Literature DB >> 21316669

A prospective assessment of sedation-related adverse events and patient and endoscopist satisfaction in ERCP with anesthesiologist-administered sedation.

Tyler M Berzin1, Sirish Sanaka, Sheila R Barnett, Eswar Sundar, Paul S Sepe, Moshe Jakubowski, Douglas K Pleskow, Ram Chuttani, Mandeep S Sawhney.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing use of anesthesiologist-administered sedation for monitored anesthesia care (MAC) or general anesthesia in patients undergoing ERCP, limited prospective data exist on the effectiveness, safety, and cost of this approach.
OBJECTIVE: To prospectively assess sedation-related adverse events (SRAEs), patient- and procedure-related risk factors associated with SRAEs, and endoscopist and patient satisfaction with anesthesiologist-administered sedation.
DESIGN: Single-center, prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Tertiary-care referral center. PATIENTS: A total of 528 consecutive patients undergoing ERCP.
INTERVENTIONS: Anesthesiologist-administered MAC or general anesthesia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: SRAEs, endoscopist and patient satisfaction.
RESULTS: There were 120 intraprocedure SRAEs during 109 of the 528 ERCPs (21% of cases). Intraprocedure SRAEs included hypotension (38 events), arrhythmia (20 events), O(2) desaturation to less than 85% (66 events), unplanned intubation (16 events), and procedure termination (1 event). Thirty postprocedure SRAEs occurred in a total of 22 patients (4% of cases), including hypotension (5 events), endotracheal intubation (2 events), and arrhythmia (12 events). Patient-related variables associated with adverse intraprocedure events were American Society of Anesthesiologists class (P = .004) and body mass index (kg/m(2)) (P = .02). On a 10-point scale, mean endoscopist satisfaction with sedation was 9.2 (standard deviation 1.8) and patient satisfaction with sedation was 9.9 (standard deviation 0.7). LIMITATIONS: The approach to sedation was not randomized.
CONCLUSIONS: Higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class and body mass index are associated with an increased rate of cardiac and respiratory events during ERCP. Cardiac and respiratory events are generally minor, and MAC can be considered a safe option for most ERCP patients. Despite the frequency of minor sedation-related events, procedure interruption or premature termination was rare in the setting of anesthesiologist-administered sedation.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21316669     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  46 in total

1.  Predictive Factors of Atelectasis Following Endoscopic Resection.

Authors:  Jung Wan Choe; Sung Woo Jung; Jong Kyu Song; Euddeum Shim; Ji Yung Choo; Seung Young Kim; Jong Jin Hyun; Ja Seol Koo; Hyung Joon Yim; Sang Woo Lee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Deep sedation without intubation for ERCP is appropriate in healthier, non-obese patients.

Authors:  Sheila Ryan Barnett; Tyler Berzin; Sirish Sanaka; Douglas Pleskow; Mandeep Sawhney; Ram Chuttani
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  ERCP: the unresolved question of endotracheal intubation.

Authors:  Basavana Goudra; Preet Mohinder Singh
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Anesthesia for Advanced Bronchoscopic Procedures: State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Basavana G Goudra; Preet Mohinder Singh; Anuradha Borle; Nahla Farid; Kassem Harris
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.584

5.  Sedation and monitoring for gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Somchai Amornyotin
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-02-16

6.  Anesthetist-Directed Sedation Favors Success of Advanced Endoscopic Procedures.

Authors:  James Buxbaum; Nitzan Roth; Nima Motamedi; Terrance Lee; Paul Leonor; Mark Salem; Dolores Gibbs; John Vargo
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Safety and efficacy of etomidate and propofol anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing gastroscopy: A double-blind randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Qing-Tao Meng; Chen Cao; Hui-Min Liu; Zhong-Yuan Xia; Wei Li; Ling-Hua Tang; Rong Chen; Meng Jiang; Yang Wu; Yan Leng; Chris C Lee
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  High-flow nasal oxygen for a high-risk patient undergoing sedation in the prone position.

Authors:  S Sodha; T Fernandez
Journal:  Anaesth Rep       Date:  2019-05-08

9.  Safety Analysis of Bariatric Patients Undergoing Outpatient Upper Endoscopy with Non-Anesthesia Administered Propofol Sedation.

Authors:  Tyler McVay; John C Fang; Linda Taylor; Alexander Au; Wesley Williams; Angela P Presson; Ragheed Al-Dulaimi; Eric Volckmann; Anna Ibele
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography under moderate sedation and factors predicting need for anesthesiologist directed sedation: A county hospital experience.

Authors:  Saurabh Chawla; Ariel Katz; Bashar M Attar; Benjamin Go
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-04-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.