Literature DB >> 21317657

Evaluating patient experience in online health communities: implications for health care organizations.

Priya Nambisan1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Online communities that focus on health-related matters have rapidly increased in number in the last several years or so. The increasing demand from health consumers for such forums have led several leading health care organizations (HCOs), including Kaiser Permanente and Johns Hopkins, to establish online communities/discussion forums as part of their patient-support services. Patients' interactions in such HCO-led online health communities potentially add another important dimension to the overall patient experience. However, there has been limited research focus on measuring or evaluating patients' experience in such online health communities. PURPOSES: The objective of this study was to evaluate patients' online community experience (OCE) and examine its impact on patients' attitude toward the HCO and its services.
METHOD: The data collection was conducted using an online questionnaire sent to consumers/patients who participated in the online health communities of three large academic medical centers: the Johns Hopkins Pathology discussion board, run by the pathology department at Johns Hopkins University; the MD Anderson Cancer survivor board, run by MD Anderson Cancer Center at the University of Texas; and the Joslin Discussion Board, run by Joslin Diabetes Center affiliated with Harvard Medical School. Confirmatory factor analysis was done to validate the four dimensions of OCE. Linear regression technique was used to validate the impact of OCE on patient attitudes.
FINDINGS: The results provide support for four dimensions of patients' OCE: pragmatic, empathic, sociability, and usability. Furthermore, all these four dimensions of OCE had a positive impact on patient's attitudes toward the HCO and its services. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: An understanding of the four dimensions of patient experience in online health communities and its implications on patient attitudes could help HCOs to design, deploy, and manage such online health communities more effectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21317657     DOI: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3182099f82

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev        ISSN: 0361-6274


  8 in total

1.  Engaging adolescents in a computer-based weight management program: avatars and virtual coaches could help.

Authors:  Cynthia LeRouge; Kathryn Dickhut; Christine Lisetti; Savitha Sangameswaran; Toree Malasanos
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Usability and acceptance evaluation of ACESO: a Web-based breast cancer survivorship tool.

Authors:  Akshat Kapoor; Priya Nambisan
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 3.  Molecular genetic testing and the future of clinical genomics.

Authors:  Sara Huston Katsanis; Nicholas Katsanis
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Analysis of patient organizations' needs and ICT use--The APTIC project in Spain to develop an online collaborative social network.

Authors:  Eulàlia Hernández-Encuentra; Beni Gómez-Zúñiga; Noemí Guillamón; Mercè Boixadós; Manuel Armayones
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 5.  Patients' perceived needs of osteoarthritis health information: A systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Louisa Chou; Lisa Ellis; Michelle Papandony; K L Maheeka D Seneviwickrama; Flavia M Cicuttini; Kaye Sullivan; Andrew J Teichtahl; Yuanyuan Wang; Andrew M Briggs; Anita E Wluka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Online public health preparedness training programs: an evaluation of user experience with the technological environment.

Authors:  Priya Nambisan
Journal:  Online J Public Health Inform       Date:  2010-12-23

7.  Measuring actual eHealth literacy among patients with rheumatic diseases: a qualitative analysis of problems encountered using Health 1.0 and Health 2.0 applications.

Authors:  Rosalie van der Vaart; Constance H C Drossaert; Miriam de Heus; Erik Taal; Mart A F J van de Laar
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Identifying barriers to patient acceptance of active surveillance: content analysis of online patient communications.

Authors:  Mark V Mishra; Michele Bennett; Armon Vincent; Olivia T Lee; Costas D Lallas; Edouard J Trabulsi; Leonard G Gomella; Adam P Dicker; Timothy N Showalter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.