OBJECTIVE: To evaluate serum free light chains (FLC) as a putative biomarker of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) activity. METHODS: Seventy-five SLE patients and 41 age- and sex-matched rheumatoid arthritis (RA) controls were enrolled. Disease activity was assessed using the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus: National Assessment version of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) definition and physician global assessments for SLE and the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints for RA. Serum FLC levels were compared against other biomarkers (IgG, C3, C4, double-stranded DNA [dsDNA] antibody). Nonparametric tests were used to compare 1) FLC and IgG in SLE versus RA and healthy controls, 2) FLC and IgG among different levels of activity in SLE, and 3) FLC in active versus nonactive RA. Correlation of FLC, C3, C4, dsDNA antibody, and IgG with the SLEDAI and modified SLEDAI (M-SLEDAI) were obtained. RESULTS: FLC was higher in SLE than in RA; both were higher than referent healthy controls. Total FLC was significantly higher in subjects with greater SLE disease activity than lower/no activity. There were no significant differences in IgG, C4, or dsDNA antibody stratified by disease activity. Total FLC and C3 showed moderate to strong correlation with the SLEDAI and M-SLEDAI. In RA, no differences were seen in FLC levels for different levels of disease activity. Similar results were seen after controlling for renal function, age, and sex. In multiple linear regression, FLC significantly explained 50% variance of the SLEDAI after adjusting for renal function, age, and sex. CONCLUSION: Serum FLC levels correlate strongly with disease activity in SLE, but not in RA. Serum FLC may be used as a biomarker of SLE disease activity.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate serum free light chains (FLC) as a putative biomarker of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) activity. METHODS: Seventy-five SLEpatients and 41 age- and sex-matched rheumatoid arthritis (RA) controls were enrolled. Disease activity was assessed using the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus: National Assessment version of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) definition and physician global assessments for SLE and the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints for RA. Serum FLC levels were compared against other biomarkers (IgG, C3, C4, double-stranded DNA [dsDNA] antibody). Nonparametric tests were used to compare 1) FLC and IgG in SLE versus RA and healthy controls, 2) FLC and IgG among different levels of activity in SLE, and 3) FLC in active versus nonactive RA. Correlation of FLC, C3, C4, dsDNA antibody, and IgG with the SLEDAI and modified SLEDAI (M-SLEDAI) were obtained. RESULTS: FLC was higher in SLE than in RA; both were higher than referent healthy controls. Total FLC was significantly higher in subjects with greater SLE disease activity than lower/no activity. There were no significant differences in IgG, C4, or dsDNA antibody stratified by disease activity. Total FLC and C3 showed moderate to strong correlation with the SLEDAI and M-SLEDAI. In RA, no differences were seen in FLC levels for different levels of disease activity. Similar results were seen after controlling for renal function, age, and sex. In multiple linear regression, FLC significantly explained 50% variance of the SLEDAI after adjusting for renal function, age, and sex. CONCLUSION: Serum FLC levels correlate strongly with disease activity in SLE, but not in RA. Serum FLC may be used as a biomarker of SLE disease activity.
Authors: F Gulli; C Napodano; M Marino; G Ciasca; K Pocino; V Basile; M Visentini; A Stefanile; L Todi; M De Spirito; G L Rapaccini; U Basile Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2019-10-31 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Y Murata; K Aoe; Y Mimura-Kimura; T Murakami; K Oishi; T Matsumoto; H Ueoka; K Matsunaga; M Yano; Y Mimura Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2017-07-17 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Carsten P Bramlage; Britta Froelich; Manuel Wallbach; Joan Minguet; Clemens Grupp; Cornelia Deutsch; Peter Bramlage; Gerhard A Müller; Michael Koziolek Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2017-02-18 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Carsten Paul Bramlage; Britta Froelich; Manuel Wallbach; Joan Minguet; Clemens Grupp; Cornelia Deutsch; Peter Bramlage; Michael Koziolek; Gerhard Anton Müller Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2016-10-12 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Xiaoli Deng; Cynthia S Crowson; S Vincent Rajkumar; Angela Dispenzieri; Dirk R Larson; Terry M Therneau; Eric L Matteson; Robert A Kyle; Jerry A Katzmann; Sherine E Gabriel; John M Davis Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2015-01-15 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Ana Belén Rodríguez-Cambrón; Juana Jiménez-Jiménez; María Ángeles Blázquez-Cañamero; Francis Rey Pazos; Cristina Macía-Villa; María Alcalde-Villar; Paz Collado-Ramos; Félix Manuel Cabero Del Pozo; Eva Álvarez-Andrés; Ana Cruz-Valenciano Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Aditya K Panda; Jyoti R Parida; Rina Tripathy; Sarit S Pattanaik; Balachandran Ravindran; Bidyut K Das Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2012-10-15 Impact factor: 5.156