Literature DB >> 21314888

Together or alone?: foraging strategies in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Arjen J Boender1, Eric W Roubos, Gerard van der Velde.   

Abstract

A central goal in Life Sciences is to understand how genes encode behaviour and how environmental factors influence the expression of the genes concerned. To reach this goal a combined ecological, molecular biological and physiological approach is required in combination with a suitable model organism. Such an approach allows the elucidation of all parts of the complicated chain of events that lead from induction of gene expression to behaviour, i.e. from environmental stimulus, sensory organs and extracellular and intracellular neuronal signal processing to activation of effector organs. A particularly good model species with which to take this approach is the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, as it has been described in great detail at the genomic, cellular and behavioural levels. Different strains of C. elegans display prominent behavioural variation in foraging behaviour. Some strains will form social feeding groups when subjected to certain environmental stimuli, while others do not. This variation is due to the existence of just two isoforms of the gene npr-1, namely 215F and 215V. Here, we describe these behavioural variations at the molecular and cellular levels to attempt to determine the environmental inputs that cause aggregation of these small nematodes. As many different stimuli affect aggregation either positively or negatively, aggregation behaviour seems to be displayed when it improves survival chances. However, not much is known about the ecological context in which C. elegans lives. Investigation of the habitats of different strains of C. elegans would help us to understand why and how a specific foraging strategy enhances survival. The relatively well-understood molecular pathways that direct its social feeding behaviour make C. elegans a highly suitable model organism to test ecological and behavioural hypotheses about the mechanisms that differentiate between aggregation and solitary behaviours.
© 2011 The Authors. Biological Reviews © 2011 Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21314888     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00174.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  5 in total

1.  Reflections on plant and soil nematode ecology: past, present and future.

Authors:  Howard Ferris; Bryan S Griffiths; Dorota L Porazinska; Thomas O Powers; Koon-Hui Wang; Mario Tenuta
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.402

2.  Perspectives on the behavior of entomopathogenic nematodes from dispersal to reproduction: traits contributing to nematode fitness and biocontrol efficacy.

Authors:  Christine T Griffin
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.402

3.  Robust tracking and quantification of C. elegans body shape and locomotion through coiling, entanglement, and omega bends.

Authors:  Nicolas Roussel; Jeff Sprenger; Susan J Tappan; Jack R Glaser
Journal:  Worm       Date:  2015-01-22

4.  Spread and transmission of bacterial pathogens in experimental populations of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  S Anaid Diaz; Olivier Restif
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Social Chemical Communication Determines Recovery From L1 Arrest via DAF-16 Activation.

Authors:  Alejandro Mata-Cabana; Laura Gómez-Delgado; Francisco J Romero-Expósito; María J Rodríguez-Palero; Marta Artal-Sanz; María Olmedo
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-11-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.