Literature DB >> 21311382

Is cauda equina syndrome being treated within the recommended time frame?

Robert T Arrigo1, Paul Kalanithi, Maxwell Boakye.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a rare but devastating medical condition requiring urgent surgery to halt or reverse neurological compromise. Controversy exists as to how soon surgery must be performed after diagnosis, and clinical and medicolegal factors make this question highly relevant to the spine surgeon. It is unclear from the literature how often CES patients are treated within the recommended time frame.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether CES patients are being treated in compliance with the current guideline of surgery within 48 hours and to assess incidence, demography, comorbidities, and outcome measures of CES patients.
METHODS: We searched the 2003 to 2006 California State Inpatient Databases to identify degenerative lumbar disk disorder patients surgically treated for CES. An International Classification of Disease, ninth revision, clinical modification, diagnosis code was used to identify CES patients with advanced disease.
RESULTS: The majority (88.74%) of California's CES patients received surgery within the recommended 48-hour window after diagnosis. The incidence of CES in surgically treated degenerative lumbar disk patients was 1.51% with an average of 397 cases per year in California. CES patients had worse outcomes and used more healthcare resources than other surgically treated degenerative lumbar disk patients; this disparity was more pronounced for patients with advanced CES. CES patients treated after 48 hours had 3 times the odds of a nonroutine discharge as patients treated within 48 hours (odds ratio = 3.082; P < .001).
CONCLUSION: In California, patients are being treated within the recommended 48-hour time frame.
Copyright © 2011 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21311382     DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31820cd426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  6 in total

Review 1.  Intradural lumbar disc herniation: report of five cases with literature review.

Authors:  Luis Gustavo Ducati; Mateus Violin Silva; Michele Madeira Brandão; Flavio Ramalho Romero; Marco Antonio Zanini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Do we know the outcome predictors for cauda equine syndrome (CES)? A retrospective, single-center analysis of 60 patients with CES with a suggestion for a new score to measure severity of symptoms.

Authors:  Alexander König; Lisa Amelung; Marco Danne; Ullrich Meier; Johannes Lemcke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Outcomes Following Surgical Management of Cauda Equina Syndrome: Does Race Matter?

Authors:  Amit Jain; Emmanuel Menga; Addisu Mesfin
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2017-04-21

Review 4.  Outcomes Reported After Surgery for Cauda Equina Syndrome: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Nisaharan Srikandarajah; Martin Wilby; Simon Clark; Adam Noble; Paula Williamson; Tony Marson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 3.241

5.  Changes in lumbosacral spinal nerve roots on diffusion tensor imaging in spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Zhong-Jun Hou; Yong Huang; Zi-Wen Fan; Xin-Chun Li; Bing-Yi Cao
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.135

6.  Intradural Disc a Diagnostic Dilemma: Case Series and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Ayush Sharma; Vijay Singh; Gururaj Sangondimath; Prashant Kamble
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.