Literature DB >> 2132133

Combined epidural and general anesthesia for abdominal aortic surgery.

C Her1, G Kizelshteyn, V Walker, D Hayes, D E Lees.   

Abstract

The hypothesis that combined epidural and light general anesthesia for infrarenal abdominal aortic surgery is associated with a more stable intraoperative course and less postoperative morbidity than general anesthesia alone was tested. The authors compared intraoperative hemodynamic variables and postoperative morbidity between a group with combined epidural and general anesthesia (n = 30) and a group with general anesthesia (n = 19). Patients who had combined epidural and general anesthesia were given epidural bupivacaine intraoperatively and epidural morphine postoperatively. After cross-clamping of the aorta, cardiac index and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure did not change in the group with combined epidural and general anesthesia, whereas cardiac index decreased (mean change, 0.30 L/min/m2; P = 0.0006) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure increased (mean change, 1 mm Hg; P = 0.007) in the group with general anesthesia. After unclamping, cardiac index increased in both groups (mean change, 0.26 L/min/m2, P = 0.002, and 0.30 L/min/m2, P = 0.001, respectively). Postoperatively, the necessity for ventilatory support and the incidence of respiratory failure were lower in the combined epidural and general anesthesia group than in the general anesthesia group (P = 0.0002 and P = 0.018, respectively). In addition, vasodilator therapy was required less frequently in the group with combined epidural and general anesthesia (P = 0.002). Duration of intensive care unit stay was shorter in the combined epidural and general anesthesia group (2.7 days v 3.8 days, P = 0.003). These data indicate that for infrarenal abdominal aortic surgery, combined epidural and general anesthesia is associated with more stable intraoperative hemodynamics and significantly less postoperative morbidity than general anesthesia alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2132133     DOI: 10.1016/0888-6296(90)90403-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiothorac Anesth        ISSN: 0888-6296


  5 in total

Review 1.  The role of epidural anesthesia and analgesia in surgical practice.

Authors:  Robert J Moraca; David G Sheldon; Richard C Thirlby
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Anesthesia.

Authors:  J Appleby; V A Lawrence
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Perioperative ischaemia in aortic surgery: combined epidural/general anaesthesia and epidural analgesia vs general anaesthesia and i.v. analgesia.

Authors:  R L Garnett; A MacIntyre; P Lindsay; G G Barber; C W Cole; G Hajjar; N V McPhail; T D Ruddy; R Stark; D Boisvert
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 4.  Epidural pain relief versus systemic opioid-based pain relief for abdominal aortic surgery.

Authors:  Joanne Guay; Sandra Kopp
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-05

Review 5.  Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens for postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, vomiting and pain after abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Joanne Guay; Mina Nishimori; Sandra Kopp
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.