| Literature DB >> 21324201 |
Hong-zhu Li1, Jin Guo, Jun Gao, Li-ping Han, Chun-ming Jiang, Hong-xia Li, Shu-zhi Bai, Wei-hua Zhang, Guang-wei Li, Li-na Wang, Hong Li, Ya-jun Zhao, Yan Lin, Ye Tian, Guang-dong Yang, Rui Wang, Ling-yun Wu, Bao-feng Yang, Chang-qing Xu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury is the major cause of morbidity and mortality for cardiovascular diseases. Dopamine D2 receptors are expressed in cardiac tissues. However, the roles of dopamine D2 receptors in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury and cardiomyocyte apoptosis are unclear. Here we investigated the effects of both dopamine D2 receptors agonist (bromocriptine) and antagonist (haloperidol) on apoptosis of cultured neonatal rat ventricular myocytes induced by ischemia/reperfusion injury.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21324201 PMCID: PMC3050795 DOI: 10.1186/1423-0127-18-18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Sci ISSN: 1021-7770 Impact factor: 8.410
The levels of LDH and MDA as well as SOD activity in Culture medium from different groups
| Groups | LDH (U/mL) | SOD (U/mL) | MDA (nmol/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 29.7 ± 2.2 | 36.1 ± 1.2 | 8.8 ± 0.6 |
| I/R | 56.4 ± 1.8a | 30.4 ± 2.3a | 17.4 ± 1.2a |
| Bromocriptine | 44.3 ± 2.3c | 36.6 ± 2.1c | 14.2 ± 0.8b |
| Haloperidol | 58.1 ± 1.9 | 31.7 ± 2.1 | 17.2 ± 1.3 |
Data are means ± S.E.M. of 10 determinations. aP < 0.01 versus control; bP < 0.05, cP < 0.01 versus ischemia/reperfusion (I/R).
Figure 1The effects of dopamine D. Cardiomyocytes were subjected to 2 h of simulated ischemia, and then incubated under normal conditions in the presence or absence of 10 μM bromocriptine or haloperidol for 24 h. The data are means ± S.E.M. of five determinations.▼▼P < 0.01 versus control; ★★P < 0.01 versus ischemia/reperfusion. (A) MTT assay for cell viability. (B) DNA fragmentation determined by quantitative TUNEL staining of apoptotic cardiomyocytes. (C) Flow cytometry analysis.
Figure 2Ultrastructural changes in cardiomyocytes. (A) Control group; (B) ischemia/reperfusion group; (C) The bromocriptine-treated group; and (D) The haloperidol-treated group (magnification ×8000). In the ischemia/reperfusion group, nuclear chromatin margination, aggregation, and condensation and mitochondrial swelling and vacuolisation were observed. There was no significant change in nuclear chromatin in the control group. Cardiomyocyte injury was lessened in the bromocriptine-treated group compared with the ischemia/reperfusion group but was not significantly changed in the haloperidol-treated group.
Figure 3Changes of intracellular free calcium concentration. (A) Fluorescent images of cardiomyocytes incubated in DMEM, or incubated in simulated ischemia solution and re-incubated in DMEM in the presence or absence of 10 μM bromocriptine or haloperidol, respectively. (B) Changes in fluorescent intensities of intracellular Ca2+ in different treatment groups were recorded continuously with confocal laser scanning microscopy. Intracellular Ca2+ was recorded for a total of 98 min. ★P < 0.05 versus ischemia/reperfusion.
Figure 4Expression of DR2. The intensity of each band was quantified by densitometry, and data were normalized to the β-actin signal. The expression levels in the control group were considered the basal levels, and the others are expressed as fold change from the control group. The fold change values represent the means ± S.E.M. of five determinations. ▼▼P < 0.01 versus control.
Figure 5Expression of caspase-9 (A), release of cytochrome . The intensity of each band was quantified by densitometry, and data were normalized to the β-actin signal. The expression levels in the control group were considered the basal levels, and the others are expressed as fold change from the control group. The fold change values represent the means ± S.E.M. of five determinations. ▼▼P < 0.01 versus control; ★★P < 0.01 versus ischemia/reperfusion.
Figure 6Expression of Fas (A), Fas-L (B) and caspase-3 (C) determined by Western blot analysis. The intensity of each band was quantified by densitometry, and data were normalized to the β-actin signal. The expression levels in the control group were considered the basal levels, and the others are expressed as fold change from the control group. The fold change values represent the means ± S.E.M. of five determinations. ▼▼P < 0.01 versus control; ★P < 0.05, ★★P < 0.01 versus ischemia/reperfusion.