Literature DB >> 21316832

Deliberation to enhance awareness of and prioritize socioeconomic interventions for health.

Julianna E Pesce1, Chinwe S Kpaduwa, Marion Danis.   

Abstract

Health disparities are, to a large extent, the result of socio-economic factors that cannot be entirely mitigated through the health care system. While an array of social services are thought to be necessary to address the social determinants of health, budget constraints, particularly in difficult economic times, limit the availability of such services. It is therefore necessary to prioritize interventions through some fair process. While it might be appropriate to engage in public deliberation to set priorities, doing so requires that the public accept such a deliberative process and appreciate the social determinants of health. We therefore analyzed the results of a study in which groups deliberated to prioritize socio-economic interventions to examine whether these two requirements can possibly be met and to explore the basis for their priorities. A total of 431 residents of Washington, D.C. with incomes under 200% of the federal poverty threshold participated in 43 groups to engage in a hypothetical exercise to prioritize interventions designed to ameliorate the social determinants of health within the constraints of a limited budget. Findings from pre- and post-exercise questionnaires demonstrate that the priority setting exercise was perceived as a fair deliberative process, and that following the deliberation, participants became more likely to agree that a broad number of determinants contribute to their health. Qualitative analysis of the group discussions indicate that participants prioritized interventions that would provide for basic necessities and improve community conditions, while at the same time addressing more macro-structural factors such as homelessness and unemployment. We conclude that engaging small groups in deliberation about ways to address the social determinants of health can both change participant attitudes and yield informed priorities that might guide public policy aimed at most affordably reducing health disparities. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21316832      PMCID: PMC3081785          DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  22 in total

1.  When economists and epidemiologists disagree....

Authors:  I Kawachi; T A Blakely
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.265

Review 2.  Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes.

Authors:  Julia Abelson; Pierre-Gerlier Forest; John Eyles; Patricia Smith; Elisabeth Martin; Francois-Pierre Gauvin
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 3.  Message design strategies to raise public awareness of social determinants of health and population health disparities.

Authors:  Jeff Niederdeppe; Q Lisa Bu; Porismita Borah; David A Kindig; Stephanie A Robert
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  Understanding the dimensions of socioeconomic status that influence toddlers' health: unique impact of lack of money for basic needs in Quebec's birth cohort.

Authors:  Louise Séguin; Qian Xu; Lise Gauvin; Maria-Victoria Zunzunegui; Louise Potvin; Katherine L Frohlich
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Insurance benefit preferences of the low-income uninsured.

Authors:  Marion Danis; Andrea K Biddle; Susan Dorr Goold
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Does deliberation make a difference? Results from a citizens panel study of health goals priority setting.

Authors:  Julia Abelson; John Eyles; Christopher B McLeod; Patricia Collins; Colin McMullan; Pierre-Gerlier Forest
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Pediatric appendicitis rupture rate: disparities despite universal health care.

Authors:  Ioana Bratu; Patricia J Martens; William D Leslie; Natalia Dik; Dan Chateau; Alan Katz
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.545

8.  Food insecurity is associated with chronic disease among low-income NHANES participants.

Authors:  Hilary K Seligman; Barbara A Laraia; Margot B Kushel
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 4.798

9.  Job insecurity and health: a study of 16 European countries.

Authors:  Krisztina D László; Hynek Pikhart; Mária S Kopp; Martin Bobak; Andrzej Pajak; Sofia Malyutina; Gyöngyvér Salavecz; Michael Marmot
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 10.  Epidemiology of socioeconomic status and health: are determinants within countries the same as between countries?

Authors:  M Marmot
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.691

View more
  3 in total

1.  Using Participatory System Dynamics Modeling to Examine the Local HIV Test and Treatment Care Continuum in Order to Reduce Community Viral Load.

Authors:  Margaret R Weeks; Jianghong Li; David Lounsbury; Helena Danielle Green; Maryann Abbott; Marcie Berman; Lucy Rohena; Rosely Gonzalez; Shawn Lang; Heather Mosher
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2017-11-20

2.  Public understandings of potential policy responses to health inequalities: Evidence from a UK national survey and citizens' juries in three UK cities.

Authors:  K E Smith; A K Macintyre; S Weakley; S E Hill; O Escobar; G Fergie
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Swiss-CHAT: Citizens Discuss Priorities for Swiss Health Insurance Coverage.

Authors:  Samia A Hurst; Mélinée Schindler; Susan D Goold; Marion Danis
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2018-08-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.