OBJECTIVE: The maximal diameter of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and the change in diameter over time reflect rupture risk and are used for surgical planning. However, evidence has emerged that aneurysm volume may be a better indicator of AAA remodeling. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between the volume and maximal diameter of the abdominal aorta in patients with untreated infrarenal AAA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 100 patients with infrarenal AAA who were followed for more than 6 months. We examined 2 sets of computed tomography images for each patient, acquired ≥ 6 months apart. The maximal diameter and volume of the infrarenal abdominal aorta were determined by semiautomated segmentation software. RESULTS: At baseline, mean maximal infrarenal diameter was 5.1 ± 1.0 cm and mean aortic volume was 139 ± 72 mL. There was good correlation between the maximal diameter and aortic volume at baseline (r(2) = 0.55; P<0.001). The mean change in maximal diameter between studies was 0.2 ± 0.3 cm and the mean volume change was 19 ± 19 mL. However, the correlation between diameter change and volume change was modest (r(2) = 0.34; P=0.001). Most patients (n = 64) had no measurable change in maximal diameter between studies (≤ 2 mm), but the change in volume was found to vary widely (-2 to 69 mL). CONCLUSION: In patients with untreated infrarenal AAA, a change in aortic volume can occur in the absence of a significant change in maximal diameter. Additional work is needed to examine the relationship between change in AAA volume and outcomes in this patient group.
OBJECTIVE: The maximal diameter of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and the change in diameter over time reflect rupture risk and are used for surgical planning. However, evidence has emerged that aneurysm volume may be a better indicator of AAA remodeling. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between the volume and maximal diameter of the abdominal aorta in patients with untreated infrarenal AAA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 100 patients with infrarenal AAA who were followed for more than 6 months. We examined 2 sets of computed tomography images for each patient, acquired ≥ 6 months apart. The maximal diameter and volume of the infrarenal abdominal aorta were determined by semiautomated segmentation software. RESULTS: At baseline, mean maximal infrarenal diameter was 5.1 ± 1.0 cm and mean aortic volume was 139 ± 72 mL. There was good correlation between the maximal diameter and aortic volume at baseline (r(2) = 0.55; P<0.001). The mean change in maximal diameter between studies was 0.2 ± 0.3 cm and the mean volume change was 19 ± 19 mL. However, the correlation between diameter change and volume change was modest (r(2) = 0.34; P=0.001). Most patients (n = 64) had no measurable change in maximal diameter between studies (≤ 2 mm), but the change in volume was found to vary widely (-2 to 69 mL). CONCLUSION: In patients with untreated infrarenal AAA, a change in aortic volume can occur in the absence of a significant change in maximal diameter. Additional work is needed to examine the relationship between change in AAA volume and outcomes in this patient group.
Authors: Brian Trinh; Iram Dubin; Ozair Rahman; Marcos P Ferreira Botelho; Nicholas Naro; James C Carr; Jeremy D Collins; Alex J Barker Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Sydney L Olson; Annalise M Panthofer; William Blackwelder; Michael L Terrin; John A Curci; B Timothy Baxter; Fred A Weaver; Jon S Matsumura Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2021-10-14 Impact factor: 4.860
Authors: Jan Egger; Harald Busse; Philipp Brandmaier; Daniel Seider; Matthias Gawlitza; Steffen Strocka; Philip Voglreiter; Mark Dokter; Michael Hofmann; Bernhard Kainz; Alexander Hann; Xiaojun Chen; Tuomas Alhonnoro; Mika Pollari; Dieter Schmalstieg; Michael Moche Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2015-10-20 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Jan Egger; Markus Gall; Jürgen Wallner; Pedro Boechat; Alexander Hann; Xing Li; Xiaojun Chen; Dieter Schmalstieg Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-03-21 Impact factor: 3.240