Literature DB >> 21316535

A phase III, randomized, open-label study to assess the tolerability and immunogenicity of an H5N1 influenza vaccine administered to healthy adults with a 1-, 2-, 3-, or 6-week interval between first and second doses.

Jiri Beran1, Ibrahim A Abdel-Messih, Jolana Raupachova, Lenka Hobzova, Elena Fragapane.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preparedness for an H5N1 influenza pre-pandemic requires effective and well-tolerated emergency vaccination strategies that provide both pandemic strain-specific and heterologous protection.
OBJECTIVES: This was a pivotal study for the regulatory approval process for a candidate MF59-adjuvanted H5N1 vaccine. Its goals were to identify the preferred primary 2-dose vaccination schedule in adults and to assess whether the vaccine met European Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) licensure criteria.
METHODS: Healthy volunteers aged 18 to 60 years received 1 of 4 randomized schedules in which the 2 doses of vaccine were separated by a 1-, 2-, 3-, or 6-week interval. Three blood samples (~20 mL(-1)) were obtained from each subject: the first sample, immediately before administration of the first dose of vaccine; the second, immediately before administration of the second dose; and the third, 21 days after administration of the second dose. Hemagglutination inhibition (HI), microneutralization (MN), and single radial hemolysis (SRH) were assayed after each dose. Immunogenicity was assessed based on the CHMP licensure criteria for annual influenza vaccines (number of seroconversions or significant increase in HI titer >40%; mean geometric increase >2.5; and proportion of subjects achieving an HI titer ≥40 or SRH titer >25 mm(2) should be >70% [seroprotection]). Subjects recorded all adverse events occurring within 7 days of vaccine administration; information on any serious adverse events was collected throughout the study (duration, 202 days).
RESULTS: All study participants (N = 240) were white, with a mean age of 33 years and a mean body mass index of 24.6 kg/m(2). Equal numbers of men and women were assigned to each vaccination schedule. The CHMP criterion for seroprotection was achieved when the 2 doses of vaccine were separated by 2 (76%), 3 (72%), and 6 (79%) weeks; similar results were obtained on MN and SRH analysis. On the SRH analysis, the candidate vaccine showed a heterologous immune response to the H5N1/turkey/Turkey/1/05 (NIBRG-23; clade 2) influenza antigen. The vaccine met 2 of the 3 European licensure criteria, with seroconversion rates of 69% and 65% in the groups assigned to a 2- and 3-week interval between doses, respectively, and geometric mean ratios of 4.3 and 4.5. There were no serious adverse events related to vaccination. The most common adverse events reported within 7 days of the first and second doses of vaccine were mild to moderate injection-site pain (63%-73% and 34%-48%, respectively) and fatigue (25%-30% and 13%-24%).
CONCLUSIONS: Two 7.5-μg doses of MF59-adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine given 2, 3, or 6 weeks apart afforded H5N1-specific immunity and met the CHMP licensure criterion for seroprotection in these healthy volunteers. Clinically relevant levels of heterologous immunity were observed when the 2 doses of vaccine were administered either 2 or 3 weeks apart; however, the licensure criterion for seroprotection was not met in this case.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. Published by EM Inc USA.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21316535     DOI: 10.1016/S0149-2918(11)00024-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  13 in total

Review 1.  Effect of vaccine administration modality on immunogenicity and efficacy.

Authors:  Lu Zhang; Wei Wang; Shixia Wang
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 5.217

2.  Immunogenicity and safety of the influenza A/H1N1 2009 inactivated split-virus vaccine in young and older adults: MF59-adjuvanted vaccine versus nonadjuvanted vaccine.

Authors:  Hee Jin Cheong; Joon Young Song; Jung Yeon Heo; Ji Yun Noh; Won Suk Choi; Dae Won Park; Seong-Heon Wie; Woo Joo Kim
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2011-06-29

3.  Safety and immunogenicity of influenza whole inactivated virus vaccines: A phase I randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Renée A J van Boxtel; Pauline Verdijk; Otto J de Boer; Elly van Riet; Tjeert T Mensinga; Willem Luytjes
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Clinical vaccine development for H5N1 influenza.

Authors:  Christopher H Clegg; Joseph A Rininger; Susan L Baldwin
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.217

Review 5.  Immunobiology of influenza vaccines.

Authors:  Margarita M Gomez Lorenzo; Matthew J Fenton
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Development and pilot testing of a text message vaccine reminder system for use during an influenza pandemic.

Authors:  Jonathan D Lehnert; Alex Shevach; Sydney Walker; Rose Wang; Thomas J Fitzgerald; Samuel B Graitcer
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Assessment of antigen-specific and cross-reactive antibody responses to an MF59-adjuvanted A/H5N1 prepandemic influenza vaccine in adult and elderly subjects.

Authors:  Iván Bihari; Gyula Pánczél; Jozsef Kovacs; Jenny Beygo; Elena Fragapane
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2012-10-17

8.  Influenza virus h5 DNA vaccination is immunogenic by intramuscular and intradermal routes in humans.

Authors:  J E Ledgerwood; Z Hu; I J Gordon; G Yamshchikov; M E Enama; S Plummer; R Bailer; M B Pearce; T M Tumpey; R A Koup; J R Mascola; G J Nabel; B S Graham
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2012-09-05

9.  Glycan masking of hemagglutinin for adenovirus vector and recombinant protein immunizations elicits broadly neutralizing antibodies against H5N1 avian influenza viruses.

Authors:  Shih-Chang Lin; Wen-Chun Liu; Jia-Tsrong Jan; Suh-Chin Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Overview of Serological Techniques for Influenza Vaccine Evaluation: Past, Present and Future.

Authors:  Claudia Maria Trombetta; Daniele Perini; Stuart Mather; Nigel Temperton; Emanuele Montomoli
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2014-10-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.