Literature DB >> 21317316

Decisions for others are more creative than decisions for the self.

Evan Polman1, Kyle J Emich.   

Abstract

Four studies investigate whether decisions for others produce more creative solutions than do decisions for the self and if construal level explains this relation. In Study 1, participants carried out a structured imagination task by drawing an alien for a story that they would write, or alternatively for a story that someone else would write. As expected, drawing an alien for someone else produced a more creative alien. In Studies 2a and 2b, construal level (i.e., psychological distance) was independently manipulated. Participants generated more creative ideas on behalf of distant others than on behalf of either close others or themselves. Finally, in Study 3, a classic insight problem was investigated. Participants deciding for others were more likely to solve the problem; furthermore, this result was mediated by psychological distance. These findings demonstrate that people are more creative for others than for themselves and shed light on differences in self-other decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21317316     DOI: 10.1177/0146167211398362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0146-1672


  5 in total

1.  The Effect of Psychological Distance on Children's Reasoning about Future Preferences.

Authors:  Wendy S C Lee; Cristina M Atance
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Do our risk preferences change when we make decisions for others? A meta-analysis of self-other differences in decisions involving risk.

Authors:  Eleonore Batteux; Eamonn Ferguson; Richard J Tunney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Drawing what lies ahead: False intentions are more abstractly depicted than true intentions.

Authors:  Sofia Calderon; Erik Mac Giolla; Karl Ask; Pär Anders Granhag
Journal:  Appl Cogn Psychol       Date:  2018-06-13

4.  Fostering students' creative thinking skills by means of a one-year creativity training program.

Authors:  Simone M Ritter; Xiaojing Gu; Maurice Crijns; Peter Biekens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Now You Do It, Now You Don't: The Mixed Blessing of Creative Deviance as a Prosocial Behavior.

Authors:  Jigyashu Shukla; Ronit Kark
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-03-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.