UNLABELLED: Bombesin is a 14-amino-acid amphibian peptide that binds with high affinity to the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR), which is overexpressed on a variety of solid tumors. It has been demonstrated that bombesin analogs can be radiolabeled with a variety of radiometals for potential diagnosis and treatment of GRPR-positive tumors. In this regard, several studies have used different chelators conjugated to the 8 C-terminal amino acids of bombesin(7-14) for radiolabeling with (64)Cu. These analogs have demonstrated GRPR-specific small-animal PET of tumors but have various advantages and disadvantages. The objective of this study was to conjugate the previously described (1-N-(4-aminobenzyl)-3,6,10,13,16,19-hexaazabicyclo[6.6.6]-eicosane-1,8-diamine) (SarAr) chelator to bombesin(7-14), radiolabel the conjugate with (64)Cu, and evaluate in vitro and in vivo. METHODS: SarAr was synthesized as previously published and conjugated to bombesin(7-14) by solid-phase peptide synthesis using standard Fmoc chemistry. Succinic acid (SA), 8-aminooctanoic acid (Aoc), and Gly-Ser-Gly (GSG) were used as linkers between SarAr and bombesin(7-14) to yield the resulting SarAr-SA-Aoc-bombesin(7-14) and SarAr-SA-Aoc-GSG-bombesin(7-14) peptides. The unlabeled peptides were evaluated in a competitive binding assay using PC-3 prostate cancer cells and (125)I-Tyr(4)-bombesin to determine the inhibitory concentration of 50%. The peptides were radiolabeled with (64)Cu and evaluated for internalization into PC-3 cells in vitro and for in vivo tumor uptake in mice bearing PC-3 xenografts using biodistribution and small-animal PET/CT studies. RESULTS: The competitive binding assay demonstrated that both SarAr-SA-Aoc-bombesin(7-14) and SarAr-SA-Aoc-GSG-bombesin(7-14) bound with high affinity to GRPR with an inhibitory concentration of 50% of 3.5 and 4.5 nM, respectively. Both peptides were radiolabeled with (64)Cu at room temperature without further purification and demonstrated similar internalization into PC-3 cells. In vivo, the radiolabeled peptides demonstrated tumor-specific uptake (13.0 and 8.5 percentage injected dose per gram for (64)Cu-SarAr-SA-Aoc-bombesin(7-14) and (64)Cu-SarAr-SA-Aoc-GSG-bombesin(7-14), respectively, at 1 h) and imaging that was comparable to, or better than, that of the previously reported (64)Cu-labeled bombesin analogs. The (64)Cu-SarAr-SA-Aoc-GSG-bombesin(7-14) had more rapid blood clearance and lower tumor and normal-tissue uptake than (64)Cu-SarAr-SA-Aoc-bombesin(7-14), resulting in similar tumor-to-blood ratios for each analog (15.1 vs. 11.3 for (64)Cu-SarAr-SA-Aoc-bombesin(7-14) and (64)Cu-SarAr-SA-Aoc-GSG-bombesin(7-14), respectively, at 1 h). CONCLUSION: These studies demonstrate that (64)Cu-SarAr-SA-Aoc-bombesin(7-14) and (64)Cu-SarAr-SA-Aoc-GSG-bombesin(7-14) bound with high affinity to GRPR-expressing cells and that these peptides can be used for PET of GRPR-expressing prostate cancer.
UNLABELLED: Bombesin is a 14-amino-acid amphibian peptide that binds with high affinity to the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR), which is overexpressed on a variety of solid tumors. It has been demonstrated that bombesin analogs can be radiolabeled with a variety of radiometals for potential diagnosis and treatment of GRPR-positive tumors. In this regard, several studies have used different chelators conjugated to the 8 C-terminal amino acids of bombesin(7-14) for radiolabeling with (64)Cu. These analogs have demonstrated GRPR-specific small-animal PET of tumors but have various advantages and disadvantages. The objective of this study was to conjugate the previously described (1-N-(4-aminobenzyl)-3,6,10,13,16,19-hexaazabicyclo[6.6.6]-eicosane-1,8-diamine) (SarAr) chelator to bombesin(7-14), radiolabel the conjugate with (64)Cu, and evaluate in vitro and in vivo. METHODS:SarAr was synthesized as previously published and conjugated to bombesin(7-14) by solid-phase peptide synthesis using standard Fmoc chemistry. Succinic acid (SA), 8-aminooctanoic acid (Aoc), and Gly-Ser-Gly (GSG) were used as linkers between SarAr and bombesin(7-14) to yield the resulting SarAr-SA-Aoc-bombesin(7-14) and SarAr-SA-Aoc-GSG-bombesin(7-14) peptides. The unlabeled peptides were evaluated in a competitive binding assay using PC-3prostate cancer cells and (125)I-Tyr(4)-bombesin to determine the inhibitory concentration of 50%. The peptides were radiolabeled with (64)Cu and evaluated for internalization into PC-3 cells in vitro and for in vivo tumor uptake in mice bearing PC-3 xenografts using biodistribution and small-animal PET/CT studies. RESULTS: The competitive binding assay demonstrated that both SarAr-SA-Aoc-bombesin(7-14) and SarAr-SA-Aoc-GSG-bombesin(7-14) bound with high affinity to GRPR with an inhibitory concentration of 50% of 3.5 and 4.5 nM, respectively. Both peptides were radiolabeled with (64)Cu at room temperature without further purification and demonstrated similar internalization into PC-3 cells. In vivo, the radiolabeled peptides demonstrated tumor-specific uptake (13.0 and 8.5 percentage injected dose per gram for (64)Cu-SarAr-SA-Aoc-bombesin(7-14) and (64)Cu-SarAr-SA-Aoc-GSG-bombesin(7-14), respectively, at 1 h) and imaging that was comparable to, or better than, that of the previously reported (64)Cu-labeled bombesin analogs. The (64)Cu-SarAr-SA-Aoc-GSG-bombesin(7-14) had more rapid blood clearance and lower tumor and normal-tissue uptake than (64)Cu-SarAr-SA-Aoc-bombesin(7-14), resulting in similar tumor-to-blood ratios for each analog (15.1 vs. 11.3 for (64)Cu-SarAr-SA-Aoc-bombesin(7-14) and (64)Cu-SarAr-SA-Aoc-GSG-bombesin(7-14), respectively, at 1 h). CONCLUSION: These studies demonstrate that (64)Cu-SarAr-SA-Aoc-bombesin(7-14) and (64)Cu-SarAr-SA-Aoc-GSG-bombesin(7-14) bound with high affinity to GRPR-expressing cells and that these peptides can be used for PET of GRPR-expressing prostate cancer.
Authors: Kuo-Shyan Lin; Andrew Luu; Kwamena E Baidoo; Hossein Hashemzadeh-Gargari; Ming-Kai Chen; Kenneth Brenneman; Roberto Pili; Martin Pomper; Michael A Carducci; Henry N Wagner Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2005 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: Christopher V Johnson; Tiffani Shelton; Charles J Smith; Lixin Ma; Michael C Perry; Wynn A Volkert; Timothy J Hoffman Journal: Cancer Biother Radiopharm Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 3.099
Authors: D W McCarthy; R E Shefer; R E Klinkowstein; L A Bass; W H Margeneau; C S Cutler; C J Anderson; M J Welch Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 1997-01 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Hancheng Cai; Zibo Li; Chiun-Wei Huang; Anthony H Shahinian; Hui Wang; Ryan Park; Peter S Conti Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2010-08-18 Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: Hanwen Zhang; Jianhua Chen; Christian Waldherr; Karin Hinni; Beatrice Waser; Jean Claude Reubi; Helmut R Maecke Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-09-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: C Andrew Boswell; Xiankai Sun; Weijun Niu; Gary R Weisman; Edward H Wong; Arnold L Rheingold; Carolyn J Anderson Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2004-03-11 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Jeffrey M Craft; Ravindra A De Silva; Kimberly A Lears; Rebecca Andrews; Kexian Liang; Samuel Achilefu; Buck E Rogers Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 2012-01-20 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Maggie S Cooper; Michelle T Ma; Kavitha Sunassee; Karen P Shaw; Jennifer D Williams; Rowena L Paul; Paul S Donnelly; Philip J Blower Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2012-04-13 Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: Christian Lohrmann; Hanwen Zhang; Daniel L J Thorek; Pooja Desai; Pat B Zanzonico; Joseph O'Donoghue; Christopher P Irwin; Thomas Reiner; Jan Grimm; Wolfgang A Weber Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2015-04-03 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Steven P Rowe; Alexander Drzezga; Bernd Neumaier; Markus Dietlein; Michael A Gorin; Michael R Zalutsky; Martin G Pomper Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Ying Li; Zhibo Liu; Curtis W Harwig; Maral Pourghiasian; Joseph Lau; Kuo-Shyan Lin; Paul Schaffer; Francois Benard; David M Perrin Journal: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2013-01-05