Tong Xu1, Kaijie He, Lina Wang, Amir Goldkorn. 1. Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine and Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cancer progenitor cells (CPCs) have been postulated to promote treatment resistance and disease progression in prostate and other malignancies. We investigated whether the enzyme telomerase, which is active in cancer cells and in normal stem cells, plays an important role in CPC which can be exploited to neutralize these cells. METHODS: We used flow cytometry and assays of gene expression, clonogenicity, and invasiveness to isolate and characterize a putative CPC subpopulation from freshly resected human prostatectomy specimens. Telomerase activity was measured by qPCR-based Telomeric Repeat Amplification Protocol (TRAP). Telomerase interference was achieved by ectopic expression of a mutated telomerase RNA construct which reprograms telomerase to generate "toxic" uncapped telomeres. Treated cells were assayed for apoptosis, proliferation in culture, and xenograft tumor formation. RESULTS: CPC in prostate tumors expressed elevated levels of genes associated with a progenitor phenotype and were highly clonogenic and invasive. Significantly, CPC telomerase activity was 20- to 200-fold higher than in non-CPC from the same tumors, and CPC were exquisitely sensitive to telomerase interference which induced rapid apoptosis and growth inhibition. Similarly, induction of telomerase interference in highly tumorigenic CPC isolated from a prostate cancer cell line abrogated their ability to form tumor xenografts. CONCLUSIONS: Human prostate tumors contain a CPC subpopulation with markedly elevated telomerase activity which renders them acutely susceptible to telomerase interference. These findings offer the first tumor-derived and in vivo evidence that telomerase may constitute a CPC "Achilles heel" which may ultimately form the basis for more effective new CPC-targeting therapies.
BACKGROUND:Cancer progenitor cells (CPCs) have been postulated to promote treatment resistance and disease progression in prostate and other malignancies. We investigated whether the enzyme telomerase, which is active in cancer cells and in normal stem cells, plays an important role in CPC which can be exploited to neutralize these cells. METHODS: We used flow cytometry and assays of gene expression, clonogenicity, and invasiveness to isolate and characterize a putative CPC subpopulation from freshly resected human prostatectomy specimens. Telomerase activity was measured by qPCR-based Telomeric Repeat Amplification Protocol (TRAP). Telomerase interference was achieved by ectopic expression of a mutated telomerase RNA construct which reprograms telomerase to generate "toxic" uncapped telomeres. Treated cells were assayed for apoptosis, proliferation in culture, and xenograft tumor formation. RESULTS:CPC in prostate tumors expressed elevated levels of genes associated with a progenitor phenotype and were highly clonogenic and invasive. Significantly, CPC telomerase activity was 20- to 200-fold higher than in non-CPC from the same tumors, and CPC were exquisitely sensitive to telomerase interference which induced rapid apoptosis and growth inhibition. Similarly, induction of telomerase interference in highly tumorigenic CPC isolated from a prostate cancer cell line abrogated their ability to form tumor xenografts. CONCLUSIONS:Humanprostate tumors contain a CPC subpopulation with markedly elevated telomerase activity which renders them acutely susceptible to telomerase interference. These findings offer the first tumor-derived and in vivo evidence that telomerase may constitute a CPC "Achilles heel" which may ultimately form the basis for more effective new CPC-targeting therapies.
Authors: Donald J Vander Griend; Wouter L Karthaus; Susan Dalrymple; Alan Meeker; Angelo M DeMarzo; John T Isaacs Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2008-12-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Delphine T Marie-Egyptienne; Marie Eve Brault; Graeme A M Nimmo; J Arturo Londoño-Vallejo; Chantal Autexier Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2008-12-03 Impact factor: 8.679
Authors: George J Klarmann; Elaine M Hurt; Lesley A Mathews; Xiaohu Zhang; Maria A Duhagon; Tashan Mistree; Suneetha B Thomas; William L Farrar Journal: Clin Exp Metastasis Date: 2009-02-17 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: Anna Dubrovska; Sungeun Kim; Richard J Salamone; John R Walker; Sauveur-Michel Maira; Carlos García-Echeverría; Peter G Schultz; Venkateshwar A Reddy Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-12-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Elsa Quintana; Mark Shackleton; Michael S Sabel; Douglas R Fullen; Timothy M Johnson; Sean J Morrison Journal: Nature Date: 2008-12-04 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Sara Sandri; Francesco De Sanctis; Alessia Lamolinara; Federico Boschi; Ornella Poffe; Rosalinda Trovato; Alessandra Fiore; Sara Sartori; Andrea Sbarbati; Attilio Bondanza; Simone Cesaro; Mauro Krampera; Maria T Scupoli; Michael I Nishimura; Manuela Iezzi; Silvia Sartoris; Vincenzo Bronte; Stefano Ugel Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2017-05-23