Literature DB >> 21321641

[Randomized clinical case-control trial for the comparison of docetaxel plus thiotepa versus docetaxel plus capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer].

Jing Yu1, Li jun DI, Guo hong Song, Li Che, Han fang Jiang, Yu lin Zhu, Xu Liang, Jun Jia, Jie Zhang, Hua bing Yang, Xiao li Wang, Xin na Zhou, Jun Ren.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel plus thiotepa(TXT/TSPA) and docetaxel plus capecitabine(TXT/CAPE) in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
METHODS: The patients were randomized to give intravenous TXT 35 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 plus intravenous TSPA 60-65 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 3 weeks, or intravenous TXT 35 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 plus oral CAPE 1 000 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks, at least 2 cycles applied.
RESULTS: TXT/TSPA group (22 patients) and TXT/CAPE group (24 patients) had consistent baseline. Docetaxel thiotepa group (21 cases) and docetaxel combined with capecitabine group (22 cases) were evaluated for their clinical responses, which showed that 2 of the 21 (9.52%) from TXT/TSPA group and 6 of the 22 (27.27%) from TXT/CAPE group had achieved partial remission; 11 of the 21 (52.38%) from TXT/TSPA group versus 7 of the 22 (31.82%) from TXT/CAPE group for stable diseases; 8 of the 21 (38.10%) from TXT/TSPA group versus and 9 of the 22 (40.91%) from TXT/CAPE group for progressive diseases, respectively. The disease control rate was 61.90% (13/21) and 59.09% (13/22) for TXT/TSPA and TXT/CAPE groups, the median progression-free survival(PFS) was 7.9 months [95% confidence interval(CI) 0.77 to 15.03] from TXT/TSPA group versus 8.3 months (95% CI 4.01 to 11.79) from TXT/CAPE group. One year survival rate was 88.20% for TXT/TSPA versus 81.00% for TXT/CAPE group, respectively. P values all exceeded 0.05, and the two groups showed no difference. No chemotherapy-related deaths occurred. Myelosuppression was the major side effect. The adverse events of grades 3 to 4 respectively occurred in TXT/TSPA and TXT/CAPE groups:leucocytopenia was 45.45% vs. 26.09%; neutropenia 45.45% vs. 21.74%; thrombocytopenia 9.09% vs. 0%; hand-foot syndrome 0% vs. 13.04%. P values all exceeded 0.05, and the two groups showed no difference.
CONCLUSION: Combination of docetaxel and thiotepa in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer has some curative effect and adverse reactions can be tolerated. It can be used as an economical and effective rescue plan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21321641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban        ISSN: 1671-167X


  4 in total

1.  Capecitabine in Combination with Docetaxel in First Line in HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: an Observational Study.

Authors:  Renáta Kószó; Dóra Sántha; László Büdi; József Erfán; Károly Győrfy; Zsolt Horváth; Judit Kocsis; László Landherr; Erika Hitre; Károly Máhr; Gábor Pajkos; Zsuzsanna Pápai; Zsuzsanna Kahán
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  Selections of appropriate regimen of high-dose chemotherapy combined with adoptive cellular therapy with dendritic and cytokine-induced killer cells improved progression-free and overall survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer: reargument of such contentious therapeutic preferences.

Authors:  Jun Ren; Lijun Di; Guohong Song; Jing Yu; Jun Jia; Yuling Zhu; Ying Yan; Hanfang Jiang; Xu Liang; Li Che; Jie Zhang; Fengling Wan; Xiaoli Wang; Xinna Zhou; Herbert Kim Lyerly
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Capecitabine for hormone receptor-positive versus hormone receptor-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Siao-Nge Hoon; Peter Kh Lau; Alison M White; Max K Bulsara; Patricia D Banks; Andrew D Redfern
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-26

4.  The prognostic values of CYP2B6 genetic polymorphisms and metastatic sites for advanced breast cancer patients treated with docetaxel and thiotepa.

Authors:  Qingkun Song; Xinna Zhou; Jing Yu; Ningning Dong; Xiaoli Wang; Huabing Yang; Jun Ren; H Kim Lyerly
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.