OBJECTIVE: There is a growing body of evidence suggesting breast cancer (BC) recurrence risk might be linked to behavioral factors. However, little is known about BC survivors' beliefs regarding the link between their behavior and recurrence risk. The objective of this study was to describe BC survivors' beliefs regarding performance of behaviors potentially associated with BC recurrence risk reduction, and to examine the link between these behaviors and BC recurrence risk reduction beliefs, worry, and risk perception. METHODS: 200 female BC survivors (age, years: mean=57.7, standard deviation=9.2) completed a questionnaire assessing beliefs about the effectiveness of 14 potential BC recurrence risk reduction behaviors, their performance of these potential risk reduction behaviors, recurrence worry, and perception of personal lifetime BC recurrence risk. RESULTS: The behaviors most frequently endorsed as potentially reducing BC recurrence risk included avoiding tobacco use (84%), exercising at least three times per week (74%), eating an average of five servings a day of fruits and vegetables (72%), and limiting food intake to maintain current weight or lose weight (70%). Multivariate logistic regression analyses predicting behavioral performance showed that beliefs were consistently associated with behavior while worry and risk perception were largely unrelated to behavior. CONCLUSIONS: BC survivors' beliefs about the effectiveness of potential BC recurrence risk reduction behaviors are largely consistent with empirical findings and relate strongly to actual behavioral performance. Misconceptions about the effects of behavior to reduce BC recurrence risk are important targets for clinical and public health efforts.
OBJECTIVE: There is a growing body of evidence suggesting breast cancer (BC) recurrence risk might be linked to behavioral factors. However, little is known about BC survivors' beliefs regarding the link between their behavior and recurrence risk. The objective of this study was to describe BC survivors' beliefs regarding performance of behaviors potentially associated with BC recurrence risk reduction, and to examine the link between these behaviors and BC recurrence risk reduction beliefs, worry, and risk perception. METHODS: 200 female BC survivors (age, years: mean=57.7, standard deviation=9.2) completed a questionnaire assessing beliefs about the effectiveness of 14 potential BC recurrence risk reduction behaviors, their performance of these potential risk reduction behaviors, recurrence worry, and perception of personal lifetime BC recurrence risk. RESULTS: The behaviors most frequently endorsed as potentially reducing BC recurrence risk included avoiding tobacco use (84%), exercising at least three times per week (74%), eating an average of five servings a day of fruits and vegetables (72%), and limiting food intake to maintain current weight or lose weight (70%). Multivariate logistic regression analyses predicting behavioral performance showed that beliefs were consistently associated with behavior while worry and risk perception were largely unrelated to behavior. CONCLUSIONS: BC survivors' beliefs about the effectiveness of potential BC recurrence risk reduction behaviors are largely consistent with empirical findings and relate strongly to actual behavioral performance. Misconceptions about the effects of behavior to reduce BC recurrence risk are important targets for clinical and public health efforts.
Authors: Ann Partridge; Kristie Adloff; Emily Blood; E Claire Dees; Carolyn Kaelin; Mehra Golshan; Jennifer Ligibel; Janet S de Moor; Jane Weeks; Karen Emmons; Eric Winer Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2008-02-12 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Suzanne Mellon; Robin Gold; James Janisse; Michelle Cichon; Michael A Tainsky; Michael S Simon; Jeannette Korczak Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: John P Pierce; Marcia L Stefanick; Shirley W Flatt; Loki Natarajan; Barbara Sternfeld; Lisa Madlensky; Wael K Al-Delaimy; Cynthia A Thomson; Sheila Kealey; Richard Hajek; Barbara A Parker; Vicky A Newman; Bette Caan; Cheryl L Rock Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-06-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Crystal N Holick; Polly A Newcomb; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Linda Titus-Ernstoff; Andrew J Bersch; Meir J Stampfer; John A Baron; Kathleen M Egan; Walter C Willett Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2008-02-04 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Paul B Jacobsen; Kristine A Donovan; Brent J Small; Heather S Jim; Pamela N Munster; Michael A Andrykowski Journal: Cancer Date: 2007-10-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Kristine A Donovan; Brent J Small; Michael A Andrykowski; Pamela Munster; Paul B Jacobsen Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Kristin M Phillips; Heather L McGinty; Brian D Gonzalez; Heather S L Jim; Brent J Small; Susan Minton; Michael A Andrykowski; Paul B Jacobsen Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2012-03-15 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Kamaria L Lee; Nancy K Janz; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Reshma Jagsi; Lauren P Wallner; Allison W Kurian; Steven J Katz; Paul Abrahamse; Sarah T Hawley Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2017-08-17 Impact factor: 2.749
Authors: Beth A Glenn; Ann S Hamilton; Narissa J Nonzee; Annette E Maxwell; Catherine M Crespi; A Blythe Ryerson; L Cindy Chang; Dennis Deapen; Roshan Bastani Journal: J Psychosoc Oncol Date: 2018-05-15
Authors: Benjamin Ansa; Wonsuk Yoo; Mary Whitehead; Steven Coughlin; Selina Smith Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-12-23 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Beth A Glenn; Narissa J Nonzee; Ann S Hamilton; Lina Tieu; Annette E Maxwell; Catherine M Crespi; L Cindy Chang; Dennis Deapen; Roshan Bastani Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2020-08-14 Impact factor: 4.442