AIM: To gain insight into and generate theoretical knowledge about the processes involved when insulin pump-treated adolescents take or miss taking their bolus doses. BACKGROUND: Insulin pump treatment is considered the most physiological way to imitate the healthy body's insulin profile in adolescents with diabetes. Despite insulin pump treatment, it is hard to maintain near-normal glucose control in adolescents; one reason for this is missed bolus doses with meals. METHOD: In this qualitative interview study, the grounded theory method was chosen as a model for the collection and analysis of data. Twelve adolescents (five boys and seven girls, mean age: 14·4 years, range: 12-19 years) from different Swedish paediatric diabetes clinics, four parents and one paediatric diabetes nurse were interviewed during 2008 and 2009. Two adolescents and two parents were re-interviewed after approximately 10 months. Data from clinical visits and diabetes camps were used to verify emerging categories. FINDINGS: Responsibility in the context of taking or missing bolus doses emerged as the core category. It is elaborated and explained through three subcategories: distribution of responsibility, transfer of responsibility and clarification of responsibility. The findings describe the need to clarify the responsibility for diabetes self-management in continuous negotiations between adolescents and parents to avoid missed doses. CONCLUSION: Negotiations to clarify the responsibility for diabetes self-management must be a continuous process between adolescents and parents. Diabetes care teams can facilitate and encourage these negotiations.
AIM: To gain insight into and generate theoretical knowledge about the processes involved when insulin pump-treated adolescents take or miss taking their bolus doses. BACKGROUND:Insulin pump treatment is considered the most physiological way to imitate the healthy body's insulin profile in adolescents with diabetes. Despite insulin pump treatment, it is hard to maintain near-normal glucose control in adolescents; one reason for this is missed bolus doses with meals. METHOD: In this qualitative interview study, the grounded theory method was chosen as a model for the collection and analysis of data. Twelve adolescents (five boys and seven girls, mean age: 14·4 years, range: 12-19 years) from different Swedish paediatric diabetes clinics, four parents and one paediatric diabetes nurse were interviewed during 2008 and 2009. Two adolescents and two parents were re-interviewed after approximately 10 months. Data from clinical visits and diabetes camps were used to verify emerging categories. FINDINGS: Responsibility in the context of taking or missing bolus doses emerged as the core category. It is elaborated and explained through three subcategories: distribution of responsibility, transfer of responsibility and clarification of responsibility. The findings describe the need to clarify the responsibility for diabetes self-management in continuous negotiations between adolescents and parents to avoid missed doses. CONCLUSION: Negotiations to clarify the responsibility for diabetes self-management must be a continuous process between adolescents and parents. Diabetes care teams can facilitate and encourage these negotiations.
Authors: Anna Lena Brorsson; Anna Lindholm Olinder; Gunnel Viklund; Therese Granström; Janeth Leksell Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2017-11-26
Authors: Eileen R Faulds; Margaret Grey; Heather Tubbs-Cooley; Robert P Hoffman; Lisa K Militello; Alai Tan; Mary Beth Happ Journal: Pediatr Diabetes Date: 2021-08-15 Impact factor: 4.866
Authors: Julia Lawton; Ruth I Hart; Barbara Kimbell; Janet M Allen; Rachel Elizabeth Jane Besser; Charlotte Boughton; Daniela Elleri; Julia Fuchs; Atrayee Ghatak; Tabitha Randell; Ajay Thankamony; Nicola Trevelyan; Roman Hovorka; David Rankin Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2021-04-13 Impact factor: 6.118