Literature DB >> 21312163

Time kinetics of bone defect healing in response to BMP-2 and GDF-5 characterised by in vivo biomechanics.

D Wulsten1, V Glatt, A Ellinghaus, K Schmidt-Bleek, A Petersen, H Schell, J Lienau, W Sebald, F Plöger, P Seemann, G N Duda.   

Abstract

This study reports that treatment of osseous defects with different growth factors initiates distinct rates of repair. We developed a new method for monitoring the progression of repair, based upon measuring the in vivo mechanical properties of healing bone. Two different members of the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) family were chosen to initiate defect healing: BMP-2 to induce osteogenesis, and growth-and-differentiation factor (GDF)-5 to induce chondrogenesis. To evaluate bone healing, BMPs were implanted into stabilised 5 mm bone defects in rat femurs and compared to controls. During the first two weeks, in vivo biomechanical measurements showed similar values regardless of the treatment used. However, 2 weeks after surgery, the rhBMP-2 group had a substantial increase in stiffness, which was supported by the imaging modalities. Although the rhGDF-5 group showed comparable mechanical properties at 6 weeks as the rhBMP-2 group, the temporal development of regenerating tissues appeared different with rhGDF-5, resulting in a smaller callus and delayed tissue mineralisation. Moreover, histology showed the presence of cartilage in the rhGDF-5 group whereas the rhBMP-2 group had no cartilaginous tissue. Therefore, this study shows that rhBMP-2 and rhGDF-5 treated defects, under the same conditions, use distinct rates of bone healing as shown by the tissue mechanical properties. Furthermore, results showed that in vivo biomechanical method is capable of detecting differences in healing rate by means of change in callus stiffness due to tissue mineralisation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21312163     DOI: 10.22203/ecm.v021a14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Cell Mater        ISSN: 1473-2262            Impact factor:   3.942


  12 in total

Review 1.  Implantable Sensors for Regenerative Medicine.

Authors:  Brett S Klosterhoff; Melissa Tsang; Didi She; Keat Ghee Ong; Mark G Allen; Nick J Willett; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 2.  Biomaterial delivery of morphogens to mimic the natural healing cascade in bone.

Authors:  Manav Mehta; Katharina Schmidt-Bleek; Georg N Duda; David J Mooney
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 15.470

3.  Wireless Implantable Sensor for Noninvasive, Longitudinal Quantification of Axial Strain Across Rodent Long Bone Defects.

Authors:  Brett S Klosterhoff; Keat Ghee Ong; Laxminarayanan Krishnan; Kevin M Hetzendorfer; Young-Hui Chang; Mark G Allen; Robert E Guldberg; Nick J Willett
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Mechanical load modulates the stimulatory effect of BMP2 in a rat nonunion model.

Authors:  Carolin Schwarz; Dag Wulsten; Agnes Ellinghaus; Jasmin Lienau; Bettina M Willie; Georg N Duda
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  Paracrine interactions between mesenchymal stem cells affect substrate driven differentiation toward tendon and bone phenotypes.

Authors:  Ram I Sharma; Jess G Snedeker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Repair of segmental rabbit radial defects with Cu/Zn co-doped calcium phosphate scaffolds incorporating GDF-5 carrier.

Authors:  Chengdong Zhang; Fei Yang; Dongqin Xiao; Qiao Zhao; Shuo Chen; Kang Liu; Bo Zhang; Gang Feng; Ke Duan
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 4.036

7.  Antibody-Mediated Osseous Regeneration for Bone Tissue Engineering in Canine Segmental Defects.

Authors:  A Khojasteh; S Hosseinpour; M M Dehghan; F Mashhadiabbas; M Rezai Rad; S Ansari; S Farzad Mohajeri; H H Zadeh
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  A review of biomaterials in bone defect healing, remaining shortcomings and future opportunities for bone tissue engineering: The unsolved challenge.

Authors:  T Winkler; F A Sass; G N Duda; K Schmidt-Bleek
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 5.853

9.  Bone morphogenetic protein 2-induced cellular chemotaxis drives tissue patterning during critical-sized bone defect healing: an in silico study.

Authors:  Edoardo Borgiani; Georg N Duda; Bettina M Willie; Sara Checa
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2021-05-28

10.  Repair of Cranial Bone Defects Using rhBMP2 and Submicron Particle of Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Ceramics with Through-Hole.

Authors:  Byung-Chul Jeong; Hyuck Choi; Sung-Woong Hur; Jung-Woo Kim; Sin-Hye Oh; Hyun-Seung Kim; Soo-Chang Song; Keun-Bae Lee; Kwang-Bum Park; Jeong-Tae Koh
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-09-27       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.