0.023; HR 0.32; 95% CI 0.17-0.57); FIGO I stage (p<0.001; HR 0.30; 95% CI 0.15-0.58); I-II histological grade (p=0.005; HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.19-0.75); mucinous histology (p=0.013; HR 0.28; 95% CI 0.13-0.53); non-surgical adherences (p<0.002, HR 0.32; 95% CI 0.15-0.54); paracolic gutters inspection (p=0.033; HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.26-0.95) and liver surface biopsies (p=0.048; HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.41-0.98).Toxicity was generally mild and non-haematologic events were the most commonly found (62.9% of the total). The most frequent haematologic toxicities were neutropenia (41.7% in all grades, 9.5% grade 3-4) and anaemia (29.1% in all grades, 3.2% grade 3-4).
CONCLUSIONS: The long-term outcome of this series is comparable to the published evidence and reflects the limited activity of platinum-based CT in the adjuvant setting. The potential survival advantage of the addition of paclitaxel to carboplatin cannot be definitively answered due to the small number of patients, the limited follow-up and the retrospective nature of the study. More effective and specific treatments are clearly required, in particular for those patients with stage II and undifferentiated tumours. Quality of surgery entails prognostic value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21324801     DOI: 10.1007/s12094-011-0629-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol        ISSN: 1699-048X            Impact factor:   3.405


  50 in total

1.  Ovarian cancer staging: does it require a gynecologic oncologist?

Authors:  A R Mayer; S K Chambers; E Graves; C Holm; P C Tseng; B E Nelson; P E Schwartz
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Adjuvant treatment for early epithelial ovarian cancer: results of two randomised clinical trials comparing cisplatin to no further treatment or chromic phosphate (32P). G.I.C.O.G.: Gruppo Interregionale Collaborativo in Ginecologia Oncologica.

Authors:  G Bolis; N Colombo; S Pecorelli; V Torri; S Marsoni; C Bonazzi; S Chiari; G Favalli; G Mangili; M Presti
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Randomized study on adjuvant chemotherapy in stage I high-risk ovarian cancer with evaluation of DNA-ploidy as prognostic instrument.

Authors:  C Tropé; J Kaern; T Hogberg; V Abeler; B Hagen; G Kristensen; M Onsrud; E Pettersen; P Rosenberg; R Sandvei; K Sundfor; I Vergote
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Randomized study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Ovarian Cancer Study Group comparing quality of life in patients with ovarian cancer treated with cisplatin/paclitaxel versus carboplatin/paclitaxel.

Authors:  Elfriede R Greimel; Vesna Bjelic-Radisic; Jacobus Pfisterer; Felix Hilpert; Fedor Daghofer; Andreas du Bois
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Expression of cyclooxygenase 2 is an independent prognostic factor in human ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Carsten Denkert; Martin Köbel; Sören Pest; Ines Koch; Stefan Berger; Michael Schwabe; Antje Siegert; Angela Reles; Bernd Klosterhalfen; Steffen Hauptmann
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  The accuracy of staging: an important prognostic determinator in stage I ovarian carcinoma. A multivariate analysis.

Authors:  G Zanetta; S Rota; S Chiari; C Bonazzi; G Bratina; V Torri; C Mangioni
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Randomized trial of cyclophosphamide plus cisplatin with or without doxorubicin in ovarian carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

Authors:  G A Omura; B N Bundy; J S Berek; S Curry; G Delgado; R Mortel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Randomized trial comparing cisplatin with radioactive phosphorus or whole-abdomen irradiation as adjuvant treatment of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  I B Vergote; L N Vergote-De Vos; V M Abeler; M Aas; M W Lindegaard; K E Kjørstad; C G Tropé
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  The West Midlands epithelial ovarian cancer adjuvant therapy trial.

Authors:  C W Redman; J Mould; J Warwick; T Rollason; D M Luesley; J Budden; F G Lawton; G R Blackledge; K K Chan
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.126

10.  Staging laparotomy in early ovarian cancer.

Authors:  R C Young; D G Decker; J T Wharton; M S Piver; W F Sindelar; B K Edwards; J P Smith
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-12-09       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  3 in total

1.  Early-stage ovarian cancer management: still a challenge.

Authors:  Antonio González Martín
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  S3-Guideline on Diagnostics, Therapy and Follow-up of Malignant Ovarian Tumours: Short version 1.0 - AWMF registration number: 032/035OL, June 2013.

Authors:  U Wagner; P Harter; F Hilpert; S Mahner; A Reuß; A du Bois; E Petru; W Meier; P Ortner; K König; K Lindel; D Grab; P Piso; O Ortmann; I Runnebaum; J Pfisterer; D Lüftner; N Frickhofen; F Grünwald; B O Maier; J Diebold; S Hauptmann; F Kommoss; G Emons; B Radeleff; M Gebhardt; N Arnold; G Calaminus; I Weisse; J Weis; J Sehouli; D Fink; A Burges; A Hasenburg; C Eggert
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Survival benefit of patients with early-stage ovarian carcinoma treated with paclitaxel chemotherapeutic regimens.

Authors:  Chien An Chen; Chun Ju Chiang; Yun Yuan Chen; San Lin You; Shu Feng Hsieh; Chao Hsiun Tang; Wen Fang Cheng
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.401

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.