BACKGROUND: Circulating endothelial cells (CECs) have been detected at increased numbers in patients with solid cancers. CECs have not been systematically evaluated in patients with osteosarcoma. PROCEDURE: Patients 12 months to 30 years of age with newly diagnosed high-grade osteosarcoma were eligible for this prospective cohort study. Patients provided a single blood sample at study entry for CEC quantification by flow cytometry at a single reference laboratory. CECs were defined as CD146+, CD31+, CD45-, and CD133-. CEC progenitor cells (CEPs) were defined as CD146+, CD31+, CD45-, and CD133+. RESULTS: Eighteen patients enrolled (11 males; median age 16 years; range 5-21 years). CEC counts did not differ between patients with osteosarcoma compared to seven pediatric healthy controls (median 645 cells/ml, range 60-5,320 cells/ml vs. 1,670 cells/ml, range 330-4,700 cells/ml, respectively; P = 0.12). CEP counts did not differ between patients compared to controls (median 126 cells/ml, range 0-5,320 cells/ml vs. median 260 cells/ml, range 0-10,670 cells/ml, respectively; P = 0.69). CEC and CEP counts did not correlate with metastatic status, tumor size, or histologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: CEC and CEP levels are not increased in patients with osteosarcoma compared to healthy controls. CECs and CEPs do not correlate with clinical features of osteosarcoma. Alternative novel markers of disease burden and response are needed in this disease.
BACKGROUND: Circulating endothelial cells (CECs) have been detected at increased numbers in patients with solid cancers. CECs have not been systematically evaluated in patients with osteosarcoma. PROCEDURE: Patients 12 months to 30 years of age with newly diagnosed high-grade osteosarcoma were eligible for this prospective cohort study. Patients provided a single blood sample at study entry for CEC quantification by flow cytometry at a single reference laboratory. CECs were defined as CD146+, CD31+, CD45-, and CD133-. CEC progenitor cells (CEPs) were defined as CD146+, CD31+, CD45-, and CD133+. RESULTS: Eighteen patients enrolled (11 males; median age 16 years; range 5-21 years). CEC counts did not differ between patients with osteosarcoma compared to seven pediatric healthy controls (median 645 cells/ml, range 60-5,320 cells/ml vs. 1,670 cells/ml, range 330-4,700 cells/ml, respectively; P = 0.12). CEP counts did not differ between patients compared to controls (median 126 cells/ml, range 0-5,320 cells/ml vs. median 260 cells/ml, range 0-10,670 cells/ml, respectively; P = 0.69). CEC and CEP counts did not correlate with metastatic status, tumor size, or histologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: CEC and CEP levels are not increased in patients with osteosarcoma compared to healthy controls. CECs and CEPs do not correlate with clinical features of osteosarcoma. Alternative novel markers of disease burden and response are needed in this disease.
Authors: M Peichev; A J Naiyer; D Pereira; Z Zhu; W J Lane; M Williams; M C Oz; D J Hicklin; L Witte; M A Moore; S Rafii Journal: Blood Date: 2000-02-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Y H Lee; T Tokunaga; Y Oshika; R Suto; K Yanagisawa; M Tomisawa; H Fukuda; H Nakano; S Abe; A Tateishi; H Kijima; H Yamazaki; N Tamaoki; Y Ueyama; M Nakamura Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: J Tomlinson; S H Barsky; S Nelson; S Singer; B Pezeshki; M C Lee; F Eilber; M Nguyen Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: J Rak; Y Mitsuhashi; C Sheehan; A Tamir; A Viloria-Petit; J Filmus; S J Mansour; N G Ahn; R S Kerbel Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2000-01-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: M Kaya; T Wada; T Akatsuka; S Kawaguchi; S Nagoya; M Shindoh; F Higashino; F Mezawa; F Okada; S Ishii Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: M Kaya; T Wada; S Kawaguchi; S Nagoya; T Yamashita; Y Abe; H Hiraga; K Isu; M Shindoh; F Higashino; F Okada; M Tada; S Yamawaki; S Ishii Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2002-03-18 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Kamnesh R Pradhan; Julie A Mund; Heather L Claussen; Yasmin C Gosiengfiao; Vlad C Radulescu; Jennifer J Ballard; Ziyue Liu; Terry A Vik; Jamie Case Journal: J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 1.289
Authors: Thorsten Fuereder; Volker Wacheck; Sabine Strommer; Peter Horak; Marion Gerschpacher; Wolfgang Lamm; Danijel Kivaranovic; Michael Krainer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-04-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Thomas Ziebart; Sebastian Blatt; Christian Günther; Nadine Völxen; Andreas Pabst; Keyvan Sagheb; Sebastian Kühl; Thomas Lambrecht Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2016-03-19 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: David S Shulman; Kelly Klega; Alma Imamovic-Tuco; Andrea Clapp; Anwesha Nag; Aaron R Thorner; Eliezer Van Allen; Gavin Ha; Stephen L Lessnick; Richard Gorlick; Katherine A Janeway; Patrick J Leavey; Leo Mascarenhas; Wendy B London; Kieuhoa T Vo; Kimberly Stegmaier; David Hall; Mark D Krailo; Donald A Barkauskas; Steven G DuBois; Brian D Crompton Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2018-08-21 Impact factor: 7.640