Literature DB >> 21321263

Shortened acquisition protocols for the quantitative assessment of the 2-tissue-compartment model using dynamic PET/CT 18F-FDG studies.

Ludwig G Strauss1, Leyun Pan, Caixia Cheng, Uwe Haberkorn, Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: (18)F-FDG kinetics are quantified by a 2-tissue-compartment model. The routine use of dynamic PET is limited because of this modality's 1-h acquisition time. We evaluated shortened acquisition protocols up to 0-30 min regarding the accuracy for data analysis with the 2-tissue-compartment model.
METHODS: Full dynamic series for 0-60 min were analyzed using a 2-tissue-compartment model. The time-activity curves and the resulting parameters for the model were stored in a database. Shortened acquisition data were generated from the database using the following time intervals: 0-10, 0-16, 0-20, 0-25, and 0-30 min. Furthermore, the impact of adding a 60-min uptake value to the dynamic series was evaluated. The datasets were analyzed using dedicated software to predict the results of the full dynamic series. The software is based on a modified support vector machines (SVM) algorithm and predicts the compartment parameters of the full dynamic series.
RESULTS: The SVM-based software provides user-independent results and was accurate at predicting the compartment parameters of the full dynamic series. If a squared correlation coefficient of 0.8 (corresponding to 80% explained variance of the data) was used as a limit, a shortened acquisition of 0-16 min was accurate at predicting the 60-min 2-tissue-compartment parameters. If a limit of 0.9 (90% explained variance) was used, a dynamic series of at least 0-20 min together with the 60-min uptake values is required.
CONCLUSION: Shortened acquisition protocols can be used to predict the parameters of the 2-tissue-compartment model. Either a dynamic PET series of 0-16 min or a combination of a dynamic PET/CT series of 0-20 min and a 60-min uptake value is accurate for analysis with a 2-tissue-compartment model.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21321263     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.110.079798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  13 in total

Review 1.  Importance of quantification for the analysis of PET data in oncology: review of current methods and trends for the future.

Authors:  Giampaolo Tomasi; Federico Turkheimer; Eric Aboagye
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  (18)F-Deoxyglucose (FDG) kinetics evaluated by a non-compartment model based on a linear regression function using a computer based simulation: correlation with the parameters of the two-tissue compartment model.

Authors:  Ludwig G Strauss; Leyun Pan; Caixia Cheng; Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-10-15

3.  Dynamic PET with (18)F-Deoxyglucose (FDG) and quantitative assessment with a two-tissue compartment model reflect the activity of glucose transporters and hexokinases in patients with colorectal tumors.

Authors:  Ludwig G Strauss; Dirk Koczan; Sven Klippel; Leyun Pan; Stefan Willis; Christos Sachpekidis; Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-09-19

4.  Theoretical Analysis of Penalized Maximum-Likelihood Patlak Parametric Image Reconstruction in Dynamic PET for Lesion Detection.

Authors:  Li Yang; Guobao Wang; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 5.  Total-Body PET Kinetic Modeling and Potential Opportunities Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Yiran Wang; Elizabeth Li; Simon R Cherry; Guobao Wang
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2021-08-03

6.  Abbreviated scan protocols to capture 18F-FDG kinetics for long axial FOV PET scanners.

Authors:  Varsha Viswanath; Hasan Sari; Austin R Pantel; Maurizio Conti; Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Clemens Mingels; Ian Alberts; Lars Eriksson; Kuangyu Shi; Axel Rominger; Joel S Karp
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 7.  PET-specific parameters and radiotracers in theoretical tumour modelling.

Authors:  Matthew Jennings; Loredana G Marcu; Eva Bezak
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 8.  Quantitative approaches of dynamic FDG-PET and PET/CT studies (dPET/CT) for the evaluation of oncological patients.

Authors:  Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss; Leyun Pan; Ludwig G Strauss
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.909

9.  The Potential Benefit by Application of Kinetic Analysis of PET in the Clinical Oncology.

Authors:  Mustafa Takesh
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2012-12-26

Review 10.  Hypoxia in head and neck cancer in theory and practice: a PET-based imaging approach.

Authors:  Loredana G Marcu; Wendy M Harriss-Phillips; Sanda M Filip
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 2.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.