Literature DB >> 21319143

Prospective evaluation of spinal reirradiation by using stereotactic body radiation therapy: The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center experience.

Amit K Garg1, Xin-Shelley Wang, Almon S Shiu, Pamela Allen, James Yang, Mary Frances McAleer, Syed Azeem, Laurence D Rhines, Eric L Chang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiotherapy for previously irradiated, progressive spinal metastases may be a viable option in selected patients. The authors review a prospective series of spinal metastasis patients reirradiated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.
METHODS: A total of 59 patients with 63 tumors of the spine were reirradiated with stereotactic body radiotherapy between 2003 and 2009. Spinal magnetic resonance imaging was performed both before treatment initiation and at regular follow-up intervals. Stereotactic body radiotherapy was delivered to a peripheral dose of 30 grays (Gy) in 5 fractions (6 Gy per fraction), or 27 Gy in 3 fractions (9 Gy per fraction). The National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria 2.0 and McCormick neurological function system were used to evaluate toxicity and neurologic status, respectively.
RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 17.6 months. Actuarial 1-year radiographic local control and overall survival for all patients were both 76%. Of the tumors that progressed after stereotactic body radiotherapy, 13 (81%) of 16 patients had tumors that were within 5 mm of the spinal cord, and 6 of them eventually developed spinal cord compression. Toxicity was most commonly grade 1 or 2 fatigue. Two patients experienced mild to moderate radiation injury (lumbar plexopathy) while remaining independently ambulatory and pain free. Freedom from neurologic deterioration from any cause was 92% at 1 year.
CONCLUSIONS: Reirradiation for progressive spinal metastases with stereotactic body radiotherapy results in good local control and limited toxicity. Initial surgery should be considered for tumors within 5 mm of the spinal cord. Radiation dose should be tailored for tumors near or invading the psoas muscle secondary to observed risk of lumbar plexopathy.
Copyright © 2011 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21319143     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  47 in total

1.  Stereotactic body radiation therapy for management of spinal metastases in patients without spinal cord compression: a phase 1-2 trial.

Authors:  Xin Shelley Wang; Laurence D Rhines; Almon S Shiu; James N Yang; Ugur Selek; Ibrahima Gning; Ping Liu; Pamela K Allen; Syed S Azeem; Paul D Brown; Hadley J Sharp; David C Weksberg; Charles S Cleeland; Eric L Chang
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  A comparison of stereotactic body radiation therapy for metastases to the sacral spine and treatment of the thoracolumbar spine.

Authors:  Roman O Kowalchuk; Michael R Waters; K Martin Richardson; Kelly Spencer; James M Larner; Jason P Sheehan; William H McAllister; Charles R Kersh
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2020

3.  Modern approaches to the management of metastatic epidural spinal cord compression.

Authors:  Zain A Husain; Arjun Sahgal; Eric L Chang; Pejman Jabehdar Maralani; Charlotte D Kubicky; Kristin J Redmond; Charles Fisher; Ilya Laufer; Simon S Lo
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2017-07-18

4.  [Advantages of stereotactic body radiation vs. conventional radiation for spinal metastases].

Authors:  D Rades
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  [Value of postoperative stereotaxic body radiation therapy for spinal metastases].

Authors:  Dirk Rades
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  In regards to decision making for reirradiation of a recurrent intramedullary spinal cord metastasis.

Authors:  Charles E Rutter; James B Yu; David J Carlson; Zain A Husain; Sherry Zhao; James Picone; Ranjit S Bindra
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2014

7.  Population description and clinical response assessment for spinal metastases: part 2 of the SPIne response assessment in Neuro-Oncology (SPINO) group report.

Authors:  Ilya Laufer; Simon S Lo; Eric L Chang; Jason Sheehan; Matthias Guckenberger; Moon-Jun Sohn; Samuel Ryu; Matthew Foote; Alexander Muacevic; Scott G Soltys; Samuel Chao; Sten Myrehaug; Peter C Gerszten; Eric Lis; Pejman Maralani; Mark Bilsky; Charles Fisher; Laurence Rhines; Jorrit-Jan Verlaan; David Schiff; Michael G Fehlings; Lijun Ma; Susan Chang; Wendy R Parulekar; Michael A Vogelbaum; Arjun Sahgal
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 12.300

8.  The era of stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases and the multidisciplinary management of complex cases.

Authors:  Rachit Kumar; Anick Nater; Ahmed Hashmi; Sten Myrehaug; Young Lee; Lijun Ma; Kristin Redmond; Simon S Lo; Eric L Chang; Albert Yee; Charles G Fisher; Michael G Fehlings; Arjun Sahgal
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2015-07-27

9.  Clinical outcome of vertebral compression fracture after single fraction spine radiosurgery for spinal metastases.

Authors:  Isabelle M Germano; Andrea Carai; Puneet Pawha; Seth Blacksburg; Yeh-Chi Lo; Sheryl Green
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 5.150

10.  Local disease control for spinal metastases following "separation surgery" and adjuvant hypofractionated or high-dose single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery: outcome analysis in 186 patients.

Authors:  Ilya Laufer; J Bryan Iorgulescu; Talia Chapman; Eric Lis; Weiji Shi; Zhigang Zhang; Brett W Cox; Yoshiya Yamada; Mark H Bilsky
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2013-01-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.