| Literature DB >> 21318189 |
Karly C Sourris1, Brooke E Harcourt, Sally A Penfold, Felicia Y T Yap, Amy L Morley, Philip E Morgan, Michael J Davies, Scott T Baker, George Jerums, Josephine M Forbes.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) and their receptors are prominent contributors to diabetic kidney disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21318189 PMCID: PMC3034946 DOI: 10.1155/2010/974681
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Diabetes Res ISSN: 1687-5214
Metabolic and renal parameters in control and type 2 diabetic subjects. BMI: body mass index, SBP: systolic blood pressure, and DBP: diastolic blood pressure.
| Control | Diabetes | Diabetes + RI | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 5 | 15 | 7 |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.6 ± 0.4 | 8.1 ± 1.2* | 7.4 ± 0.8* |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 34.5 ± 4.9 | 39.9 ± 6.8 | 39.9 ± 6.6 |
| AER ( | 11.7 ± 5.9 (2.9–32.9) | 21.9 ± 21.7 (3.8–86.6) | 356.7 ± 667.7 (3.3–1998.0) |
| iGFR (mL/min/1.73 sqm) | 131.0 ± 28.4 | 114.2 ± 16.8 | 93.0 ± 38.6† |
| SBP (mmHg) | 135.0 ± 7.9 | 143.3 ± 14.8 | 132.1 ± 16.6 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 86.0 ± 8.9 | 86.7 ± 9.8 | 73.6 ± 14.4† |
| Circulating CML ( | 955.6 ± 129.7 | 916.2 ± 207.7 | 885.8 ± 119.3 |
*P < .05 versus control, † P < .05 versus diabetes, § P = .07 (ns) versus diabetes.
Renal and metabolic parameters in an experimental model of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes the dbdb mouse followed from weeks 10 to 20 of age. Dbh: non diabetic control mice, dbdb: diabetic mice.
|
| Plasma glucose (mmol/L) | Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | Circulating AGE ( | Creatinine clearance (ml/min/m2) | Albumin excretion rate ( | Kidney to body | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dbh Low AGE | 10 | 19.6 ± 4.9 | 1.5 ± 0.2 | 304.1 ± 106.8 | 17.2 ± 1.4 | 226.5 ± 34.6 | 1.13 ± 0.16 |
| dbh High AGE | 10 | 18.8 ± 5.3 | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 357.3 ± 88.2 | 24.2 ± 6.3§ | 151.0 ± 12.9 | 1.22 ± 0.13 |
| dbdb Low AGE | 10 | 38.0 ± 8.5$ | 1.5 ± 0.5 | 353.3 ± 136.1 | 20.1 ± 15.4 | 2608.0 ± 791.1$ | 1.62 ± 0.27$ |
| dbdb High AGE | 10 | 35.7 ± 6.3$ | 1.8 ± 0.5$ | 284.8 ± 69.1 | 13.4 ± 8.0#$ | 2334.3 ± 520.2$ | 1.63 ± 0.24$ |
§ P < .05 versus dbh Low AGE, # P < .05 versus dbdb Low AGE, $ P < .05 versus corresponding dbh group.
Figure 1Flow cytometric analysis for the cell surface expression of (a) RAGE, (b) AGE-R1 and intracellular levels of (c) AGE-R1 and (d) AGE-R3 on PBMCs in dbh and dbdb mice at week 20 of age. Empty bars: low AGE diet (LA) and filled bars: high AGE (HA) groups. *P < .05 versus corresponding low AGE group, § P < .05 versus dbh group within the same diet.
Figure 2Representative histograms of flow cytometric analysis of AGE receptors in PBMCs isolated from type 2 diabetic patients. Cell surface expression of (a) RAGE and (b) AGE-R1. Intracellular (c) AGE-R1 and (d) AGE-R3 within PBMCs. Receptor positive cells (M1 filled histogram) were identified as those which fluoresced above their relative secondary antibody (empty histogram).
Figure 3Flow cytometric analysis for the cell surface expression of (a) RAGE and (b) AGER-1 and intracellular levels of (c) AGE-R1 and (d) AGE-R3 on PBMCs of human control, diabetic (DM) and diabetic individuals with renal impairment (DM + RI). (e) Positive correlation between cell surface expression of AGE-R1 and Albumin Excretion Rate (AER), P = .0056. Empty bars: control, grey bars: diabetes, and black bars are diabetes with renal impairment (iGFR < 90) groups. nd: not detected. *P < .05 versus control, † P < .05 versus DM, P < .0001 versus control (n = 5–10/group).