Literature DB >> 21316614

Dynamic mechanical properties of oral mucosa: Comparison with polymeric soft denture liners.

M-H Lacoste-Ferré1, Ph Demont, J Dandurand, E Dantras, D Duran, C Lacabanne.   

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to characterize the viscoelastic behaviour of oral mucosa and compare it with the dynamic mechanical properties of different soft liners. For this purpose, a sample of pig oral mucosa and six commercialized soft liner samples have been investigated. A comparison was also carried with the first suitable hard rubber for dental prosthetics: vulcanite. Creep recovery (CR) and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) have been used to determine the mechanical modulus of oral mucosa and soft liners respectively. The Poisson ratio is used to compare mucosa bulk modulus and soft liner shear modulus. The biomechanical concept of conventional complete dentures needs a good adjustment of dynamic mechanical impedance between the base and oral mucosa. The viscoelastic mechanical property of the oral mucosa as a referent biopolymer has been confirmed in vitro. The modulus value, adjusted for old patients in physiological conditions, is in the order of 3 MPa. This study underlines the plasticization effect of absorbed water on the mechanical properties of the underlying tissue. This study allows us to define some characteristics of the most adapted biomaterial according to the clinical exigency. The required biomaterial must display the following properties: compatibility and chemical resistance with biological environment perpetuated mechanical properties during physiological conditions and clinical use, good adjustment of dynamic mechanical impedance with supporting mucosa and easy sample processing.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21316614     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  6 in total

1.  Nonwoven-based gelatin/polycaprolactone membrane proves suitability in a preclinical assessment for treatment of soft tissue defects.

Authors:  Simon Schulz; Marco Angarano; Martin Fabritius; Rolf Mülhaupt; Michel Dard; Marcel Obrecht; Pascal Tomakidi; Thorsten Steinberg
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  Effects of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 Dose and Ceramic Composition on New Bone Formation and Space Maintenance in a Canine Mandibular Ridge Saddle Defect Model.

Authors:  Anne D Talley; Kerem N Kalpakci; Daniel A Shimko; Katarzyna J Zienkiewicz; David L Cochran; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 3.  Biomechanical factors related to occlusal load transfer in removable complete dentures.

Authors:  Jarosław Żmudzki; Grzegorz Chladek; Jacek Kasperski
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2014-12-20

4.  Biomechanical Properties of Bone and Mucosa for Design and Application of Dental Implants.

Authors:  Michael Gasik; France Lambert; Miljana Bacevic
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 5.  Biomechanics of oral mucosa.

Authors:  Junning Chen; Rohana Ahmad; Wei Li; Michael Swain; Qing Li
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Investigation of dental elastomers as oral mucosa simulant materials.

Authors:  Joanne Jung Eun Choi; Shiyao Chen; John Neil Waddell
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2021-01-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.