Anne Mette Buhl1,2, Danelle F James2,3, Donna Neuberg3,4, Sonia Jain5, Laura Z Rassenti2,3, Thomas J Kipps2,3. 1. Department of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. 2. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Moores UCSD Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA. 3. The CLL Research Consortium, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA. 4. Department of Biostatics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA. 5. Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, UCSD, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is incurable, but therapy leading to eradication of minimal residual disease (MRD) in CLL is associated with improved clinical outcomes. CLL upregulated gene 1 (CLLU1) is solely upregulated in CLL patient samples. We hypothesized that CLLU1 could be used to monitor for residual disease in CLL patient samples after therapy. METHODS: We examined whether the CLLU1 real-time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR) could detect small numbers of CLL cells in mixtures of normal peripheral blood mononuclear (PBMC) cells. We then performed a retrospective analysis on time-matched cryo-preserved specimens from patients who achieved MRD-negative remissions that underwent serial marrow biopsies for evaluation of residual disease by 4-color flow cytometry. RNA from PBMC samples collected at the time of the marrow assessments was analyzed for CLLU1. Nine patients underwent a total of 46 paired blood and marrow evaluations (median 5 assessments per patient). RESULTS: CLLU1 RQ-PCR on PBMCs of healthy donors reconstituted with varying amounts of CLL cells demonstrated leukemia cells could be reliably detected with high sensitivities depending on the CLLU1 expression level. Analysis of time-matched samples assessed for CLLU1 levels in the blood by RQ-PCR and residual disease of the marrow determined by 4-color flow cytometry revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.96 (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The CLLU1 RQ-PCR is a sensitive and specific assay for detecting residual CLL cells after therapy. Assessment of blood CLLU1 levels can be used as a reliable marker of tumor burden and has the potential to complement currently used techniques for MRD monitoring in patients with CLL.
OBJECTIVE:Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is incurable, but therapy leading to eradication of minimal residual disease (MRD) in CLL is associated with improved clinical outcomes. CLL upregulated gene 1 (CLLU1) is solely upregulated in CLL patient samples. We hypothesized that CLLU1 could be used to monitor for residual disease in CLL patient samples after therapy. METHODS: We examined whether the CLLU1 real-time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR) could detect small numbers of CLL cells in mixtures of normal peripheral blood mononuclear (PBMC) cells. We then performed a retrospective analysis on time-matched cryo-preserved specimens from patients who achieved MRD-negative remissions that underwent serial marrow biopsies for evaluation of residual disease by 4-color flow cytometry. RNA from PBMC samples collected at the time of the marrow assessments was analyzed for CLLU1. Nine patients underwent a total of 46 paired blood and marrow evaluations (median 5 assessments per patient). RESULTS: CLLU1 RQ-PCR on PBMCs of healthy donors reconstituted with varying amounts of CLL cells demonstrated leukemia cells could be reliably detected with high sensitivities depending on the CLLU1 expression level. Analysis of time-matched samples assessed for CLLU1 levels in the blood by RQ-PCR and residual disease of the marrow determined by 4-color flow cytometry revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.96 (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The CLLU1 RQ-PCR is a sensitive and specific assay for detecting residual CLL cells after therapy. Assessment of blood CLLU1 levels can be used as a reliable marker of tumor burden and has the potential to complement currently used techniques for MRD monitoring in patients with CLL.
Authors: M Hallek; K Fischer; G Fingerle-Rowson; A M Fink; R Busch; J Mayer; M Hensel; G Hopfinger; G Hess; U von Grünhagen; M Bergmann; J Catalano; P L Zinzani; F Caligaris-Cappio; J F Seymour; A Berrebi; U Jäger; B Cazin; M Trneny; A Westermann; C M Wendtner; B F Eichhorst; P Staib; A Bühler; D Winkler; T Zenz; S Böttcher; M Ritgen; M Mendila; M Kneba; H Döhner; S Stilgenbauer Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-10-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: John C Byrd; John G Gribben; Bercedis L Peterson; Michael R Grever; Gerard Lozanski; David M Lucas; Ben Lampson; Richard A Larson; Michael A Caligiuri; Nyla A Heerema Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-12-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Andrea Baccarelli; Ruth Pfeiffer; Dario Consonni; Angela C Pesatori; Matteo Bonzini; Donald G Patterson; Pier Alberto Bertazzi; Maria Teresa Landi Journal: Chemosphere Date: 2005-03-02 Impact factor: 7.086
Authors: Anne Mette Buhl; Jesper Jurlander; Flemming S Jørgensen; Anne Marie Ottesen; Jack B Cowland; Lise Mette Gjerdrum; Brian V Hansen; Henrik Leffers Journal: Blood Date: 2005-12-08 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Paul Moreton; Ben Kennedy; Guy Lucas; Michael Leach; Saad M B Rassam; Andrew Haynes; Jane Tighe; David Oscier; Christopher Fegan; Andy Rawstron; Peter Hillmen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-02-28 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jacques-Louis Binet; Federico Caligaris-Cappio; Daniel Catovsky; Bruce Cheson; Tom Davis; Guillaume Dighiero; Hartmut Döhner; Michael Hallek; Peter Hillmen; Michael Keating; Emili Montserrat; Thomas J Kipps; Kanti Rai Journal: Blood Date: 2005-10-13 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: A C Rawstron; N Villamor; M Ritgen; S Böttcher; P Ghia; J L Zehnder; G Lozanski; D Colomer; C Moreno; M Geuna; P A S Evans; Y Natkunam; S E Coutre; E D Avery; L Z Rassenti; T J Kipps; F Caligaris-Cappio; M Kneba; J C Byrd; M J Hallek; E Montserrat; P Hillmen Journal: Leukemia Date: 2007-03-15 Impact factor: 11.528