Literature DB >> 21318437

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe ARDS in pregnant and postpartum women during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic.

Priya Nair1, Andrew R Davies, John Beca, Rinaldo Bellomo, David Ellwood, Paul Forrest, Andrew Jackson, Roger Pye, Ian Seppelt, Elizabeth Sullivan, Steve Webb.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the technical challenges, efficacy, complications and maternal and infant outcomes associated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for severe adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in pregnant or postpartum patients during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic.
METHODS: Twelve critically ill pregnant and postpartum women were included in this retrospective observational study on the application of ECMO for the treatment of severe ARDS refractory to standard treatment. The study was conducted at seven tertiary hospitals in Australia and New Zealand.
RESULTS: Of the 12 patients treated with ECMO, 7 (58%) were pregnant and 5 (42%) were postpartum. Their median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 29 (26-33) years, 6 (50%) were obese. Two patients were initially treated with veno-arterial (VA) ECMO. All others received veno-venous (VV) ECMO with one or two drainage cannulae. ECMO circuit-related complications were rare, circuit change was needed in only two cases and there was no sudden circuit failure. On the other hand, bleeding was common, leading to relatively large volumes of packed red blood cell transfusion (median [IQR] volume transfused was 3,499 [1,451-4,874] ml) and was the main cause of death (three cases). Eight (66%) patients survived to discharge and seven were ambulant, with normal oxygen saturations. The survival rate of infants whose mothers received ECMO was 71% and surviving infants were discharged home with no sequelae.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of ECMO for severe ARDS in pregnant and postpartum women was associated with a 66% survival rate. The most common cause of death was bleeding. Infants delivered of mothers who had received ECMO had a 71% survival rate and, like their mothers, had no permanent sequelae at hospital discharge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21318437      PMCID: PMC7095332          DOI: 10.1007/s00134-011-2138-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


Introduction

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a method for supporting patients with severe adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) refractory to mechanical ventilation [1-3]. ECMO has been used in neonates and children with satisfactory outcomes [4, 5]. More recently, technical advances have enabled its safer application in adults [3, 6]. Among such adults, occasional patients have been supported with ECMO while pregnant or in the postpartum period. Such treatments have led to individual case reports only [7-15]. This lack of information makes it difficult to assess the safety and efficacy of this procedure in pregnant women and to estimate how it might affect maternal and/or infant outcome. In the winter of 2009, 760 patients were admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) in Australia and New Zealand with the pandemic swine-origin (H1N1) influenza [16]. ECMO was used in 68 adult patients who had either H1N1 influenza or strongly suspected H1N1 influenza [17]. Of these, 10 were pregnant or postpartum, which were described as part of the published cohort [17]. Two patients presented immediately subsequent and were added to aggregate to a series of 12, thereby providing the largest source of information to date on the safety and efficacy of ECMO during pregnancy. Accordingly, we now report on the various technical aspects and challenges of ECMO therapy in this cohort of pregnant and postpartum women with severe respiratory failure and describe maternal and infant outcomes.

Methods

Study design

Data collection was approved by the relevant human research ethics committees. We collected information on all pregnant and postpartum women (within 28 days of delivery) treated with ECMO for confirmed or strongly suspected 2009 H1N1 influenza-associated respiratory failure during the 2009 winter period (June 1st through September 30th) in the ICUs that provided ECMO support in Australia and New Zealand. Women who were postpartum at the time of ECMO commencement, but pregnant at the onset of influenza were included as they still had the anatomical, physiological and immunological alterations associated with pregnancy.

Data collection

Please see the electronic supplementary material (ESM) for details of data collection and statistical analysis.

Results

Patient characteristics at the time of ECMO commencement

Of the 12 patients treated with ECMO, 7 (58%) were pregnant and 5 (42%) were postpartum. The median (IQR) age was 29 (26–33) years. The associated comorbidities are summarized in Table 1. A diagnosis of H1N1 infection was confirmed in 10 (83%) patients, 1 had positive serology for influenza A and 1 had clinical features highly suggestive of influenza during a pandemic. Details regarding the severity of ARDS and the ECMO technical characteristics are described in the ESM and Table 1.
Table 1

Patient characteristics prior to initiation of ECMO therapy

Patient numberGestation/postpartumAge (years)ComorbiditiesDuration of MV prior to ECMO (days)SpO2 (%)PaO2/FiO2 ratioPaCO2 (mmHg)Max PEEP (cm)Rescue therapiesOther organ support
126 weeks34Obesity<155276820RM
213 weeks22Asthma1088659914PGI2
RM
321 weeks23

Asthma

Obesity

184515013iNOVasoactive
RM
423 weeks33Obesity182316220PGI2 Vasoactive
RM
520 weeks421693715015Prone
iNO, RM
626 weeks39Asthma<1N/A425420iNOCRRT vasoactive
RM
730 weeks2910907210215ProneVasoactive
8Postpartum27Obesity881536020ProneCRRT vasoactive
iNO, RM
9Postpartum29292493818ProneVasoactive
iNO, RM
10Postpartum23Diabetes983503015RM
11Postpartum27Obesity591336027RM
12Postpartum32

Obesity

Corrected TOF

192568924iNOCRRT vasoactive
RM

Gestation was documented at time of ICU admission

BMI body mass index, iNO inhaled nitric oxide, RM recruitment manouevres, MV mechanical ventilation, PGI nebulised prostacyclin, TOF tetralogy of Fallot, PaCO partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood, PEEP positive end-expiratory pressure, CRRT continuous renal replacement therapy, vasoactive vasoactive drug infusions, N/A not available

Patient characteristics prior to initiation of ECMO therapy Asthma Obesity Obesity Corrected TOF Gestation was documented at time of ICU admission BMI body mass index, iNO inhaled nitric oxide, RM recruitment manouevres, MV mechanical ventilation, PGI nebulised prostacyclin, TOF tetralogy of Fallot, PaCO partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood, PEEP positive end-expiratory pressure, CRRT continuous renal replacement therapy, vasoactive vasoactive drug infusions, N/A not available

Details of ICU support

The median (IQR) duration of mechanical ventilation was 25 (18–32) days. Seven (58%) patients required a tracheostomy to facilitate weaning from ventilation. All 12 patients received packed red blood cell transfusion during ECMO therapy. The median (IQR) volume of blood transfused per patient during ECMO therapy was 3,499 (1,451–4,874) ml. Five patients required platelet transfusions, 3 of who also required fresh frozen plasma. All patients received vasoactive drug infusions at some time during ECMO therapy. The median (IQR) duration of ECMO support was 14 (9–19) days. The length of ICU stay and hospital stay is reported in Table 3.
Table 3

Maternal and infant outcomes

Patient no.Pregnant/postpartumECMO duration (days)MV duration (days)ICU LOS (days)Hospital LOS (days)Maternal outcomeInfant outcome
1Pregnant18344043SurvivedSurvived
2Pregnant2172227SurvivedSurvived
3Pregnant11222842SurvivedSurvived
4Pregnant5161726SurvivedStillborn
5Pregnant207883112SurvivedStillborn
6Pregnant<1447DiedSurvived
7Pregnant20303333DiedSurvived
8Postpartum17252528DiedSurvived
9Postpartum10182024SurvivedSurvived
10Postpartum27363543DiedSurvived
11Postpartum15323853SurvivedSurvived
12Postpartum12314275SurvivedSurvived

LOS length of stay, MV mechanical ventilation

Technical details

Ten (83%) patients initially received VV ECMO and 2 (17%) received VA ECMO (Table 2). VA ECMO was the initial choice in the two patients due to the finding of moderate or severe left ventricular dysfunction on echocardiography. All patients had vascular cannulae inserted peripherally by a percutaneous Seldinger technique. Six (50%) patients received an additional venous drainage line (2 drainage lines and 1 return line) as blood flow rates through the circuit were deemed inadequate for effective therapy (Table 2).
Table 2

Technical details of ECMO support

Patient numberECMO configurationNo. of sitesSite and size of access cannula/eSite and size of return cannulaFlow at 4 h (L/min)Flow at 24 h (L/min)
1V-V

2 drainage

1 return

RIJ 19, LF 23RF 237.37.2
2V-V

1 drainage

1 return

RF 23LF 213.13.1
3V-V

1 drainage

1 return

RF 21RIJ 175.14
4V-V

1 drainage

1 return

RF 21LF 235.04.1
5V-V

1 drainage

1 return

RF 23RIJ 195.46.4
6V-V

1 drainage

1 return

RF 22LF 18N/AN/A
7V-V

2 drainage

1 return

LF 25, RF 23RIJ 193.94
8V-A to V-V

2 drainage

1 return

LF 25, RIJ 21RF 199.16.5
9V-V

1 drainage

1 return

RF 21RIJ 1832.9
10V-V

2 drainage

1 return

RF 23 RIJ 17LF 213.43.9
11V-V

2 drainage

1 return

RF 23, RIJ 17LF 214.95.2
12V-A to V-V

2 drainage

1 return

RF 25, RIJ 17LF 196.16

Cannula size in French

V-V venovenous, V-A veno-arterial, RF right femoral, LF left femoral, RIJ right internal jugular, N/A not available

Technical details of ECMO support 2 drainage 1 return 1 drainage 1 return 1 drainage 1 return 1 drainage 1 return 1 drainage 1 return 1 drainage 1 return 2 drainage 1 return 2 drainage 1 return 1 drainage 1 return 2 drainage 1 return 2 drainage 1 return 2 drainage 1 return Cannula size in French V-V venovenous, V-A veno-arterial, RF right femoral, LF left femoral, RIJ right internal jugular, N/A not available All circuits used a Quadrox D oxygenator (Maquet, Rastatt, Germany) and in 11 (92%) patients, a Jostra pump head (Maquet, Rastatt, Germany). All patients received therapeutic anticoagulation (Table 2). In 10 (83%) patients, a single circuit was utilized for the duration of the entire treatment, whereas two patients required a circuit change due to progressive failure of the initial circuit. Blood flow through the ECMO circuit at 4 and 24 h is reported in Table 2.

Outcomes

Eight (66%) patients were successfully weaned from ECMO, all of who survived to hospital discharge (Table 3). Of these, 7 (88%) were discharged home and 1 patient was discharged to a rehabilitation facility. All eight patients were ambulant at discharge with a median room air oxygen saturation of 95% (95–97). Six of the eight survivors were assessed for quality of life between 12 and 18 months after hospital discharge using the Short Form 36 (SF36v2®) tool. Their summary scores in both the physical health and mental health components were found to be similar to the Australian norms for an age- and sex-matched population. Two non-survivors were pregnant and two were postpartum. Of the four non-survivors, two died of bleeding (other than intracranial; one pulmonary and one from multiple sites), one died from intracranial haemorrhage and one of overwhelming fungal infection. Details of bleeding complications are included in Table 4.
Table 4

Anticoagulation and bleeding complications

Patient numberAnticoagulationAPTT meana (SD)Bleeding siteMaternal outcome
1Heparin76 (23)NilSurvived
2Heparin61 (22)NilSurvived
3Heparin112 (37)NilSurvived
4Heparin152 (66)UterineSurvived
5Heparin152 (59)PulmonarySurvived
6HeparinN/AMultipleDied
7Heparin70 (12)IntracranialDied
8Heparin69 (12)ECMO cannulaDied
9Heparin95 (66)NilSurvived
10Heparin54 (19)PulmonaryDied
11Heparin72 (14)ECMO cannulaSurvived
12Heparin76 (8)FasciotomySurvived

APPT activated partial thromboplastin time, SD standard deviation, N/A not available

aMean of highest daily APTT value (in seconds) achieved during ECMO therapy

Maternal and infant outcomes LOS length of stay, MV mechanical ventilation Anticoagulation and bleeding complications APPT activated partial thromboplastin time, SD standard deviation, N/A not available aMean of highest daily APTT value (in seconds) achieved during ECMO therapy Table 5 shows comparative outcomes between this cohort of patients and the non-pregnant cohort of 18 women of childbearing age (15–45 years) who received ECMO support during the same time period.
Table 5

Comparison of pregnant/postpartum patient cohort with other women of childbearing age (15–45 years) who received ECMO during the same time period

VariablePregnant/postpartum cohort (N = 12)Other women of childbearing age (N = 18)p Value
Median age (IQR) (years)28 (24–32)34 (27–37)0.62
Median duration of MV (IQR) (days)24 (17–32)22 (12–30)0.25
Median duration on ECMO (IQR) (days)12 (6–17)10 (7–13)0.32
Bleeding rate (%)67500.45
Infection rate (%)58670.71
Median ICU length of stay (IQR) (days)27 (21–37)21 (13–32)0.34
Median hospital length of stay (IQR) (days)35 (24–43)25 (15–33)0.51
Mortality (%)33281.0
Comparison of pregnant/postpartum patient cohort with other women of childbearing age (15–45 years) who received ECMO during the same time period

Complications

Eight (67%) patients suffered from bleeding complications (requiring transfusion) during ECMO support (Table 4). Seven (58%) patients acquired one or more nosocomial infection. Of the infections encountered, one was bloodstream, four were respiratory, one was urinary tract, one was line-related and five were wound infections. One maternal death was attributed to infection. Other significant complications noted were limb ischaemia in two cases in patients receiving VA ECMO (neither of which required amputation or embolectomy), and venous thromboembolism (1). No technical difficulties, such as accidental decannulation, disconnection, oxygenator failure, pump failure, haemolysis, air embolism or other circuit complications, were noted in this cohort of patients. There were no thrombotic complications.

Pregnancy and delivery details

Three patients (25%) were primigravida. The median (IQR) gestational age at the time of ICU admission for the seven pregnant patients was 24 (21–27) weeks. None of the pregnant patients were in the first trimester of pregnancy. Of the five postpartum patients, all received ECMO therapy within a week of delivery. Three of the pregnancies (38%) were complicated by pre-eclampsia and one patient had a placenta praevia. There were no multiple pregnancies. Three patients (25%) had a preterm operative delivery due to the severity of the maternal illness. Of the 12 patients, 5 delivered spontaneously, 2 had vacuum-assisted delivery and 5 had caesarean sections (3 patients after ECMO therapy was completed, 1 just after ECMO was commenced due to extreme severity of maternal illness and 1 prior to the commencement of ECMO therapy).

Details of infants born to mothers following ECMO therapy (n = 7)

Five of the 7 (71%) infants delivered after commencement of ECMO were live births (Table 3). Of the two stillborn infants, pregnancy was terminated due to the severity of maternal illness in one case and in the second, there was a spontaneous birth of a stillborn infant shortly after commencing ECMO treatment. The median gestational age at birth was 31 (25–36) weeks. The median birth weight was 1,570 (972–3,015) g. Two of the live-born infants had a low Apgar score (between 0 and 6) 5 min after birth. Four of 5 live-born infants were admitted to a special care unit for respiratory support. No congenital abnormalities were noted. All the live-born infants survived.

Discussion

Summary of principal findings

We studied the technical challenges, efficacy, complications and maternal and infant outcomes in a cohort of critically ill pregnant and postpartum patients with severe, hypoxic respiratory failure secondary to ARDS during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic who were treated with ECMO. We found that obesity (pre-pregnancy BMI >30) was common and that, despite significant right ventricular dysfunction in four patients, only two were initially treated with VA ECMO and that adequate gas exchange was achieved in all cases. Circuit-related complications were rare; circuit change was needed in only two cases and there was no sudden circuit failure. On the other hand, bleeding was common and responsible for the transfusion of large volumes of packed red blood cells and significantly contributed to three of the four deaths. Eight (66%) patients survived and seven were ambulant and discharged with normal oxygen saturations. The survival of normal infants delivered while the mother was on ECMO was 71%.

Comparison with previous studies

Publications regarding the use of ECMO in pregnancy have, so far, only been single case reports. Of the five patients described with respiratory failure [7-11], four survived and of the five infants, three survived. In the recent CESAR study [6], a multi-centre randomized control trial comparing transfer to an ECMO centre for ECMO therapy to conventional mechanical ventilation alone in severe ARDS (but not pregnant patients), the survival rate for ECMO therapy was 63% overall. The Australian and New Zealand observational study [17] of 68 adult patients treated with ECMO for severe respiratory failure during the winter of 2009 (of which some the patients reported in this study are a subset) reported an overall survival of 75% (95% CI 60–82%) [12].

Significance of study findings

Our study suggests that ECMO is an appropriate life supportive option in pregnant and postpartum patients with severe respiratory failure and extreme levels of hypoxia, and that when utilized in this setting, it can deliver acceptable maternal and infant outcomes. Such outcomes may be related to the very early use of ECMO, thereby limiting the duration of maternal hypoxia, hypercarbia and acidosis as well as limiting the duration of ventilator-associated lung injury. Bleeding was the most common complication of therapy and it was the major contributing factor in three deaths. This finding, the concurrent observations that no patient experienced thrombotic complications, that only two circuits required change and that none failed suddenly all indicate that these patients were likely relatively over-anticoagulated during ECMO. This may suggest the need for a conservative approach to anticoagulation during ECMO treatment in pregnant women. Also, of clinical relevance is the observation that the presence of right ventricular dysfunction does not necessarily require VA ECMO support and that once mechanical ventilation is minimized and the right heart decompressed, the systemic circulation remains stable.

Study strengths and limitations

Our study is a retrospective case series, with the associated inherent shortcomings, including the lack of randomization of treatment to ECMO or standard care. Patient selection for ECMO and subsequent management of these challenging cases was determined by clinicians based on experience, limited current literature and local guidelines. However, equipment, policies and practices remained relatively homogenous owing to integrated intensive care services and training in our two countries. Our study does not report on the long-term pulmonary function tests of the mothers or the long-term neurological sequelae in the infants. Consequently, these results may not be generalisable to pregnant and postpartum patients who receive ECMO for other conditions. To our knowledge, however, this is the largest published series of pregnant and/or postpartum patients treated with ECMO. It includes the complete experience from our two countries during the 2009 pandemic. The propensity of the H1N1 virus to cause severe respiratory failure in young adults with an increased risk in pregnant and postpartum women [18, 19] enabled us to study a number of patients with similar lung pathology over a relatively short time span. The findings of our study have relevance to the treatment of future patients who may present with severe 2009 H1N1 ARDS in subsequent outbreaks.

Conclusions

ECMO support for severe respiratory failure is technically feasible in pregnant and postpartum patients—femoral vascular cannulation and prolonged circuit life are possible and adequate oxygenation is achievable despite the recognised augmented cardiac output. ECMO is effective, with outcomes comparable to those of non-pregnant patients, and acceptable infant outcomes. Although ECMO was relatively safe, with complication rates similar to other groups, major bleeding contributed to significant morbidity and mortality suggesting that a low anticoagulation or anticoagulation-free approach in future patients may be prudent. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary material 1 (DOC 22 kb)
  18 in total

1.  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in pregnancy.

Authors:  P T King; A Rosalion; J McMillan; M Buist; P W Holmes
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Impact of ECMO on neonatal mortality in Michigan (1980-1999).

Authors:  Brendan T Campbell; Thomas M Braun; Robert E Schumacher; Robert H Bartlett; Ronald B Hirschl
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.545

3.  Prolonged extracorporeal life support (ECLS) for varicella pneumonia.

Authors:  W A Lee; S Kolla; R J Schreiner; R B Hirschl; R H Bartlett
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza ("swine flu") in Australian and New Zealand intensive care.

Authors:  Steven A R Webb; Ian M Seppelt
Journal:  Crit Care Resusc       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.159

5.  A potentially preventable case of serious influenza infection in a pregnant patient.

Authors:  Michael D Parkins; Kevin Fonseca; Adam D Peets; Kevin B Laupland; Khaled Shamseddin; M John Gill
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy for circulatory arrest due to postpartum hemorrhage.

Authors:  Lionel Reyftmann; Estelle Morau; Herve Dechaud; Dechaud Herve; Jean-Marc Frapier; Frapier Jean-Marc; Bernard Hedon; Hedon Bernard
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Extracorporeal life support for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome in adults.

Authors:  Mark R Hemmila; Stephen A Rowe; Tamer N Boules; Judiann Miskulin; John W McGillicuddy; Douglas J Schuerer; Jonathan W Haft; Fresca Swaniker; Saman Arbabi; Ronald B Hirschl; Robert H Bartlett
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for the treatment of neonatal respiratory failure.

Authors:  William A Carey; Christopher E Colby
Journal:  Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2009-08-26

9.  Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for 2009 Influenza A(H1N1) Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Authors:  Andrew Davies; Daryl Jones; Michael Bailey; John Beca; Rinaldo Bellomo; Nikki Blackwell; Paul Forrest; David Gattas; Emily Granger; Robert Herkes; Andrew Jackson; Shay McGuinness; Priya Nair; Vincent Pellegrino; Ville Pettilä; Brian Plunkett; Roger Pye; Paul Torzillo; Steve Webb; Michael Wilson; Marc Ziegenfuss
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Staphylococcal septicemia and adult respiratory distress syndrome in pregnancy treated with extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal.

Authors:  L R Greenberg; T R Moore
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  21 in total

1.  Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America: 2018 Update on Diagnosis, Treatment, Chemoprophylaxis, and Institutional Outbreak Management of Seasonal Influenzaa.

Authors:  Timothy M Uyeki; Henry H Bernstein; John S Bradley; Janet A Englund; Thomas M File; Alicia M Fry; Stefan Gravenstein; Frederick G Hayden; Scott A Harper; Jon Mark Hirshon; Michael G Ison; B Lynn Johnston; Shandra L Knight; Allison McGeer; Laura E Riley; Cameron R Wolfe; Paul E Alexander; Andrew T Pavia
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 2.  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the pre and post lung transplant period.

Authors:  Nirmal S Sharma; Mathew G Hartwig; Don Hayes
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-02

Review 3.  Asthma Outcomes and Management During Pregnancy.

Authors:  Catherine A Bonham; Karen C Patterson; Mary E Strek
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Interdisciplinary Peripartum Management of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - a Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  J Weyrich; R Bogdanski; J U Ortiz; B Kuschel; K T M Schneider; S M Lobmaier
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.915

5.  Pregnancy complicated by influenza A ARDS requiring consecutive VV-ECMO treatment with successful vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Peter Radsel; Vojka Gorjup; Anja Jazbec; Rihard Knafelj; Miha Lucovnik; Gorazd Kavsek; Lilijana Kornhauser Cerar; Marko Noc
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 1.731

6.  Thrombocytopenia and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults with acute respiratory failure: a cohort study.

Authors:  Darryl Abrams; Matthew R Baldwin; Matthew Champion; Cara Agerstrand; Andrew Eisenberger; Matthew Bacchetta; Daniel Brodie
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  Acute respiratory failure in pregnancy.

Authors:  Stephen E Lapinsky
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2015-06-10

8.  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the acute treatment of cardiovascular collapse immediately post-partum.

Authors:  W Robert Leeper; Matthew Valdis; Robert Arntfield; L Ray Guo
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-08-13

Review 9.  Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine 2011: III. ARDS and ECMO, weaning, mechanical ventilation, noninvasive ventilation, pediatrics and miscellanea.

Authors:  Massimo Antonelli; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; J Randall Curtis; Daniel De Backer; Goran Hedenstierna; Michael Joannidis; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Jean-Charles Preiser; Patricia Rocco; Jean-François Timsit; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  A curious case of acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Todd C Crawford; Joshua C Grimm; J Trent Magruder; R Scott Stephens; Christopher M Sciortino; A Jason Vaught; Janyne Althaus; Ashish S Shah; Bo S Kim
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2015-11-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.