Literature DB >> 21321032

Increasing VLBW deliveries at subspecialty perinatal centers via perinatal outreach.

Stephanie Binder1, Kathryn Hill, Jareen Meinzen-Derr, James M Greenberg, Vivek Narendran.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that the promotion of national guidelines recommending the transfer of high-risk mothers to subspecialty perinatal centers reduces mortality and morbidity through the reduction of preterm infants delivered at nontertiary maternity hospitals.
METHODS: After implementation of hospital-based educational and communication programs emphasizing the importance of maternal transfer to subspecialty perinatal centers, we conducted a population-based cohort study of all live births delivered at maternity hospitals in greater Cincinnati from 2003 through 2007 (n = 1825). Birth weights measured between 500 and 1499 g and gestational ages were less than 32 weeks. Risk-adjusted outcomes were measured by multivariate logistic regression in 2 stages. We compared these findings with those from a similar study conducted at our institution that included infants with birth weights less than 1500 g born between September 1, 1995, and December 31, 1997 (n = 848). The primary outcome was the percentage decrease in infants born with very low birth weights at nontertiary centers compared with our previous study.
RESULTS: The number of infants born with birth weights less than 1500 g and at less than 32 weeks' gestation delivered at hospitals without tertiary perinatal and neonatal care decreased from 25% to 11.8% between the 2 study periods. The odds of death or major morbidity for infants born with very low birth weights at nontertiary perinatal centers is 3 times that of infants born at subspecialty perinatal centers after controlling for demographic variations (odds ratio: 3.05 [95% confidence interval: 2.1-4.4]).
CONCLUSIONS: Local promotion of national guidelines by neonatologists coincided with a significant reduction in the percentage of infants born with birth weights less than 1500 g and at less than 32 weeks' gestation who were not delivered at subspecialty perinatal centers, and, at 88.2%, this nearly achieves the Healthy People 2010 objective to deliver 90% of infants born with very low birth weights in subspecialty perinatal centers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21321032      PMCID: PMC4172030          DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-1064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  13 in total

1.  Improved outcome of preterm infants when delivered in tertiary care centers.

Authors:  L Y Chien; R Whyte; K Aziz; P Thiessen; D Matthew; S K Lee
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  The relation between the availability of neonatal intensive care and neonatal mortality.

Authors:  David C Goodman; Elliott S Fisher; George A Little; Thérèse A Stukel; Chiang-hua Chang; Kenneth S Schoendorf
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-05-16       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The effect of birth hospital type on the outcome of very low birth weight infants.

Authors:  Barbara Warner; M Judith Musial; Thomas Chenier; Edward Donovan
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Hospital volume and neonatal mortality among very low birth weight infants.

Authors:  Dorothee B Bartels; David Wypij; Paul Wenzlaff; Olaf Dammann; Christian F Poets
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Effect of inborn versus outborn delivery on clinical outcomes in ventilated preterm neonates: secondary results from the NEOPAIN trial.

Authors:  Kristine G Palmer; Shari S Kronsberg; Bruce A Barton; Charlotte A Hobbs; Richard W Hall; K J S Anand
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.521

6.  [Regionalization of perinatal care in the Seine-Saint-Denis department of France].

Authors:  E Papiernik; M Bucourt; J Zeitlin; P Senanedj; B Topuz
Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)       Date:  2001-06

7.  Pregnant mothers out of the perinatal regionalization's reach.

Authors:  M A Attar; K Hanrahan; S W Lang; M R Gates; S L Bratton
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.521

8.  Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 gm.

Authors:  L A Papile; J Burstein; R Burstein; H Koffler
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 4.406

9.  The effect of transport on the rate of severe intraventricular hemorrhage in very low birth weight infants.

Authors:  C V Towers; R Bonebrake; G Padilla; P Rumney
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Evaluation of universal antenatal screening for group B streptococcus.

Authors:  Melissa K Van Dyke; Christina R Phares; Ruth Lynfield; Ann R Thomas; Kathryn E Arnold; Allen S Craig; Janet Mohle-Boetani; Ken Gershman; William Schaffner; Susan Petit; Shelley M Zansky; Craig A Morin; Nancy L Spina; Kathryn Wymore; Lee H Harrison; Kathleen A Shutt; Joseph Bareta; Sandra N Bulens; Elizabeth R Zell; Anne Schuchat; Stephanie J Schrag
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Trends in centralization of very preterm deliveries and neonatal survival in Finland in 1987-2017.

Authors:  Kjell Helenius; Mika Gissler; Liisa Lehtonen
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2019-07

Review 2.  Neonatal transport metrics and quality improvement in a regional transport service.

Authors:  Kyong-Soon Lee
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2019-07

Review 3.  Resuscitation of extremely preterm infants - controversies and current evidence.

Authors:  Pooja N Patel; Jayanta Banerjee; Sunit V Godambe
Journal:  World J Clin Pediatr       Date:  2016-05-08

Review 4.  Regionalization of neonatal care: benefits, barriers, and beyond.

Authors:  Sara C Handley; Scott A Lorch
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Neonatal outcomes of very preterm infants from a neonatal intensive care center.

Authors:  Wei-Qin Zhou; Ya-Bo Mei; Xiao-Ying Zhang; Qiu-Ping Li; Xiang-Yong Kong; Zhi-Chun Feng
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 2.764

Review 6.  Perinatal management: What has been learned through the network?

Authors:  Sanjay Chawla; Elizabeth E Foglia; Vishal Kapadia; Myra H Wyckoff
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.300

7.  Impact of managed clinical networks on NHS specialist neonatal services in England: population based study.

Authors:  C Gale; S Santhakumaran; S Nagarajan; Y Statnikov; N Modi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-04-03

8.  Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Extremely Preterm Infants in Japan According to Outborn/Inborn Birth Status.

Authors:  Yoshihito Sasaki; Kaoru Ishikawa; Akira Yokoi; Tomoaki Ikeda; Kazuo Sengoku; Satoshi Kusuda; Masanori Fujimura
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.624

9.  Association of early postnatal transfer and birth outside a tertiary hospital with mortality and severe brain injury in extremely preterm infants: observational cohort study with propensity score matching.

Authors:  Kjell Helenius; Nicholas Longford; Liisa Lehtonen; Neena Modi; Chris Gale
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-10-16

10.  The effects of designation and volume of neonatal care on mortality and morbidity outcomes of very preterm infants in England: retrospective population-based cohort study.

Authors:  S I Watson; W Arulampalam; S Petrou; N Marlow; A S Morgan; E S Draper; S Santhakumaran; N Modi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.