| Literature DB >> 21320349 |
Sze Man Wong1, Po Yee Chiu, Hoi Yan Leung, Limin Zhou, Zhong Zuo, Philip Y Lam, Kam Ming Ko.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Danshen-Gegen decoction (DG), a Chinese herbal formula, has been demonstrated to be effective for the treatment of coronary heart disease such as myocardial infarction. In the present study, we investigated the effect of DG post-conditioning on isoproterenol (ISO)-induced myocardial injury in rats.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21320349 PMCID: PMC3055215 DOI: 10.1186/1749-8546-6-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chin Med ISSN: 1749-8546 Impact factor: 5.455
Basal values of plasma enzyme activities and myocardial mitochondrial antioxidant parameters in rats
| LDH | AST | CPK | GSH | GR | GPX | ICDH | MDA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U/L | nmol/mg protein | mU/mg protein | pmol/mg protein | |||||
| Mean (SD) | 129.8 (10.8) | 31.2 (2.68) | 158.1 (20.4) | 4.3 (0.25) | 2.4 (0.24) | 2.8 (0.26) | 308.8 (23.0) | 90.5 (5.39) |
Plasma lactate dedydrogenase (LDH), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and creatine phosphokinase (CPK) activities, as well as myocardial mitochondrial reduced glutathione (GSH) level and glutathione reductase (GR), Se-glutathione peroxidase (GPX), and isocitrate dehydrogenase (ICDH) activities, and malodialdehyde (MDA) level were measured in rats immediately after an intraperitoneal injection of saline.
Figure 1Effects of DG-post-treatment on plasma enzyme activities in ISO-challenged rats. Animals were administered intraperitoneally with isoproterenol (ISO) at a dose of 200 mg/kg. Control animals received an injection of saline. DG extract was administered per oral at a dose of 4 g/kg immediately after the ISO challenge. Animals were sacrificed at increasing time intervals (2, 4, 6 hours) after ISO challenge. (A) Plasma lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), asparate aminotransferases (AST) and creatine phosphokinase (CPK) activities were measured. (B) The degree of protection against ISO-induced increases in plasma enzyme activities in DG-treated animals was estimated as described in Methods. Values are means ± SD (n = 6). * Significantly different from animals receiving saline injection without ISO; # significantly different from the time-matched ISO-challenged animals without DG post-treatment
Figure 2Effects of DG post-treatment on mitochondrial glutathione status and lipid peroxidation in ISO-challenged rat hearts. (A) Mitochondrial reduced glutathione (GSH) level, glutathione reductase (GR), Se-glutathione peroxidase (GPX) and isocitrate dehydrogenase (ICDH) activities as well as malondialdehyde (MDA) level were measured. (B) The degree of protection against ISO-induced changes in mitochondrial parameters was estimated as described in Methods. Values are means ± SD (n = 6). * Significantly different from animals receiving saline injection without ISO; # significantly different from the time-matched ISO-challenged animals without DG post-treatment
Figure 3Effects of DG post-treatment on mitochondrial Ca. Animals were sacrificed at four hours after ISO challenge. Myocardial mitochondrial Ca2+ content and cytochrome c release were measured. The lowest panel shows the representative immuno-stained band of cytochrome c of myocardial cytosolic fractions prepared from various experimental groups. The non-striped bar represents the non-ISO challenged group and the striped bar represents the ISO-challenged group. Values are means ± SD (n = 6). * Significantly different from the non-ISO-challenged animals without DG treatment (ie CON); † significantly different from the ISO-challenged CON
Figure 4Effects PKCε and mK. Animals were sacrificed at four hours after ISO challenge. PKCε translocation inhibitor and mKATP blocker (5-hydroxydecanoate, 5-HD) were intraperitoneally administered at a dose of 400 μg/kg one hour prior to the administration of the DG extract. Plasma enzyme activities and myocardial mitochondrial antioxidant parameters were measured as described in Figures 1 and 2. The non-striped bar represents the non-ISO-challenged group and the striped bar represents the ISO-challenged group. Values are means ± SD (n = 6). * Significantly different from the non-ISO-challenged CON; # significantly different from the ISO-challenged CON with inhibitors; † significantly different from the respective ISO-challenged CON