Literature DB >> 21311335

A critical analysis of the long-term impact of brachytherapy for prostate cancer: a review of the recent literature.

David Bowes1, Juanita Crook.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: A number of articles have been published in the past several months providing long-term follow-up data on large brachytherapy series from centers of excellence or highly experienced individual practitioners. Our purpose is to review this recent literature and place it in context, especially as compared with notable articles in the recent past that have described less favorable outcomes. RECENT
FINDINGS: A total of 3773 patients were included in three large permanent seed implant studies, the first with almost exclusively low-dose rate permanent seed brachytherapy monotherapy, the second including a large proportion of patients receiving 6 months of androgen suppression, and the third including both supplemental external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and hormonal therapy. The 7-10 year biochemical no evidence of disease rates ranged from 94 to 95.6%, with the vast majority of patients achieving prostate specific antigen nadirs less than 0.4 ng/ml. Eight to 10 year follow-up on high-dose rate brachytherapy patients treated with combined EBRT and an high-dose rate boost are equally impressive, especially considering that these series contain a large proportion of men with unfavorable disease.
SUMMARY: Both low-dose rate and high-dose rate prostate brachytherapy, either alone or given as a boost combined with moderate-dose EBRT, provide impressive long-term disease control and may be the optimal form of intraprostatic dose escalation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21311335     DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3283449d52

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Urol        ISSN: 0963-0643            Impact factor:   2.309


  3 in total

1.  Dose to the bladder neck is the most important predictor for acute and late toxicity after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: implications for establishing new dose constraints for treatment planning.

Authors:  Lara Hathout; Michael R Folkert; Marisa A Kollmeier; Yoshiya Yamada; Gil'ad N Cohen; Michael J Zelefsky
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Impact of edema and seed movement on the dosimetry of prostate seed implants.

Authors:  Ron S Sloboda; N Usmani; T T Monajemi; D M-C Liu
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2012-04

3.  A Phase 2 Randomized Pilot Study Comparing High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy and Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Lara Hathout; Omar Mahmoud; Yaqun Wang; Irina Vergalasova; Maroie Barkati; Philippe Després; André-Guy Martin; William Foster; Frédéric Lacroix; Guila Delouya; Daniel Taussky; Gerard Morton; Eric Vigneault
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-04-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.