Literature DB >> 21311916

Leg pain and psychological variables predict outcome 2-3 years after lumbar fusion surgery.

Allan D Abbott1, Raija Tyni-Lenné, Rune Hedlund.   

Abstract

Prediction studies testing a thorough range of psychological variables in addition to demographic, work-related and clinical variables are lacking in lumbar fusion surgery research. This prospective cohort study aimed at examining predictions of functional disability, back pain and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) 2-3 years after lumbar fusion by regressing nonlinear relations in a multivariate predictive model of pre-surgical variables. Before and 2-3 years after lumbar fusion surgery, patients completed measures investigating demographics, work-related variables, clinical variables, functional self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, fear of movement/(re)injury, mental health and pain coping. Categorical regression with optimal scaling transformation, elastic net regularization and bootstrapping were used to investigate predictor variables and address predictive model validity. The most parsimonious and stable subset of pre-surgical predictor variables explained 41.6, 36.0 and 25.6% of the variance in functional disability, back pain intensity and HRQOL 2-3 years after lumbar fusion. Pre-surgical control over pain significantly predicted functional disability and HRQOL. Pre-surgical catastrophizing and leg pain intensity significantly predicted functional disability and back pain while the pre-surgical straight leg raise significantly predicted back pain. Post-operative psychomotor therapy also significantly predicted functional disability while pre-surgical outcome expectations significantly predicted HRQOL. For the median dichotomised classification of functional disability, back pain intensity and HRQOL levels 2-3 years post-surgery, the discriminative ability of the prediction models was of good quality. The results demonstrate the importance of pre-surgical psychological factors, leg pain intensity, straight leg raise and post-operative psychomotor therapy in the predictions of functional disability, back pain and HRQOL-related outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21311916      PMCID: PMC3175861          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1709-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  37 in total

Review 1.  The test of Lasègue: systematic review of the accuracy in diagnosing herniated discs.

Authors:  W L Devillé; D A van der Windt; A Dzaferagić; P D Bezemer; L M Bouter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  The Oswestry Disability Index.

Authors:  J C Fairbank; P B Pynsent
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Predictors of outcome in fusion surgery for chronic low back pain. A report from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study.

Authors:  O Hägg; P Fritzell; L Ekselius; A Nordwall
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Cross-cultural adaptation of the Norwegian versions of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Index.

Authors:  M Grotle; J I Brox; N K Vøllestad
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Early rehabilitation targeting cognition, behavior, and motor function after lumbar fusion: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Allan D Abbott; Raija Tyni-Lenné; Rune Hedlund
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art.

Authors:  Johan W S Vlaeyen; Steven J Linton
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  O Hägg; P Fritzell; A Nordwall
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-10-24       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  A prospective study of psychological predictors of lumbar surgery outcome.

Authors:  P M Trief; W Grant; B Fredrickson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The use of presurgical psychological screening to predict the outcome of spine surgery.

Authors:  A R Block; D D Ohnmeiss; R D Guyer; R F Rashbaum; S H Hochschuler
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Great expectations: really the novel predictor of outcome after spinal surgery?

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; Astrid Junge; Achim Elfering; Jiri Dvorak; François Porchet; Dieter Grob
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  29 in total

1.  Do surgical expectations change depending on first time surgery or reoperation? A prospective cohort study in lumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  G Vilà-Canet; A Covaro; A García de Frutos; M T Ubierna; S Rodríguez-Alabau; S Mojal; E Cáceres
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Exploring the expectation-actuality discrepancy: a systematic review of the impact of preoperative expectations on satisfaction and patient reported outcomes in spinal surgery.

Authors:  Christopher D Witiw; Alireza Mansouri; Francois Mathieu; Farshad Nassiri; Jetan H Badhiwala; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Influence of catastrophizing, anxiety, and depression on in-hospital opioid consumption, pain, and quality of recovery after adult spine surgery.

Authors:  Lauren K Dunn; Marcel E Durieux; Lucas G Fernández; Siny Tsang; Emily E Smith-Straesser; Hasan F Jhaveri; Shauna P Spanos; Matthew R Thames; Christopher D Spencer; Aaron Lloyd; Russell Stuart; Fan Ye; Jacob P Bray; Edward C Nemergut; Bhiken I Naik
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2017-11-10

4.  Pain Sensitivity and Pain Catastrophizing Are Associated With Persistent Pain and Disability After Lumbar Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Rogelio A Coronado; Steven Z George; Clinton J Devin; Stephen T Wegener; Kristin R Archer
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Development and Validation of a Daily Pain Catastrophizing Scale.

Authors:  Beth D Darnall; John A Sturgeon; Karon F Cook; Chloe J Taub; Anuradha Roy; John W Burns; Michael Sullivan; Sean C Mackey
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 5.820

6.  Patients' expectations of lumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  Carol A Mancuso; Roland Duculan; Marina Stal; Federico P Girardi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Optimizing Placebo and Minimizing Nocebo to Reduce Pain, Catastrophizing, and Opioid Use: A Review of the Science and an Evidence-Informed Clinical Toolkit.

Authors:  Beth D Darnall; Luana Colloca
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.230

Review 8.  Pain Psychology and Pain Catastrophizing in the Perioperative Setting: A Review of Impacts, Interventions, and Unmet Needs.

Authors:  Beth D Darnall
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.907

9.  Improvement in Pain After Lumbar Spine Surgery: The Role of Preoperative Expectations of Pain Relief.

Authors:  Carol A Mancuso; M C Reid; Roland Duculan; Federico P Girardi
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.442

10.  Minimize opioids by optimizing pain psychology.

Authors:  Beth D Darnall
Journal:  Pain Manag       Date:  2014-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.