Literature DB >> 21315677

Tibial component rotation assessment using CT scan in medial and lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

E Servien1, C Fary, S Lustig, G Demey, M Saffarini, S Chomel, P Neyret.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rotation of tibial component has not been analysed in literature for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. The purpose of the study was to determine and compare the rotation of medial and lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) tibial components. We assumed both components (lateral and medial) were positioned with external rotation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen lateral and 19 medial UKA patients were scanned postoperatively in neutral position with computed tomography enabling lower extremity three-dimensional image acquisition from the hip to the ankle. All the patients were operated by three different senior surgeons using the same surgical technique. From the reconstructions we measured the two-dimensional (2D) rotation of the tibial components.
RESULTS: The rotation of the tibial component was external (mean 6.5°, SD 5.1°) for the medial UKA and external (mean 7.3°, SD 10.3°) as well for the lateral UKA. The difference was statistically insignificant (P=0.717). DISCUSSION: This study presents the first 2D in vivo analysis accurately determining and comparing medial and lateral UKA component rotation. Despite a wide range of value, we found both components were indeed externally rotated. The variability in implant positioning was observed despite the rigorous performance of an experienced surgeon using routine techniques in patients selected under routine criteria. Further analysis of these patients for satisfaction and implant survivorship in relation to implant rotation may give us an optimal range for the tibial component. If it is found that this ideal range cannot be consistently obtained with current surgical techniques then there may be a case for the use of a navigation system.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21315677     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  15 in total

Review 1.  Lateral uni-compartmental knee replacement: current concepts and future directions.

Authors:  E Servien; A Merini; S Lustig; P Neyret
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Patient-specific implants for lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Marco K Demange; Arvind Von Keudell; Christian Probst; Hiroshi Yoshioka; Andreas H Gomoll
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Tibial component rotation during the unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: is the anterior superior iliac spine an appropriate landmark?

Authors:  Seung-Yup Lee; Suhwoo Chay; Hong-Chul Lim; Ji-Hoon Bae
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Accuracy of Individualized Custom Tibial Cutting Guides in UKA.

Authors:  Thomas J Heyse; Joseph D Lipman; Carl W Imhauser; Scott M Tucker; Yogesh Rajak; Geoffrey H Westrich
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2014-09-09

5.  Is tibial cut navigation alone sufficient in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? Continuous series of fifty nine procedures.

Authors:  Thomas Gicquel; Jean Christophe Lambotte; Jean Louis Polard; Mickael Ropars; Denis Huten
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Patient-specific instrumentation in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is reliable and accurate except for the tibial rotation.

Authors:  B Kerens; A M Leenders; M G M Schotanus; B Boonen; W E Tuinebreijer; P J Emans; B Jong; N P Kort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Improved positioning of the tibial component in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with patient-specific cutting blocks.

Authors:  M L Dao Trong; C Diezi; G Goerres; N Helmy
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Patient-specific positioning guides do not consistently achieve the planned implant position in UKA.

Authors:  Justin A M J van Leeuwen; Stephan M Röhrl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Femorotibial alignment measured during robotic assisted knee surgery is reliable: radiologic and gait analysis.

Authors:  Etienne Deroche; Alexandre Naaim; Timothy Lording; Raphael Dumas; Elvire Servien; Laurence Cheze; Sébastien Lustig; Cécile Batailler
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Deviation between navigated and final 3-dimensional implant position in mini-invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a pilot study in 13 patients.

Authors:  Nicolas Martinez-Carranza; Lars Weidenhielm; Joakim Crafoord; Margareta Hedström
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.