Darren T Oystreck1, Elizabeth C Engle, Thomas M Bosley. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, and King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. darrenoystreck@ymail.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In 2002, the new term congenital cranial dysinnervation disorder (CCDD) was proposed as a substitute for the traditional concept of congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles (CFEOM) based on mounting genetic, neuropathologic, and imaging evidence, suggesting that many, if not all, of these disorders result from a primary neurologic maldevelopment rather than from a muscle abnormality. This report provides an update 8 years after that original report. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Review of pertinent articles published from January 2003 until June 2010 describing CCDD variants identified under PubMed MeSH terms congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles, congenital cranial dysinnervation disorders, individual phenotypes included under the term CCDD, and congenital ocular motility disorders. RESULTS: At present, a total of 7 disease genes and 10 phenotypes fall under the CCDD umbrella. A number of additional loci and phenotypes still await gene elucidation, with the anticipation that more syndromes and genes will be identified in the future. Identification of genes and their function, along with advances in neuroimaging, have expanded our understanding of the mechanisms underlying several anomalous eye movement patterns. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence still supports the concept that the CCDDs are primarily due to neurogenic disturbances of brainstem or cranial nerve development. Several CCDDs are now known to have nonophthalmologic associations involving neurologic, neuroanatomic, cerebrovascular, cardiovascular, and skeletal abnormalities.
BACKGROUND: In 2002, the new term congenital cranial dysinnervation disorder (CCDD) was proposed as a substitute for the traditional concept of congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles (CFEOM) based on mounting genetic, neuropathologic, and imaging evidence, suggesting that many, if not all, of these disorders result from a primary neurologic maldevelopment rather than from a muscle abnormality. This report provides an update 8 years after that original report. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Review of pertinent articles published from January 2003 until June 2010 describing CCDD variants identified under PubMed MeSH terms congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles, congenital cranial dysinnervation disorders, individual phenotypes included under the term CCDD, and congenital ocular motility disorders. RESULTS: At present, a total of 7 disease genes and 10 phenotypes fall under the CCDD umbrella. A number of additional loci and phenotypes still await gene elucidation, with the anticipation that more syndromes and genes will be identified in the future. Identification of genes and their function, along with advances in neuroimaging, have expanded our understanding of the mechanisms underlying several anomalous eye movement patterns. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence still supports the concept that the CCDDs are primarily due to neurogenic disturbances of brainstem or cranial nerve development. Several CCDDs are now known to have nonophthalmologic associations involving neurologic, neuroanatomic, cerebrovascular, cardiovascular, and skeletal abnormalities.
Authors: M Nakano; K Yamada; J Fain; E C Sener; C J Selleck; A H Awad; J Zwaan; P B Mullaney; T M Bosley; E C Engle Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Steve Holve; Barbara Friedman; H Eugene Hoyme; Theodore J Tarby; Sharon J Johnstone; Robert P Erickson; Carol L Clericuzio; Christopher Cunniff Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2003-07-15 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Raidah Al-Baradie; Koki Yamada; Cynthia St Hilaire; Wai-Man Chan; Caroline Andrews; Nathalie McIntosh; Motoi Nakano; E Jean Martonyi; William R Raymond; Sada Okumura; Michael M Okihiro; Elizabeth C Engle Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2002-10-22 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Jürgen Kohlhase; Marielle Heinrich; Lucia Schubert; Manuela Liebers; Andreas Kispert; Franco Laccone; Peter Turnpenny; Robin M Winter; William Reardon Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2002-11-01 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Max A Tischfield; Hagit N Baris; Chen Wu; Guenther Rudolph; Lionel Van Maldergem; Wei He; Wai-Man Chan; Caroline Andrews; Joseph L Demer; Richard L Robertson; David A Mackey; Jonathan B Ruddle; Thomas D Bird; Irene Gottlob; Christina Pieh; Elias I Traboulsi; Scott L Pomeroy; David G Hunter; Janet S Soul; Anna Newlin; Louise J Sabol; Edward J Doherty; Clara E de Uzcátegui; Nicolas de Uzcátegui; Mary Louise Z Collins; Emin C Sener; Bettina Wabbels; Heide Hellebrand; Thomas Meitinger; Teresa de Berardinis; Adriano Magli; Costantino Schiavi; Marco Pastore-Trossello; Feray Koc; Agnes M Wong; Alex V Levin; Michael T Geraghty; Maria Descartes; Maree Flaherty; Robyn V Jamieson; H U Møller; Ingo Meuthen; David F Callen; Janet Kerwin; Susan Lindsay; Alfons Meindl; Mohan L Gupta; David Pellman; Elizabeth C Engle Journal: Cell Date: 2010-01-08 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Bryn D Webb; Sherin Shaaban; Harald Gaspar; Luis F Cunha; Christian R Schubert; Ke Hao; Caroline D Robson; Wai-Man Chan; Caroline Andrews; Sarah MacKinnon; Darren T Oystreck; David G Hunter; Anthony J Iacovelli; Xiaoqian Ye; Anne Camminady; Elizabeth C Engle; Ethylin Wang Jabs Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2012-07-05 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Beverly A Karpinski; Corey A Bryan; Elizabeth M Paronett; Jennifer L Baker; Alejandra Fernandez; Anelia Horvath; Thomas M Maynard; Sally A Moody; Anthony-S LaMantia Journal: Dev Biol Date: 2016-03-15 Impact factor: 3.582
Authors: Noriko Miyake; Joseph L Demer; Sherin Shaaban; Caroline Andrews; Wai-Man Chan; Stephen P Christiansen; David G Hunter; Elizabeth C Engle Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-08-11 Impact factor: 4.799